Journals / Bozok Tıp Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Comparison Of The Effects Of Ibandronic Acid and Calcium-D Vitamin Treatment On Osteointegration

İBANDRONİK ASİT VE KALSİYUM-D VİTAMİNİ TEDAVİSİNİN OSTEOİNTEGRASYON ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Pages
102–111
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However further clinical studies are needed to support results of this experimental study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of ibandronate and calcium-vitamin D complex on osteointegration of metal implants histomorphometrically and mechanically.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: The study was performed on 45 female Sprague-Dawley rats.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However further clinical studies are needed to support results of this experimental study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of ibandronate and calcium-vitamin D complex on osteointegration of metal implants histomorphometrically and mechanically. Material and Method: The study was performed on 45 female Sprague-Dawley rats. Rats were divided into three groups. Intramedullary nailing was performed in all rat’s left femurs with a stainless steel K-wire in 1 mm diameter. The rats in Group A, the control group, didn’t receive any medication after the intramedullary nailing of left femur. The rats in Group B received calcium and 25IU vitamin D daily; in Group C received single dosage ibandronate subcutaneously after intramedullary nailing of left femurs. At the end of six weeks all the rats were sacrificed. Maximum pull out strenghts were measured for all K wires and the mean maximum pull out strenghts were calculated for each group. Hystomorphometrically the thickness of the new bone around the K wire was measured and proportioned to the thickness of the K wire to get the novel osteointegration index(Oint-E) for each group. Results: There were no statistically significantly difference between Group A and Group B with regard to Oint-E (p=0,172) and mean pull out strength(p=0,828). The mean pull out strength and Oint-E for Group C, ibandronate medication group, were higher when compared with Group A and B with a statistically significant difference (for mean pull out strengths p=0,001 for Group A, p=0,001 for Group B; for Oint-E p=0,009 for Group A, p=0,016 for Group B). Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrated that ibandronate has a significant positive effect on bone metal implant integration. We believe that ibandronate can be used postoperatively to augment osteointegration of metal implants. However further clinical studies are needed to support results of this experimental study.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada ibandronik asit ve kalsiyum- D vitamini kompleksinin osteointegrasyon üzerine olanetkilerini histomorfometrik ve mekanik olarak değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışma 45 adet dişi Sprague-Dawley cinsi ratın sol femurları üzerinde yapılmıştır. Cerrahiolarak ratların sol femurlarına intramedüller K teli yerleştirilmiştir. Ratlar rasgele eşit sayıda olacak şekildekontrol grubu, ibandronat alan grup ve Ca+D vitamini alan grup olacak şekilde gruplandırılmıştır. Altı haftasonra sakrifiye edilen ratların femurları mekanik teste ve histomorfometrik inceleme tabi tutulmuştur. Eldeedilen veriler istatistiksel olarak kıyaslanmıştır.Bulgular: Grup A (kontrol) ve Grup B (Ca+D vitamini) arasında ortalama maksimum çekme gücü ve osteo-integrasyon endeksi açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık yoktu (maksimum çekme için p=0,828,OintE için p=0,172). İbandronik asit verilen Grup C için ortalama maksimum çekme gücü ve osteointegras-yon endeksi Grup A ve Grup B ile kıyaslandığında elde edilen değerin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecedeyüksek olduğu saptandı (Maksimum çekme gücü için grup A’da p=0,001, grup B’de p=0,001, OintE için grupA’ da p=0,009, grup B’de p=0,016)Sonuç: Bu çalışma ibandronatın metal implant-kemik tutunumu üzerinde belirgin bir olumlu etkiye sahipolduğunu göstermektedir. Ancak, bu deneysel çalışmanın sonuçlarını destekleyecek ileri klinik çalışmalaraihtiyaç vardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, T., YALÇINOZAN, M., DURUSOY, S., ASLAN, A., BALCI, M., ÇIRPAR, M. (2022). Comparison Of The Effects Of Ibandronic Acid and Calcium-D Vitamin Treatment On Osteointegration. Bozok Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 102–111. https://ajindex.com/articles/468633

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Brånemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental back- ground. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50:399–410.
  2. Mavrogenis a F, Dimitriou R, Parvizi J, Babis GC. Biology of implant osseointegration. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact [Inter- net]. 2009;9:61–71. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/19516081 Reid DM. Osteoporosis, Handbook. Clinics RO. Hastalarda Osteoporoz ‹ nsidans ›. 2010;10–3.
  3. Fini M, Giavaresi G, Torricelli P, Borsari V, Giardino R, Nicolini a, et al. Osteoporosis and biomaterial osteointegration. Biomed Pharmacother [Internet]. 2004 Dec [cited 2013 Dec 31];58:487–93. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15511604 Raisz LG. Physiology and pathophysiology of bone remodeling. Clin Chem [Internet]. 1999 Aug;45(8 Pt 2):1353–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10430818 Ochsner PE. Osteointegration of orthopaedic devices. Se- min Immunopathol [Internet]. 2011 May [cited 2013 Dec 31];33(3):245–56. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/21253729 Macinnes SJ, Gordon A, Wilkinson JM. Risk Factors for Aseptic Loosening Following Total Hip Arthroplasty. 1960;
  4. Austin MS, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH. Knee failure Mechanisms after Total Knee Arthroplasty. 2004;3(1):55–9.
  5. Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Bennett D, Delanois RE, Saleh KJ, Thong- trangan I, et al. Total hip arthroplasties: what are the reasons for revision? Int Orthop [Internet]. 2008 Oct [cited 2014 Jan 28];32(5):597–604. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih. gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2551710&tool=pmcentrez&rendertyp e=abstract Davies JE. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J Dent Educ [Internet]. 2003 Aug;67(8):932–49. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12959168
  6. Franchi M, Fini M, Martini D, Orsini E, Leonardi L, Ruggeri a, et al. Biological fixation of endosseous implants. Micron [Internet]. 2005 Jan [cited 2013 Dec 19];36(7–8):665–71. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16233979
  7. Friedman RJ, Hirst P, Poss R, Kelley K, Sledge CB. Results of revi- sion total knee arthroplasty performed for aseptic loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res [Internet]. 1990 Jun;(255):235–41. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2347157 Clement AND. Results of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Per- formed for Aseptic Loosening. 1984;235–41.
  8. Sundfeldt M, Carlsson L V, Johansson CB, Thomsen P, Gretzer C. Aseptic loosening, not only a question of wear: a review of dif- ferent theories. Acta Orthop [Internet]. 20