Journals / Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

An Optimization Study for Chitosan Nanoparticles: Synthesis and Characterization

Pages
119–127
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was believed thatchitosan nanoparticles produced by optimum conditions determined as a result of the study can be used inmany areas including as a drug delivery system in future studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Studies have been carried out to determine the optimum conditions for chitosan nanoparticles.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Optimum conditions for process variables were provided by adjusting the sonicatorat 50 W power value for 5 minutes and 30-10 pulse interval; while the formulation variables were foundto be chitosan:TPP mass ratio of 5:1, pH value of 5 and under light.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was believed thatchitosan nanoparticles produced by optimum conditions determined as a result of the study can be used inmany areas including as a drug delivery system in future studies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Studies have been carried out to determine the optimum conditions for chitosan nanoparticles. Variousformulations have been made which can affect the size and polydispersity index of the nanoparticles andthe process variables have been investigated. These formulation and process variables were defined andoptimized to obtain the smallest particle size. The concentration of chitosan polymer and crosslinkerconcentration were studied as formulation variables. Agitation speed, agitation time, pH, light effect,sonication time and sonication power parameters were selected as process variables. In the experimentsperformed for one parameter, all other parameters were kept constant. The optimum conditions weredetermined by the effect of formulation and process variables on particle size and polydispersity index.For the characterization of chitosan nanoparticles, Zeta-Sizer, UV-Vis, FTIR and SEM analyticaltechniques were used. Optimum conditions for process variables were provided by adjusting the sonicatorat 50 W power value for 5 minutes and 30-10 pulse interval; while the formulation variables were foundto be chitosan:TPP mass ratio of 5:1, pH value of 5 and under light. After the optimum conditionsobtained BSA loading was performed and characterization studies were carried out. It was believed thatchitosan nanoparticles produced by optimum conditions determined as a result of the study can be used inmany areas including as a drug delivery system in future studies.

🔖

Cite This Article

Arayıcı, P. P., Derman, S., Büyük, N. İ., Mustafaeva, Z., Yücel, S. (2022). An Optimization Study for Chitosan Nanoparticles: Synthesis and Characterization. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 119–127. https://ajindex.com/articles/472129

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. . Panyam J, Labhasetwar V. 2012. Biodegradable Nanoparticle from Drug and Gene Delivery to Cells and Tissue. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.; 64:61–71. [2]. Soppimath KS, Aminabhavi TM, Kulkarni AR, Rudzinski WE. 2001. Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles as drug delivery devices. Journal of Controlled Release.; 70 (1–2):1–20. [3]. Jameela SR, Misra A, Jayakrishnan A. 1995. Cross-linked chitosan microspheres as carriers for prolonged delivery of macromolecular drugs. Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition.; 6 (7):621–632. [4]. Calvo P, Lopez CR, Vila-Jato JL, Alonso MJ. 1997. Novel Hydrophilic Chitosan – Polyethylene Oxide Nanoparticles as Protein Carriers. Journal of Applied Polymer Science.; 63:125– 132. [5]. Naskar S, Sharma S, Kuotsu K. 2019. Chitosan-based nanoparticles: An overview of biomedical applications and its preparation. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology.; 49:66–81. [6]. Schroeder A, Kost J, Barenholz Y. 2009.
  2. Ultrasound, Liposomes, and Drug Delivery: Principles for using Ultrasound to Control the release of Drugs from Liposomes. Chemistry and Physics of Lipids.; 162:1–16. [7]. Tsai M, Bai S, Chen R. 2008. Cavitation effects versus stretch effects resulted in different size and polydispersity of ionotropic gelation chitosan–sodium tripolyphosphate nanoparticle. Carbohydrate Polymers.; 71:448–457. [8]. Grieser F, Ashokkumar M, Sostaric J. 1999. Sonochemistry and sonoluminescence in colloidal systems. Sonochemistry and Sonoluminescence NATO ASI Series.;, pp 345–362. [9]. Tang ESKSK, Huang M, Lim LYY. 2003. Ultrasonication of chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles. International Journal of Pharmaceutics.; 265 (1–2):103–114. [10]. Al-Nemrawi NK, Alsharif SSM, Dave RH. 2018. Preparation of chitosan-tpp nanoparticles: The influence of chitosan polymeric properties and formulation variables. International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics.; 10 (5):60–65. [11]. Fan W, Yan W, Xu Z, Ni H. 2012. Formation mechanism of monodisperse, low molecular weight chitosan nanoparticles by ionic gelation technique. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces.; 90:21–27. [12]. Gan Q, Wang T, Cochrane C, McCarron P. 2005. Modulation of surface charge, particle size and morphological properties of chitosan-TPP nanoparticles intended for gene delivery. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces.; 44 (2–3):65–73. [13]. Phu D Van, Duy NN, Quoc LA, Hien NQ. 2009. The effect of ph and molecular weight of chitosan on silver nanoparticles synthesized by irradi