Journals / Bozok Tıp Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4

The Relationship Between Infertility With Sociocultural and Economic Situation

İNFERTİLİTENİN SOSYOKÜLTÜREL VE EKONOMİK DURUMLA İLİŞKİSİ

Pages
117–123
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The mean age of infertile women was 27.8 ± 5.2 years, 32.0 ± 5.1 years in the control group, and there was a statistically significant difference between the groups (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study is to compare sociocultural and economic status of infertile and fertile women and to determine their role in etiology of infertility.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: A questionnaire was applied to 64 infertile and 65 non-infertile totally 129 women who were admitted to the gynecology outpatient clinic of Bozok University Faculty of Medicine.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The mean age of infertile women was 27.8 ± 5.2 years, 32.0 ± 5.1 years in the control group, and there was a statistically significant difference between the groups (p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to compare sociocultural and economic status of infertile and fertile women and to determine their role in etiology of infertility. Material and Method: A questionnaire was applied to 64 infertile and 65 non-infertile totally 129 women who were admitted to the gynecology outpatient clinic of Bozok University Faculty of Medicine. This questionnaire consists of 16 questions that question age, job, education and financial status, family type, frequency of sexual intercourse, duration of infertility, awareness of ovulation time and stress level. Results: The mean age of infertile women was 27.8 ± 5.2 years, 32.0 ± 5.1 years in the control group, and there was a statistically significant difference between the groups (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı; infertil ve fertil kadınların sosyokültürel ve ekonomik durumlarını karşılaştırmak, bu etkilerin infertilite etyolojisindeki yerini belirlemektir.Gereç ve Yöntem: Bozok Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi jinekoloji polikliniğine başvuran 64 infertil ve65 infertil olmayan toplam 129 kadına anket uygulanmıştır. Bu anket yaş, meslek, eğitim ve gelir düzeyiyanında aile tipi, ilişki sıklığı, infertilite süresi, ovulasyon zamanı farkındalığı ve stres düzeyini sorgulayan 16sorudan oluşmaktadır.Bulgular: İnfertil kadınların yaş ortalaması 27.8±5.2, kontrol grubunun 32.0±5.1 idi ve gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık vardı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KIRMIZI, D. A., BAŞER, E., ONAT, T., ÇALTEKİN, M. D., KARA, M., YALVAÇ, E. S. (2022). The Relationship Between Infertility With Sociocultural and Economic Situation. Bozok Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4, 117–123. https://ajindex.com/articles/468583

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Babore A, Stuppia L, Trumello C, Candelori C, Antonucci I. Male factor infertility and lack of openness about infertility as risk factors for depressive symptoms in males undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment in Italy. Fertility and sterility. 2017;107(4):1041-7
  2. Wiweko B, Anggraheni U, Elvira SD, Lubis HP. Distribution of stress level among infertility patients. Middle East Fertility Society Journal. 2017;22(2):145-8
  3. Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Human reproduction. 2007;22(6):1506-12
  4. Denson V. Diagnosis and management of infertility. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners. 2006;2(6):380-6
  5. Bezold G, Politch JA, Kiviat NB, Kuypers JM, Wolff H, Anderson DJ. Prevalence of sexually transmissible pathogens in semen from asymptomatic male infertility patients with and without leukocytospermia. Fertility and sterility. 2007;87(5):1087-97
  6. Folkvord S, Odegaard OA, Sundby J. Male infertility in Zimbabwe. Patient education and counseling. 2005;59(3):239-43
  7. Paavonen J, editor Sexually transmitted chlamydial infections and subfertility. International Congress Series; 2004: Elsevier
  8. Datta J, Palmer M, Tanton C, Gibson L, Jones K, Macdowall W, et al. Prevalence of infertility and help seeking among 15 000 women and men. Human Reproduction. 2016;31(9):2108-18
  9. Bushnik T, Cook JL, Yuzpe AA, Tough S, Collins J. Estimating the prevalence of infertility in Canada. Human reproduction. 2012;27(3):738-46
  10. Koçyiğit OT. İnfertilite ve sosyo-kültürel etkileri. İnsanbilim dergisi. 2012;1(1):27-37
  11. Abbey A, Halman LJ, Andrews FM. Psychosocial, treatment, and demographic predictors of the stress associated with infertility. Fertility and Sterility. 1992;57(1):122-8
  12. Dunson DB, Baird DD, Colombo B. Increased infertility with age in men and women. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2004;103(1):51-6
  13. Petraglia F, Serour GI, Chapron C. The changing prevalence of infertility. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2013;123:S4-S8
  14. Heredia M, Tenías J, Rocio R, Amparo F, Calleja M, Valenzuela J. Quality of life and predictive factors in patients undergoing assisted reproduction techniques. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2013;167(2):176-80
  15. Chachamovich JR, Chachamovich E, Ezer H, Fleck MP, Knauth D, Passos EP. Investigating quality of life an