SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi / 2021 / Sayı: 32

Comparative Investigation of Mechanical, Tribological and Thermo-Mechanical Properties of Commonly Used 3D Printing Materials

Yaygın kullanılan 3B baskı malzemelerinin mekanik, termo-mekanik ve tribolojik özelliklerinin karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi

Sinan YİLMAZ
Pages
827–831
Publication Date
2021-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The variation of storage modulus values with temperature was also investigated by applying DMTA (Dynamic mechanic thermal analysis) tests to the samples.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it is aimed to comparatively examine tensile, thermomechanical, and adhesive wear properties of PLA (poly lactic acid), ABS (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene) and PETG (polyethylene terephthalate glycol) materials, which are the most widely used filament materials in 3D (three dimensional) printing technology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Mechanical tests were performed at three different temperatures, 25, 35 and 45 °C, according to the glass transition temperatures of the materials.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The variation of storage modulus values with temperature was also investigated by applying DMTA (Dynamic mechanic thermal analysis) tests to the samples.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:3B baskı teknolojisi · Triboloji · Mekanik özellikler

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to comparatively examine tensile, thermomechanical, and adhesive wear properties of PLA (poly lactic acid), ABS (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene) and PETG (polyethylene terephthalate glycol) materials, which are the most widely used filament materials in 3D (three dimensional) printing technology. The printing process was carried out by considering the mostly preferred manufacturing parameters by the end users and the options offered by the slicing software by default. Mechanical tests were performed at three different temperatures, 25, 35 and 45 °C, according to the glass transition temperatures of the materials. Determination of tribological properties, both bottom and upper surfaces of the test samples were exposed to adhesive wear by using standard pin-on disc tester. During the tensile tests, it was observed that the most sensitive material in terms of the alteration of mechanical properties with temperature was PLA, and the most stable material was ABS. It was determined that there was a significant difference in wear volume for all tested materials, depending on whether the abraded surface was top or bottom. The variation of storage modulus values with temperature was also investigated by applying DMTA (Dynamic mechanic thermal analysis) tests to the samples.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, 3B (üç boyutlu) baskı teknolojisinde filaman malzemesi olarak en yaygın kullanılan PLA (poli laktik asit), ABS (akrilonitril bütadien stiren) ve PETG (polietilen tereftalat glikol) malzemelerinin çekme, termo-mekanik ve adhezif aşınma özelliklerinin karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Baskı prosesi, son kullanıcıların en çok tercih ettiği imalat parametreleri ve dilimleme yazılımının varsayılan olarak sunduğu seçenekler dikkate alınarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Mekanik testler, malzemelerin camsı geçiş sıcaklıkları dikkate alınarak 25, 35 ve 45 °C olmak üzere üç farklı sıcaklıkta uygulanmıştır. Tribolojik özelliklerin belirlenmesi için numunelerin hem alt hem de üst yüzeyleri standart pin-on disk test cihazı kullanılarak adhezif aşınmaya maruz bırakılmıştır. Çekme testleri boyunca mekanik özelliklerin sıcaklıkla değişimi açısından en hassas malzemenin PLA, en kararlı malzemenin ise ABS olduğu gözlenmiştir. Numunelere DMTA (Dinamik Mekanik Termal Analiz) testleri uygulanarak depo modülü değerlerinin sıcaklıkla değişimi de incelenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YİLMAZ, S. (2021). Comparative Investigation of Mechanical, Tribological and Thermo-Mechanical Properties of Commonly Used 3D Printing Materials. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Sayı: 32, 827–831. https://ajindex.com/articles/470233

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Aguilera-Camacho, L. D., Hernández-Navarro, C., Moreno, K. J., García-Miranda, J. S., & Arizmendi-Morquecho, A. (2015). Improvement effects of CaO nanoparticles on tribological and microhardness properties of PMMA coating. Journal of Coatings Technology and Research, 12(2), 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-014-9639-y
  2. Alafaghani, A., Qattawi, A., Alrawi, B., & Guzman, A. (2017). Experimental Optimization of Fused Deposition Modelling Processing Parameters: A Design-for-Manufacturing Approach. Procedia Manufacturing, 10, 791–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.079
  3. Caminero, M. A., Chacón, J. M., García-Moreno, I., & Rodríguez, G. P. (2018). Impact damage resistance of 3D printed continuous fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modelling. Composites Part B: Engineering, 148(April), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.054 Chacón, J. M., Caminero, M. A., García-Plaza, E., & Núñez, P. J. (2017). Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: Effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection. Materials and Design, 124, 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.065
  4. Dizon, J. R. C., Espera, A. H., Chen, Q., & Advincula, R. C. (2018). Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers. Additive Manufacturing, 20, 44–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.002
  5. Harikrishnan, U., & Soundarapandian, S. (2018). Fused Deposition Modelling based Printing of Full Complement Bearings. Procedia Manufacturing, 26, 818–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.102
  6. Kane, S. R., Ashby, P. D., & Pruitt, L. A. (2010). Characterization and tribology of PEG-like coatings on UHMWPE for total hip replacements. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A, 92(4), 1500–1509. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32484
  7. Karsli, N. G., Demirkol, S., & Yilmaz, T. (2016). Thermal aging and reinforcement type effects on the tribological, thermal, thermomechanical, physical and morphological properties of poly(ether ether ketone) composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 88, 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.11.013
  8. Kousiatza, C., & Karalekas, D. (2016). In-situ monitoring of strain and temperature distributions during fused deposition modeling process. Materials and Design, 97, 400–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.099
  9. Mohan, N., Senthil, P., Vinodh, S., & Jayanth, N. (2017). A review on composite materials and process parameters