Journals / Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3

Analytical Method Development and Validation of Phenothrin, Promecarb and Penconazole in Tobacco using Liquid Extraction and Gas Chromatography

Pages
327–331
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Under this developedmethod, the concentrations of phenothrin, promecarb and penconazole in the 10 tobacco samples were below the LOD values.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A sensitive method for the determination of phenothrin, promecarb andpenconazole residues in tobacco has been developed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Under the optimum conditions, phenothrin R2 value 0.999, promecarbR2 value 0.999, and penconazole R2 value 0.999.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Under this developedmethod, the concentrations of phenothrin, promecarb and penconazole in the 10 tobacco samples were below the LOD values.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

A sensitive method for the determination of phenothrin, promecarb andpenconazole residues in tobacco has been developed. Several solvents such as, hexane, ethyl acetate and dichloromethane were tested in order to minimize agricultural products residue. In the study, the best recovery was achieved with dichloromethane. Pesticides residues are extracted from the samples with dichloromethane. Additional clean-up steps are not required for tobacco matrices. Determination and quantification of phenothrin, promecarb and penconazole are performed by gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC/FID) and gaschromatography-nitrogen/phosphorus (GC/NPD). The method has been validated fortobacco matrices. Under the optimum conditions, phenothrin R2 value 0.999, promecarbR2 value 0.999, and penconazole R2 value 0.999. Limits of determination were 0.008 µg mL-1 for phenothrin, 0.011 µg mL-1 for penconazole and 0.007 µg mL-1 for promecarb. The standard deviations (SDs) levels were in the range 0.01-0.20. Recoveries of phenothrin, promecarband penconazole from tobacco were found to be higher than 85%. Under this developedmethod, the concentrations of phenothrin, promecarb and penconazole in the 10 tobacco samples were below the LOD values.

🔖

Cite This Article

CANBAY, H. S. (2022). Analytical Method Development and Validation of Phenothrin, Promecarb and Penconazole in Tobacco using Liquid Extraction and Gas Chromatography. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3, 327–331. https://ajindex.com/articles/472268

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Melgar, M.J, Santaeufemia, M, Garcìa, M.A, Organophosphorus pesticide residues in raw milk and infant formulas from Spanish northwest, Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B, 2010, 45, 595–600.
  2. Ergonen, A.T, Salacin S, Ozdemir M.H, Pesticide use among greenhouse workers in Turkey. The Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine, 2005, 12, 205–208.
  3. Blair, A, Zahm, S.H, Pearce, N.E, Heineman E.F, Fraumeni J, Clues to cancer etiology from studies of farmers, Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 1992, 18, 209–215.
  4. Nicolopoulou-Stamati, P, Maipas, S, Kotampasi, C, Stamatis, P, Hens, L, Chemical Pesticides and Human Health: The Urgent Need for a New Concept in Agriculture, Frontiers Public Health, 2016, 4(148), 1-8.
  5. Sun, X.H, Song, J.R., Tan, Z.C, Di, Y.Y, Ma, H.X, Wang, M.H, Sun, L.X, Heat capacity and enthalpy of fusion of penconazole, Thermochimica Acta, 413(1-2), 261-265.
  6. Jimenez, J.J, Bernal, J.L, del Nozal, M.J, Toribio, L, Arias, E, Analysis of pesticide residues in wine by solid-phase extraction and gas chromatography with electron capture and nitrogen–phosphorus detection, Journal of Chromatography A, 2001, 919, 147–156.
  7. Gelsomino, A, Petrovičowȧ, B, Tiburtini, S, Magnani, E, Felici, M, Multiresidue analysis of pesticides in fruits and vegetables by gel permeation chromatography followed by gas chromatography with electron-capture and mass spectrometric detection, Journal of Chromatography A, 1997, 782, 105-122.
  8. Oliva, J, Navarro, S, Barba, A, Navarro G, Determination of chlorpyrifos, penconazole, fenarimol, vinclozolin and metalaxyl in grapes, must and wine by on-line microextraction and gas chromatography, Journal of Chromatography A, 1999, 833, 43–51.
  9. Navarro, S, Barba, A, Navarro, G, Vela, N, Oliva, J, Multiresidue method for the rapid determination – in grape, must and wine–of fungicides frequently used on vineyards, Journal of Chromatography A, 2000, 882, 221–229.
  10. Arrebola, F.J, Martínez Vidal, J.L, Mateu-Sánchez, M, Álvarez-Castellón, F.J, Determination of 81 multiclass pesticides in fresh foodstuffs by a single injection analysis using gas chromatography–chemical ionization and electron ionization tandem mass spectrometry, Analytica Chimica Acta, 2003, 484, 167–180.
  11. Pan, H.J, Ho, W.H, Determination of fungicides in water using liquid phase microextraction and gas chromatography with electron capture detection, Analytica Chimica Acta, 2004, 527, 61–67.
  12. Hirahara, Y, Tsumura, Y, Nakamura, Y, Tonogai, Y, Shibata, T, Analysis