SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

Adventitious and Normal Respiratory Sound Analysis with Machine Learning Methods

Yavuz HAVLUCU
Burcu ACAR DEMİRCİ
Yücel KOÇYİĞİT
Deniz KIZILIRMAK
Pages
169–180
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The best accuracy was 98.8% by using combination Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficient and k Nearest Neighbor methods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The computerized respiratory sound analysis systems provide vital information concerning the current condition of the lung.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These systems, used by physicians for the diagnosis of diseases, help to classify respiratory sounds.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The best accuracy was 98.8% by using combination Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficient and k Nearest Neighbor methods.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Respiratory sound · mel-frequency cepstral coefficient · empirical mode decomposition

Abstract

The computerized respiratory sound analysis systems provide vital information concerning the current condition of the lung. These systems, used by physicians for the diagnosis of diseases, help to classify respiratory sounds. Because each physician has different knowledge and experience, there is a problem with diagnosing and treating respiratory system diseases. This study will help the physician to decide in various difficult diagnostic situations easily. For this purpose, different machine learning classifiers and feature extraction models have been constituted to classify respiratory sounds as healthy and patient then its results were compared. In this study, Empirical Mode Decomposition, Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients, and Wavelet Transform methods are used for feature extraction, while k Nearest Neighbor, Artificial Neural Networks, and Support Vector Machines are used for classification. The best accuracy was 98.8% by using combination Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficient and k Nearest Neighbor methods.

🔖

Cite This Article

HAVLUCU, Y., DEMİRCİ, B. A., KOÇYİĞİT, Y., KIZILIRMAK, D. (2022). Adventitious and Normal Respiratory Sound Analysis with Machine Learning Methods. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 169–180. https://ajindex.com/articles/472076

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. World Health Organization. The Top 10 Causes of Death n.d. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death (accessed March 20, 2020)
  2. Güler I, Polat H, Ergün U. 2005. Combining neural network and genetic algorithm for prediction of lung sounds. Journal of Medical Systems; 29:217–31. doi: 10.1007/s10916-005-5182-9
  3. Polat H, Güler I. 2004. A simple computer-based measurement and analysis system of pulmonary auscultation sounds. Journal of Medical Systems; 28: 665–72. doi: 10.1023/B:JOMS.0000044968.45013.ce
  4. Rocha BM, Filos D, Mendes L, Serbes G, Ulukaya S, Kahya YP, et al. 2019. An open access database for the evaluation of respiratory sound classification algorithms. Physiological Measurement; 40. doi:10.1088/1361-6579/ab03ea
  5. Homs-Corbera A, Fiz JA, Morera J, Jané R. 2004. Time-Frequency Detection and Analysis of Wheezes During Forced Exhalation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering; 51: 182–186. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2003.820359
  6. Sezgin MC, Dokur Z, Olmez T, Korurek M. Classification of respiratory sounds by using an artificial neural network. 2001 Proceedings of the 23rd Annual EMBS International Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, 2001, pp. 697-699. doi:10.1109/IEMBS.2001.1019035
  7. Maruf SO, Azhar MU, Khawaja SG, Akram MU. Crackle separation and classification from normal respiratory sounds using Gaussian Mixture Model. 2015 IEEE 10th International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems, Sri Lanka, 2015, pp. 267-271 doi: 10.1109/ICIINFS.2015.7399022 [8] Lozano M, Fiz JA, Jané R. 2016. Performance evaluation of the Hilbert-Huang transform for respiratory sound analysis and its application to continuous adventitious sound characterization. Signal Processing; 120: 99–116. doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2015.09.005
  8. Palaniappan R, Sundaraj K, Sundaraj S. 2014. A comparative study of the svm and k-nn machine learning algorithms for the diagnosis of respiratory pathologies using pulmonary acoustic signals. BMC Bioinformatics; 15:223. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-15-223
  9. Sengupta N, Sahidullah M, Saha G. 2016. Lung sound classification using cepstral-based statistical features. Computers in Biology and Medicine; 75: 118–29. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.05.013
  10. Liu Y, Lin Y, Zhang X, Wang Z, Gao Y, Chen G, et al. Classifying respiratory sounds using electronic stethoscope. 2017 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence& Computing, Advanced& Trusted Computed, Scalable Computing& Communications, Cloud& B