SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bozok Tıp Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Determination of Normal Cephalometric Values of Adults Turkish Society Living in Anatolia

ANADOLU'DA YAŞAYAN YETİŞKİN TÜRK TOPLUMUNDA YÜZÜN NORMAL SEFALOMETRİK DEĞERLERİNİN BELİRLENMESİ

Aslı BAYSAL
Harun ÜLGER
Mehtap NİSARİ
Şerife ALPA
Elif TARIM ERTAŞ
Pages
63–70
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Soft and hard tissue measurements values of the males are higher than the women (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the facial values of Turkish adults were determined and the differences between male and female individuals were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The measurements have been done on 76 participants aged between 18 and 29 from both sexes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Soft and hard tissue measurements values of the males are higher than the women (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the facial values of Turkish adults were determined and the differences between male and female individuals were investigated. The measurements have been done on 76 participants aged between 18 and 29 from both sexes. Six measurement from hard and six measurements from soft tissue were taken on the lateral cephalometric films. Soft and hard tissue measurements values of the males are higher than the women (p

Özet

Bu çalışmada yetişkin Türk bireylerde yüze ait değerler tespit edilerek erkek ve kadın bireyler arasındaki farklılıklar araştırıldı. Araştırmaya yaşları 18-29 arasında olan 76 birey dahil edildi. Bireylere ait lateral sefalometrik filmler üzerinden 6 ölçüm sert dokudan, 6 ölçüm yumuşak dokudan alındı. Erkek bireylerde yumuşak ve sert doku üzerinde alınan ölçüm değerleri kadınlardan daha yüksekti (p

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYSAL, A., ÜLGER, H., NİSARİ, M., ALPA, Ş., ERTAŞ, E. T. (2022). Determination of Normal Cephalometric Values of Adults Turkish Society Living in Anatolia. Bozok Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 63–70. https://ajindex.com/articles/468724

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Porter JP, Olson KL. Anthropometric facial analysis of the African American woman. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2001;3(3): 191-197
  2. NFarkas LG. Anthropometry of the Head and Face. New York, NY: Ravenpress; 1994
  3. Karakaş S, Kavaklı A, Uzun A ve ark. Malatya merkez ilkokul öğrencilerinin yüz ve kulak ile ilgili antropometrik ölçümlerinin incelenmesi. Turgut Özal Tıp Merkezi Dergisi 1999; 6(3):24-27
  4. Al-Gunaid T, Yamada K, Yamaki M et al. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in Yemeni men. Am J Orthod. Dento facial Orthop 2007;132(5):576.e7-14
  5. Loi H, Nakata S, Nakasima A, et al. Comparasion of cephalometric norms between Japanese and Caucasian adults in antero-posterior and vertical dimension. Eur J Orthod 2007;29:493-499
  6. Enöz M, Yanardağ H, Güven M. Osas'lı hastaların üst solunum yollarının değerlendirilmesindeki kullanılan teknikler. KBB-Forum 2006;5(3)
  7. Uzel İ, Enacar A. Ortodontide Sefalometri, 1. basım, Yargıçoğlu Matbaası, İstanbul, 1984. ss 10-14
  8. Ruhi N, Gökhan Ö: Arnett yumuşak doku sefalometrik analizi. S.D.Ü Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2012;3(2):96-102
  9. Budai M, Farkas LG, Tompson B et al. Relation between anthropometric and cephalometric measurements and proportions of the face of healthy young white adult men and women. J Craniofac Surgery 2003;14(2):154-161;162- 163
  10. Basciftci FA, Uysal T, Buyukerkmen A. Craniofacial structure of AnatolianTurkish adults with normal occlusionsandwell-balancedfaces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:366-372
  11. Uysal T, Malkoc S. subment over tx cephalometrik norms in Turkishadults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:729-730
  12. Baral P, Lobo SW, Menezes RG, et al. An anthropometric study of facial height among four endogamous communities in the Sunsaridistrict of Nepal. SingaporeMed J 2010;51(3):212-215
  13. Jahanshahi M, Golalipour MJ, Heidari K. Theeffect of ethnicity on facial anthropometry in Northern Iran. SingaporeMed J 2008;49(11):940-943
  14. Farkas LG, Tompson BD, Katic MJ, et al. Differences between direct (anthropometric) andindirect (cephalometric) measurements of theskull. J CraniofacSurg 2002; 13: 105-108
  15. Choe KS, Sclafani AP, Litner JA, et al. The Korean American woman'sface: anthropometric measurements and quantitativeanalysis of facialaesthetics. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004;6(4):244-252
  16. Uysal T, Sari Z. Posteroanterior cephalometrik norms in Turkishadults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:324-332
  17. Hasusta A. 12-15 Yaş Grubunda direk