SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bozok Tıp Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

A Different Overview of the Medical Nutritional Therapy of Diabetes Mellitus: Glycemic Index or Glycemic Load, Which is More Effective in the Planning of the Dietary Therapy?

DİABETES MELLİTUS'UN TIBBİ BESLENME TEDAVİSİNE FARKLI BİR BAKIŞ: GLİSEMİK İNDEKS Mİ, GLİSEMİK YÜK MÜ DAHA ETKİNDİR?

Aslı BAYRAKTAR
Seçil Ünal EŞİNGEN
Gamze AKBULUT
Fatma Nur BİNGÖL
Pages
42–49
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Within the scope of all this data, it is concluded that more studies are needed to further elaborate on the relation between glycemic index, glycemic load and diabetes mellitus.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Modern life has changed individuals dietary habits and causes to rely more on the consumption of high starchy (carbohydrate) foods leading to increased risk of chronic diseases such as Diabetes Mellitus.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The highest impact factor in the dietary intake of carbohydrates is glycemic control.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Within the scope of all this data, it is concluded that more studies are needed to further elaborate on the relation between glycemic index, glycemic load and diabetes mellitus.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Modern life has changed individuals dietary habits and causes to rely more on the consumption of high starchy (carbohydrate) foods leading to increased risk of chronic diseases such as Diabetes Mellitus. The highest impact factor in the dietary intake of carbohydrates is glycemic control. Many studies conducted on diabetic subjects showed that low glycemic index diets are effective for short term of glycemic control. Recent studies, on the other hand, suggest that glycemic load should also be evaluated along with glycemic index. Some studies put forward positive impacts of glycemic index on diabetes mellitus while some others emphasise the need to consider glycemic load as well. Within the scope of all this data, it is concluded that more studies are needed to further elaborate on the relation between glycemic index, glycemic load and diabetes mellitus.

Özet

Modern yaşam, beslenme alışkanlıklarını değiştirerek yüksek karbonhidratlı yiyecek tü- ketimine ve diyabet gibi kronik hastalıklara yakalanma riskinde artışa neden olmaktadır. Diyetle karbonhidrat alımı, glisemik kontrole en fazla etki eden diyetsel faktördür. Diyabe- tik bireylerle yapılan birçok çalışma, düşük glisemik indeksli diyetlerin kısa süreli glisemik kontrolün sağlanmasında yararlı olduğunu göstermektedir. Yapılan son çalışmalarda ise glisemik indeksin yanında glisemik yükün de değerlendirilmesi gerektiği vurgulanmakta- dır. Çalışmaların bir kısmı glisemik indeksin diyabet üzerindeki olumlu etkisini gösterirken, bir kısmı da glisemik yükün de değerlendirmeye katılması gerektiği sonucuna ulaşmıştır. Tüm bu veriler ışığında; glisemik indeks, glisemik yük ve diyabet arasındaki ilişki ile ilgili daha fazla çalışma yapılması gerektiği düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYRAKTAR, A., EŞİNGEN, S. Ü., AKBULUT, G., BİNGÖL, F. N. (2022). A Different Overview of the Medical Nutritional Therapy of Diabetes Mellitus: Glycemic Index or Glycemic Load, Which is More Effective in the Planning of the Dietary Therapy?. Bozok Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 42–49. https://ajindex.com/articles/468999

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Bozkurt, N. Diabetes Mellitus’da Beslenme. Diyet El Kitabı. Hatipoğlu Yayınevi, Ankara, 2002;116
  2. Oğuz A, Gedik O, Hatemi H. Glycemic control of Turkish adult diabetic patients. Turkish Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism 2008; (12):50-4
  3. Alphan E. Posanın Glisemik Kontroldeki Önemi. VI. Uluslararası Beslenme ve Diyetetik Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, Ankara, Bayt Yayınevi. 2008; 54-8
  4. Nutrition Recommendations and Interventions for Diabetes. A Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2008, 31(1): 61- 78
  5. Arvidsson-Lenner R, Asp ND, Axelsen M. Glycemic Index. Scandinavian Journal of Nutrition 2004; 48(2): 84-95
  6. Brouns F, BjorckI, Frayn KN, Gibbs AL, Lang V, Slama G. Glycaemic index methodology. Nutr Res Rev 2005; 18(1): 145-71
  7. DeVries, J.W. Glycemic Index: The analytical perspective. Cereal Foods World 2007; 52(2): 45-9
  8. Jenkins DJ, Wolever TM, Taylor RH, Barker H, Fielden H, Baldwin JM, et al. Glycemic index of foods: a physiological basis for carbohydrate exchange. Am J Clin Nutr 1981; 34: 362-6
  9. Greer F, Hudson R, Ross R, Graham T. Caffeine Ingestion Decreases Glucose Disposal During a Hyperinsulinemic Euglycemic Clamp in Sedentary Humans. Diabetes 2001; 50(10): 2349-54
  10. Wolever TMS. Carbohydrate and the Regulation of Blood Glucose and Metabolism. Nutr Rev 2003; 61(5 Pt 2): 40-8
  11. Malkova D, Evans R, Frayn KN, Humphreys SM, Jones PRM, et al. Prior exercise and postprandial substrate extraction across the human leg. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2000; 279(5): 1020-8
  12. Shelmet J, Reichard GA, Skutches CL, Hoeldtke RD, Owen OE, Boden G. Ethanol Causes Acute Inhibition of Carbohydrate, Fat, and Protein Oxidation and Insulin Resistance. J Clin Invest 1988;81(4): 1137-45
  13. Artvall S, Fowelin J, Lager I, Von Schenck H, Smith U. Smoking induces insulin resistance-a potential link with the insulin resistance syndrome. Journal of International Medicine 1993; 233(4): 327-32 14. Robertson MD, Henderson RA, Vist GE, Rumsey RDE. Extended effects of evening meal carbohydrate- to-fat ratio on fasting and postprandial substrate metabolism. Am J Clin Nutr 2002; 75(3): 505–10
  14. Köksal G. Glisemik İndeks ve Glisemik Yükün Kardiovasküler Hastalıkların Tıbbi Beslenme Tedavisindeki Yeri ve Etkinliği. Oto MA. (ed), Merdol TK. (konuk ed), Türk Kardiyoloji Seminerleri 2008; 8(2): 194-205
  15. Sayalsan A. Sağlıklı Beslenme Açısından Gıdaların Glisemik İndeksi. Gıda 2005; 10(1): 84-91
  16. Foster-Powe