SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi / 2021 / Sayı: 23

Evaulation of Wind Turbine Tower Alternatives With Multi Criteria Decision Making Method

Rüzgar Türbin Kulesi Alternatiflerinin Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri İle Değerlendirilmesi

Muhammet Ensar YİĞİT
Muhammet Enes AKPINAR
Pages
386–393
Publication Date
2021-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the study, the hybrid type tower came to the fore in terms of recycling, maintenance, operation and installation convenience, as well as displacement and stress values.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:One of the biggest natural energy sources in renewable energy is undoubtedly wind energy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In some cases, tribune towers of 10 meters can be used to meet smaller needs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the study, the hybrid type tower came to the fore in terms of recycling, maintenance, operation and installation convenience, as well as displacement and stress values.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çok Kriterli Karar Verme · Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci · Rüzgar Türbin Kuleleri

Abstract

One of the biggest natural energy sources in renewable energy is undoubtedly wind energy. Huge-sized wind turbine towers are used for wind energy. In some cases, tribune towers of 10 meters can be used to meet smaller needs. These towers can be composed of structures such as steel, hybrid and reinforced concrete. Within the scope of this study, three different types of wind turbine towers was selected using the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (BAHS) method which is one of the multi-criteria decision making methods. In addition to the analysis of installation and maintenance costs, criteria such as recycling rates and economic life are taken into account in this study. According to these criteria, different most suitable wind turbine was analyzed with BAHS method and the most suitable tower type was selected. As a result of the study, the hybrid type tower came to the fore in terms of recycling, maintenance, operation and installation convenience, as well as displacement and stress values.

Özet

Yenilenebilir enerjinin öneminin daha fazla ön plana çıktığı 21. yüzyılda, en büyük doğal enerji kaynaklarından birisi de hiç kuşkusuz rüzgar enerjisidir. Rüzgar enerjisi için büyük boyutlarda rüzgar tribünlerine ihtiyaç vardır. Bazı durumlarda ise daha küçük ihtiyaçları gidermek için 10m boyutlarında tribün kuleleri kullanılabilmektedir. Bu kuleler çelik, hibrit, betonarme gibi çok farklı şekilde yapılardan oluşabilmektedir. Bu çalışma kapsamında üç farklı tip rüzgâr türbini kulelerinin Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (BAHS) yöntemiyle seçimi üzerine bir probleme değinilmiştir. Kurulum ve bakım maliyetlerinin yanı sıra ekonomik ömrü sonundaki geri dönüşüm oranları gibi kriterler bu çalışmada dikkate alınmıştır. Bu kriterlere göre farklı en uygun rüzgar tribünü BAHS metodu ile analiz edilmiş ve en uygun kule tipinin seçimi yapılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda gerek geri dönüşüm, bakım işletme ve montaj kolaylığı gerekse deplasman ve gerilme değerleri bakımından hibrit tipi kule ön plana çıkmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YİĞİT, M. E., AKPINAR, M. E. (2021). Evaulation of Wind Turbine Tower Alternatives With Multi Criteria Decision Making Method. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Sayı: 23, 386–393. https://ajindex.com/articles/471469

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abbate, G.B., (2013), Optimal Control for Fatigue Reduction of a Ballast-Stabilized Floating Wind Turbine, Department of Electronic Systems, Allborg University, Denmark, 2013. Arslan T., & Khirsty, J., (2006), A Rational Approach to Hand-ling Fuzzy Perceptions in Route Choice, Europen Journal of Ope-rational Research, vol.:168(29), pp: 571-583.
  2. Artun, O., (2020), Determination of the Suitable Areas for The Investment of the Wind Energy Plants (WEP) in Osmaniye Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS). Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, (20), 196-205.
  3. Che, Z., Wang, H., & Chuang, C.L., (2010), A Fuzzy AHP and DEA Approach for Making Bank Loan Decisions For Small and Medium Enterprises in Taiwan, Expert Systems with Applications, vol.:37(10), pp: 7189-7199.
  4. Chang, D.Y., (1996), Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP, European Journal of Operational Research, vol.:95, pp: 649-655.
  5. Gkantou, M., Baniotopoulos, C., & Martinez-Vazquez P., (2017)., Tall Hybrid Wind Turbine Towers Load Analysis and Structural Response, The International Conference on wind Enerfy Harvesting-2017, paper 209, pp:87-90,
  6. Coimbra, Portugal, 20‐21 April 2017.
  7. Harte, R., Gideon P.A.G., & Zijl, V., (2007), Structural Stability of Concrete Wind Turbines and Solar Towers Exposed to Dynamic Wind Action, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, vol.: 95, pp: 1079-1096.
  8. Kanbur, F.A., (2014), Steel Tower Design for a 500 KW Wind Turbine, istanbul Technical University, Graduate Scholl of Natural, The Degree of Master Thesis, istanbul, Turkey. Kocer, F.Y. & Arora, J.S., (1996), Design of Prestressed Concrete Transmission Poles: Optimization Approach, Journal of Structural Engineering 122, no. 7 (July), pp: 804-814.
  9. Krishnendu, S., Ravi, S., Surendra, S.Y., & Lakshman, S.T., (2012), Supplier Selection Using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy Multi-Objective Linear Programming for Developing low Carbon Supply Chain, Expert Systems with Applications, vol: 39(9), pp: 8182-8192.
  10. Laxson, A., (2001), WindPACT Turbine Design Scaling Studies Technical Area 3-Self-Erecting Tower and Nacelle Feasibility, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), March 2001.
  11. Lewin, T.J., (2010), An Investigation of Design Alternatives for 328-ft (100-m) Tall Wind Turbine Towers, The Degree of Master Thesis, Iowa State University, Iowa, USA. Lin, H.F., (2010), An Application of Fuzzy AHP for Evaluating Eour-seWebsite Quality, Computers & Education, vol.:54(4), pp: 87