The Decision of the Federal Court of Justi̇ce For the Si̇xth Civil Senate Dated 27.03.2007 and Numbered 123/06 Regarding the Assertion of New Means of Offence and Defence in the Instance of Appea
Alman Temyiz Mahkemesi 8. Hukuk Dairesi’nin İstinaf Derecesinde Yeni Vakıa İleri Sürülmesine İlişkin 27.3.2007 Tarih ve 123/06 Sayılı Kararı
If the demand of eviction of the plaintiff becomes due after the end of the hearing in the court of first instance earliest, the plaintiff can assert this in the instance of appeal.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:After the amendment made with the Reform Bill, the change wanted to be made in the decision of the court of first intance with the recourse of appeal can be justified as long as the assertion of new means of offence and defence in the instance of appeal is permissible, too.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After the amendment made with the Reform Bill, the change wanted to be made in the decision of the court of first intance with the recourse of appeal can be justified as long as the assertion of new means of offence and defence in the instance of appeal is permissible, too.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:If the demand of eviction of the plaintiff becomes due after the end of the hearing in the court of first instance earliest, the plaintiff can assert this in the instance of appeal.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Medeni Yargılama Hukuku · kanun yolları · istinaf
Abstract
After the amendment made with the Reform Bill, the change wanted to be made in the decision of the court of first intance with the recourse of appeal can be justified as long as the assertion of new means of offence and defence in the instance of appeal is permissible, too. If the demand of eviction of the plaintiff becomes due after the end of the hearing in the court of first instance earliest, the plaintiff can assert this in the instance of appeal.
Özet
Reform Kanunu ile yapılan değişiklikten sonra da yeni iddia ve savunma araç- larının istinaf aşamasında ileri sürülmesi caiz olduğu ölçüde istinaf başvurusu ile ilk derece mahkemesinin kararında yapılmak istenen değişiklik gerekçelendirilebilir. Davacının tahliye talebi en erken ilk derece mahkemesi önündeki sözlü yargılamanın bitiminden sonra muaccel hale gelmişse davacı bunu istinaf aşamasında ileri sürebilir
Akil, Ç. D. I. C. (2010). The Decision of the Federal Court of Justi̇ce For the Si̇xth Civil Senate Dated 27.03.2007 and Numbered 123/06 Regarding the Assertion of New Means of Offence and Defence in the Instance of Appea. Ankara Barosu Dergisi, Sayı: 3, 201–204. https://ajindex.com/articles/47282