Journals / Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi / 2002 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 4

Halo-vest treatment in cervical injury

Servikal yaralanmalarda halo-vest tedavisi

Pages
245–251
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, we think that if applied properly, the number of the complications related to the halo-vest will be reduced and success rate will be high.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background.- In this report, we try to describe the halo-vest treatment in patients with cervical spine injuries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Design.- The study included the 55 consecutive patients who admitted to the Emergency Department of Cerrahpasa Medical School between 1986 and 2001 and who were treated by halo-vest.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, we think that if applied properly, the number of the complications related to the halo-vest will be reduced and success rate will be high.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background.- In this report, we try to describe the halo-vest treatment in patients with cervical spine injuries. The complications as a consequence halo-vest treatment also have discussed in the light of the literature. Design.- The study included the 55 consecutive patients who admitted to the Emergency Department of Cerrahpasa Medical School between 1986 and 2001 and who were treated by halo-vest. Results.- Forty-five of 55 patients were treated solely by halo-vest conservatively but 10 patients were required surgical intervention as anterior/posterior fusion following halo-vest. Twenty-four of 29 patients with upper cervical injuries and 21 of 26 patients with lower cervical injuries were treated by halo-vest successfully. The success rate in this series was found to be 96.6 %. Conclusion.- Although there are some complications as in all treatment modalities, the halo-vest is considered by us to be the best commercially available orthosis for control of the cervical spine in case of injury. Furthermore, we think that if applied properly, the number of the complications related to the halo-vest will be reduced and success rate will be high.

Özet

1.Servikal yaralanma şüphesinde radyogra- fîk görüntüler rutin olarak alınmalıdır. Gerekir¬ se dikkatli bir şekilde fleksiyon/ekstansiyon grafıleri de sağlanmalıdır. 2.Üst ve alt servikal yaralanmalarda halo- vest ile immobilizasyon sağlanmalıdır. Eğer fa- set kilitlenmesi varsa veya posterior kompleks yaralanması varsa halo-vest ile stabilizasyon sağlandıktan sonra cerrahi uygulanmalıdır. 3.Halo-vest bize göre piyasada bulunan en iyi servikal immobilizasyon aracıdır. Kurallara uygun olarak takıldığında komplikasyonlar en aza inecektir. 4.Vurgulamak gerekir ki, halo-vest her za¬ man servikal immobilizasyonda tam garanti sağlamaz. Endikasyon iyi konulmadan kulanı- lırsa yıkıcı komplikasyonlar doğurabilir. Bu nedenle uygulandıktan sonra rutin kalması ge¬ reken 3 ay içinde her 4 haftada bir kez olmak üzere servikal direkt grafıler alınarak servikal bölge değerlendirilmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TANRIVERDİ, T., AK, H., KUDAY, C., TÜRECİ, E., HANCI, M. (2022). Halo-vest treatment in cervical injury. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 4, 245–251. https://ajindex.com/articles/473513

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Crutchfıeld WG. Skeletal traction for dislocations of the cervical spine.The Southern Surgeon 1993; 2: 156-159
  2. Cloward RB. Treatment of acute fractures and fracture- dislocations of the cervical spine by vertebral-body fusion. J Neurosurg 1961; 18: 201-209
  3. Gallie WE. Fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine. Am J Surg 1939; 46: 495-499
  4. Verbiest H. Anterolateral operations for fractures and dislocations in the middle and lower parts of the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg 1969; 51A: 1489-1530
  5. Johnson RM, Owen JR, Hart DL, et al. Cervical orthosis: A guide to'their selection and use. Clin Orthop Related Res. 1981; 154: 34-45
  6. Perry J, Nickel VL. Total cervical-spine fusion for neck paralysis. J Bone Joint Surg 1959; 41A: 37-60
  7. Jarnes JIP. Fracture dislocation of the cervical spine. J Roy Coll Surg 1960; 5: 232
  8. Thompson, Harral. The halo traction apparatus. A method of external splitting of the cervical spine after injury. J Bone and Joint Surg 1962; 44B: 655-661
  9. Freeman GE Jr. Correction of severe deformity of the cervical spine in ankylosing spondylitis with the halo device. A case report. J Bone and Joint Surg 1961; 43A: 547-552
  10. Panuska HJ, and Dedolph TH. Extraoral traction with halo head frame for complex facial fractures. J Oral Surg 1965; 23: 212-221
  11. Ekong CEU, Schwartz ML, Tator CH, et al. Odontoid fracture: management with early mobilization using the halo device. Neurosurgery 1981; 9: 631-637
  12. Johnson RM, Hart DL, Simmons EF, et al. Cervical orthoses. A study comparing their effectiveness in restricting cervical motion in normal subjects. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1977; 59A: 332-339
  13. Kuhn RA, Garrett A. The halo in the management of cervical spine lesions. Orthopaedic Review 1972; 1(6): 25-27
  14. Lyddon DW Jr. Experience with the halo and body cast in the ambulatory treatment of cervical spine fractures. IMJ 1974; 146: 458-490
  15. Zwerling MT, and Riggins RS. Use of the halo apparatus in acute injuries of the cervical spine. Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics 1974; 138: 189-193
  16. Cooper PR, Maravilla KR, Sklar FH, et al. Halo immobilization of cervical spine fractures: Indications and results. J Neurosurg 1979; 50:603-610
  17. O'Brien JP. The halo-pelvic apparatus: A clinical, bio- enengineering and anatomical study. (Thesis). Acta Orthop Scand 1975; 163(Suppl): 20-28
  18. Nickel VL, Perry J, Garrett A, et al. The halo. J Bone Joint Surg 1968; 50A: 1400-1409
  19. Frankel HL, Hancock DO,