Journals / Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1

Metakaolin and Red-Mud Based Geopolymer: Resistance to Sodium and Magnesium Sulfate Attack

Pages
101–113
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, to evaluate this work, theScanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Diffraction methods were investigated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper aims to study strength properties, UPV, and weight changes exposed to sulfate attack, andmicrostructural properties of geopolymer mortar prepared using metakaolin and red-mud as bindermaterials by mixing with river sand replaced partially by limestone, marble and basalt powder withdifferent ratios (25%, 50%, and 75%) as filler materials, the mix proposed were activated by sodiumsilicate and sodium hydroxide solutions (12mol).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The proposed samples were exposed to 10% ofmagnesium and sodium sulfate solutions for various periods of 60, 120, and 180 days to investigate thedurability properties of the manufactured geopolymer mortar.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, to evaluate this work, theScanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Diffraction methods were investigated.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper aims to study strength properties, UPV, and weight changes exposed to sulfate attack, andmicrostructural properties of geopolymer mortar prepared using metakaolin and red-mud as bindermaterials by mixing with river sand replaced partially by limestone, marble and basalt powder withdifferent ratios (25%, 50%, and 75%) as filler materials, the mix proposed were activated by sodiumsilicate and sodium hydroxide solutions (12mol). The proposed samples were exposed to 10% ofmagnesium and sodium sulfate solutions for various periods of 60, 120, and 180 days to investigate thedurability properties of the manufactured geopolymer mortar. The experimentally obtained resultsuncover that the prepared geopolymer mortar’s strength properties increase at 60 days for all the proposedmixes, while at 180 days; the geopolymer mortar suffers a significant loss. Change in weight increaseobviously between 10.83% and 13.65% for 60 days and decrease gradually for 120 days between 9.22%and 10.19% to reach a stable value between 120 and 180 days. Furthermore, to evaluate this work, theScanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Diffraction methods were investigated.

🔖

Cite This Article

Canpolat, O., Chakkor, O., Altan, M. F. (2022). Metakaolin and Red-Mud Based Geopolymer: Resistance to Sodium and Magnesium Sulfate Attack. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1, 101–113. https://ajindex.com/articles/472125

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. E.E. Hekal, E. Kishar, H. Mostafa, Magnesium sulfate attack on hardened blended cement pastes under different circumstances, Cement and Concrete Research, 32 (2002) 1421-1427
  2. M. Santhanam, M.D. Cohen, J. Olek, Mechanism of sulfate attack: a fresh look: Part 2. Proposed mechanisms, Cement and concrete research, 33 (2003) 341-346
  3. D. Bonen, M.D. Cohen, Magnesium sulfate attack on Portland cement paste-I. Microstructural analysis, Cement and concrete research, 22 (1992) 169-180
  4. D. Bonen, M.D. Cohen, Magnesium sulfate attack on portland cement paste—II. Chemical and mineralogical analyses, Cement and concrete research, 22 (1992) 707-718
  5. N.B. Singh, B. Middendorf, Geopolymers as an alternative to Portland cement: An overview, Construction and Building Materials, 237 (2020) 117455
  6. N. Singh, B. Middendorf, Geopolymers as an alternative to Portland cement: An overview, Construction and Building Materials, 237 (2020) 117455
  7. C. Villa, E.T. Pecina, R. Torres, L. Gómez, Geopolymer synthesis using alkaline activation of natural zeolite, Construction and Building Materials, 24 (2010) 2084-2090
  8. B. Singh, G. Ishwarya, M. Gupta, S. Bhattacharyya, Geopolymer concrete: A review of some recent developments, Construction and building materials, 85 (2015) 78-90
  9. A. Palomo, M. Grutzeck, M. Blanco, Alkali-activated fly ashes: A cement for the future, Cement and concrete research, 29 (1999) 1323- 1329
  10. P.K. Mehta, R.W. Burrows, Building durable structures in the 21st century, Concrete international, 23 (2001) 57-63
  11. E.M.S. Mulapeer, Strength And Absorptıon Characterıstıcs Of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Composıte Reınforced Wıth Glass Fıber, Hasan Kalyoncu Üniversitesi, 2016
  12. R. El-Hachem, E. Rozière, F. Grondin, A. Loukili, Multi-criteria analysis of the mechanism of degradation of Portland cement based mortars exposed to external sulphate attack, Cement and Concrete Research, 42 (2012) 1327-1335
  13. T. Bakharev, Durability of geopolymer materials in sodium and magnesium sulfate solutions, Cement and Concrete Research, 35 (2005) 1233-1246
  14. S. Thokchom, D. Dutta, S. Ghosh, Effect of incorporating silica fume in fly ash geopolymers, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 60 (2011) 243-247
  15. A. Fernández-Jiménez, I. García-Lodeiro, A. Palomo, Durability of alkali-activated fly ash cementitious materials, Journal of Materials Science, 42 (2007) 3055-3065
  16. V. Sata, A. Sathonsaowaphak, P. Chindaprasirt, Resistance of l