Journals / Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi / 2020 / Ejosat Özel Sayı 2020 (ICCEES)

Evaluation and Comparison of Electromagnetic and Scattering Parameters Data of Two Microstrip Patch Antennas Operating in ISM Band for Cancer Detection

Kanser Hastalığı Tespitine Yönelik ISM Bandında Çalışan Mikroşerit Yama Yapılı İki Antenin Elektromanyetik Alan ve Saçılma Parametreleri Verilerinin Değerlendirilmesi ve Kıyaslanması

Pages
237–244
Publication Date
2020-10-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, it is possible to say that it is more advantageous to use the 2.45 GHz frequency in antenna structures used for this purpose compared to the 5.8 GHz radiation area.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Cancer diseases significantly affect lives of many people for last years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Electromagnetic field and scattering parameter data of two antennas operating in the 2.45 GHz and 5.8 GHz operating frequency in ISM (Industrial, Scientific and Medical) band region are analyzed and compared.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, it is possible to say that it is more advantageous to use the 2.45 GHz frequency in antenna structures used for this purpose compared to the 5.8 GHz radiation area.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kanser Tespiti · Mikroşerit Yama Anten · Elektrik Alan

Abstract

Cancer diseases significantly affect lives of many people for last years. The diagnosis and treatment process is quite difficult and painful. It is especially important to reach the result of pathological tissue samples in which the structure of the cancerous tissue is determined and helps to shape the treatment in a short time. Today, it may take days or even months to obtain these results. In this study, microstrip antenna structures that are frequently used due to many advantages in biomedical applications are studied. Electromagnetic field and scattering parameter data of two antennas operating in the 2.45 GHz and 5.8 GHz operating frequency in ISM (Industrial, Scientific and Medical) band region are analyzed and compared. Pathological sample transformed form of tumor and normal skin tissue is simulated and compared in Ansys' HFSS program. Both the electric field values and the S-parameter values were compared by obtaining the values of both antennas at 2.45 GHz and 5.8 GHz from simulations. When looking at the results obtained, the difference rates in the data obtained from the antenna results radiating in the 2.45 GHz region are higher as a percentage. Thus, it is possible to say that it is more advantageous to use the 2.45 GHz frequency in antenna structures used for this purpose compared to the 5.8 GHz radiation area.

Özet

Kanser hastalıkları günümüzde birçok insanın hayatını önemli ölçüde etkilemektedir. Teşhis ve tedavi süreci ise oldukça zor ve ağrılıdır. Özellikle kanserli dokunun yapısının belirlendiği ve tedavinin şekillenmesine yardımcı olan patolojik doku örneklerinin sonucuna kısa sürede ulaşmak önemlidir. Günümüzde bu sonuçlara ulaşmak günler hatta aylar sürebilmektedir. Bu çalışmada biyomedikal uygulamalarda birçok avantajı sebebi ile sıkça kullanılan mikroşerit anten yapıları çalışılmaktadır. ISM band bölgesinde bulunan 2.45 GHz ve 5.8 GHz ışıma bölgelerinde çalışan iki adet antenin elektromanyetik alan ve saçılma parametre verileri incelenmekte ve kıyaslanmaktadır. Tümörlü ve normal deri dokusunun patolojik numune dönüştürülmüş hali Ansys’in HFSS programında simüle edilerek kıyaslanmaktadır. Her iki antenin hem 2.45 GHz’deki hem de 5.8 GHz’deki değerleri simülasyonlardan elde edilerek hem elektrik alan değerleri hem de S-parametre değerleri kıyaslanmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara bakıldığında, 2.45 GHz bölgesinde ışıma yapan anten sonuçlarından elde edilen verilerdeki farklılık oranları yüzde olarak daha fazladır. Böylelikle bu amaçla kullanılan anten yapılarında 2.45 GHz ışıma bölgesini kullanmanın 5.8 GHz ışıma bölgesini kullanmaya göre daha avantajlı olduğunu söylemek mümkündür.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOP, R., GÜLTEKİN, S. S., UZER, D. (2020). Evaluation and Comparison of Electromagnetic and Scattering Parameters Data of Two Microstrip Patch Antennas Operating in ISM Band for Cancer Detection. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Ejosat Özel Sayı 2020 (ICCEES), 237–244. https://ajindex.com/articles/471381

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Asif, S. M., Hansen, J. W., Iftikhar, A., Ewert, D. L., & Braaten, B. D. (2019). Computation of available RF power inside the body and path loss using in vivo experiments. IET Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation, 13(1), 122–126. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-map.2018.5582
  2. Bao, Z. (2019). Comparative Study of Dual-Polarized and Circularly-Polarized Antennas at 2.45 GHz for Ingestible Capsules. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 67(3), 1488–1500. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2018.2888819
  3. Caspers, F. (2011). RF engineering basic concepts: S-parameters. CAS 2010 - CERN Accelerator School: RF for Accelerators, Proceedings, (June), 67–93.
  4. Dey, S, Letters, R. M.-M. and O. T., & 1996, undefined. (n.d.). Compact microstrip patch antenna. Wiley Online Library. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2760(199609)13:1%3C12::AID-MOP4%3E3.0.CO;2-Q?casa_token=KJKDr8IHH70AAAAA:7a_CJXaWYQtXlPvOPBJt4b8XaIyjvVSs2IvX4_hWYYSurD1AHf0PUrgYcd_x_bAySAR_q0IP_wbZvLA
  5. Dey, Supriyo, & Mittra, R. (1996). Compact microstrip patch antenna. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, 13(1), 12–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2760(199609)13:1 3.0.co;2-q Gabriel, C. (1996). Compilation of the Dielectric Properties of Body Tissues at RF and Microwave Frequencies. Environmental Health, Report No.(June), 21. https://doi.org/Report N.AL/OE-TR- 1996-0037
  6. Hasan, R. R., Shanto, M. A. H., Howlader, S., & Jahan, S. (2018). A novel design and miniaturization of a scalp implantable circular patch antenna at ISM band for biomedical application. 2017
  7. Intelligent Systems Conference, IntelliSys 2017, 2018-Janua(September), 166–169. https://doi.org/10.1109/IntelliSys.2017.8324286
  8. Jha, A. K., Akhter, Z., Tiwari, N., Muhammed Shafi, K. T., Samant, H., Jaleel Akhtar, M., & Cifra, M. (2018). Broadband Wireless Sensing System for Non-Invasive Testing of Biological Samples. IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems, 8(2), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1109/JETCAS.2018.2829205
  9. Ketavath, K. N., Gopi, D., & Rani, S. S. (2019). In-vitro test of miniaturized CPW-fed implantable conformal patch antenna at ISM band for biomedical applications. IEEE Access, 7, 43547–43554. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2905661
  10. Khan, Z., Razzaq, A., Iqbal, J., Qamar, A., & Zubair, M. (2018). Double circular ring compact antenna for ultra-wideband applications. IET Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation, 12(13), 2094–2097. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-map.2018.524