SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Contemporary Educational Technology / 2019 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4

Preservice Teachers’ Personality Traits and Social Network Use Purposes

Ferit Karakoyun
Pages
399–415
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings revealedthat among the personality traits, conscientiousness, openness to experience and negativevalence were predictors of the sub-factors of social network use purposes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Facilities provided by social network sites allow individuals to use social networks for variouspurposes such as communication, entertainment and information sharing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The participants of the study were 660 preservice teachers attendinga Turkish university.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings revealedthat among the personality traits, conscientiousness, openness to experience and negativevalence were predictors of the sub-factors of social network use purposes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Facilities provided by social network sites allow individuals to use social networks for variouspurposes such as communication, entertainment and information sharing. These purposesvary depending on the social networks individuals use and on their personality traits. Thepresent study examined preservice teachers’ social network use purposes with respect totheir personality traits. The participants of the study were 660 preservice teachers attendinga Turkish university. For data collection in the study “Scale of Social Network Use Purposes”and “Basic Personality Traits Inventory” were used. The research data were analyzed usingPearson Correlation Analysis and Multi-Linear Regression Analysis. The findings revealedthat among the personality traits, conscientiousness, openness to experience and negativevalence were predictors of the sub-factors of social network use purposes. As for otherpersonality factors, neuroticism and extraversion were not significant predictors of the totalsocial network use purpose score or its sub-factors.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karakoyun, F. (2022). Preservice Teachers’ Personality Traits and Social Network Use Purposes. Contemporary Educational Technology, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4, 399–415. https://ajindex.com/articles/476585

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Alan, A.K. & Kabadayı, E.T. (2016). The effect of personal factors on social media usage of young consumers. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 595-602.
  2. Amichai-Hamburger, Y. & Ben-Artzi, E. (2003). Loneliness and Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(1), 71-80.
  3. Amichai-Hamburger, Y. & Vinitzky, G. (2010). Social network use and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1289-1295.
  4. Atabek, O. (2012). Preservice teachers’ personality, motives, motivation, and attitudes associated with the use of social network services: Facebook case. In C.D. Maddux & D. Gibson (Eds.), Research highlights in technology and teacher education 2012 (pp. 109- 116). SITE. Avcilar, M. Y., & Demirgunes, B. K. (2016). Analyzing the effects of personality traits on motivations for using social media. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, 3(3), 251-271.
  5. Boyd, D.M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
  6. Butt, S. & Phillips, J. G. (2008). Personality and self-reported mobile phone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), 346-360.
  7. Buyukozturk, S., Cakmak, E. K., Akgun, Ö. A., Karadeniz, S. & Demirel, F. (2010). Bilimsel arastirma yontemleri. Ankara:
  8. PegemA. Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 56, 453-484.
  9. Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & De Zuniga, H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 247-253.
  10. Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R. Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Cetin, E. (2009). Sosyal iletisim aglari ve genclik: Facebook ornegi. Uluslararasi Davraz Kongresi Bildiri Kitabi (ss. 1094–1105). Isparta: Suleyman Demirel Universitesi. Dal, N.E., & Dal, V. (2014). Kisilik ozellikleri ve sosyal ag sitesi kullanim aliskanliklari: Universite ogrencileri uzerine bir arastirma. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, 6(11), 144-162.
  11. De Raad, B. & Schouwenburg, H.C. (1996). Personality in learning and education: A review. European Journal of Personality, 10, 303-336.
  12. Dunaetz, D. (2008). A meta-analysis of the relationship between personality and preferred conflict style. Retrieved on 15 May 2019 from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227529 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3227529.
  13. Durrett, C. & Trull, T