Journals / Bozok Tıp Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

Mid-Term Results of Primary Repair and Plantaris Tendon Augmentatin Technique in Neglected Achilles Tendon Rupture

İHMAL EDİLMİŞ AŞİL TENDON RÜPTÜRLERİNDE PRİMER ONARIM VE PLANTARİS TENDONU İLE ÖGMENTASYON TEKNİĞİNİN ORTA DÖNEM SONUÇLARI

Pages
81–86
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Onepatint suffred from superfiial skin infectin which was treated successfully with antiicrobial therapy.There were no cases of deep-vein thrombosis, skin necrosis, or re-rupture.Conclusion: In neglected Achilles tendon rupture, primary repair and plantaris augmentatin technique isassociated with successful clinical and functinal outcomes at mid-term.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectie: To assess clinical and functinal outcomes of primary repair and plantaris tendon augmentatintechnique employed in neglected Achilles tendon rupture.Methods: We retrospectiely reviewed 20 patints underwent surgical treatment with primary repair andplantaris tendon augmentatin technique for neglected Achilles tendon rupture between 2011 and 2014.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Atthe last follow-up, the patints were clinically assessed by American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS)hindfoot score, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, calf circumference, single-limb heel rise test and range ofmotin in ankle.Results: Mean tie from rupture to surgery was 7.8 weeks (range 4-16 weeks).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Onepatint suffred from superfiial skin infectin which was treated successfully with antiicrobial therapy.There were no cases of deep-vein thrombosis, skin necrosis, or re-rupture.Conclusion: In neglected Achilles tendon rupture, primary repair and plantaris augmentatin technique isassociated with successful clinical and functinal outcomes at mid-term.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectie: To assess clinical and functinal outcomes of primary repair and plantaris tendon augmentatintechnique employed in neglected Achilles tendon rupture.Methods: We retrospectiely reviewed 20 patints underwent surgical treatment with primary repair andplantaris tendon augmentatin technique for neglected Achilles tendon rupture between 2011 and 2014. Atthe last follow-up, the patints were clinically assessed by American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS)hindfoot score, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, calf circumference, single-limb heel rise test and range ofmotin in ankle.Results: Mean tie from rupture to surgery was 7.8 weeks (range 4-16 weeks). The mean gap was 44 mm(range 30-75 mm). Mean postoperatie follow-up period was 62 months (range 56-84 months). At the lastfollow-up, mean AOFAS score was 93.6 (range 82-100) while VAS score was found as zero in all patints. Nosignifiant diffrence was detected in mean calf circumference and plantar flxion and dorsiflxion rangeof ankle between involved site and contralateral intact site (p=0.40; p=0.59 and p=0.68, respectiely). Onepatint suffred from superfiial skin infectin which was treated successfully with antiicrobial therapy.There were no cases of deep-vein thrombosis, skin necrosis, or re-rupture.Conclusion: In neglected Achilles tendon rupture, primary repair and plantaris augmentatin technique isassociated with successful clinical and functinal outcomes at mid-term.

Özet

Amaç: İhmal edilmiş Aşil tendon rüptürlerine uyguladığımız primer onarım ve plantaris tendonu ile ögmentasyon tekniğinin klinik ve fonksiyonel sonuçlarını değerlendirmek. Gereç ve yöntemler: Bu çalışmada 2011-2014 yılları arasında ihmal edilmiş Aşil tendon rüptürü nedeniyle, primer onarım ve plantaris tendonuyla ögmentasyon tekniği ile cerrahi tedavi uyguladığımız yirmi hasta retrospekti olarak incelendi. Hastalar son takiplerde klinik olarak Amerikan Ortopedik Ayak ve Ayak Bileği Topluluğu (AOFAS) arka ayak skoru, Vizüel Ağrı Skalası (VAS) skoru, baldır çevresi uzunluğu, topuk yükseltme test ve ayak bileği eklem hareket açıklığı dereceleri ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Yaralanma ile ameliyat arasında geçen süre ortalama 7,8 (4-16) haft olarak bulundu. Ameliyat sı- rasında tendon güdükleri arasındaki ortalama defekt miktarı 44 (30-75) mm olarak ölçüldü. Ortalama takip süresi 62 (56-84) aydı. Son takiplerde AOFAS skoru ortalaması 93,6 (86-100) olarak bulundu ve VAS skoru tüm hastalarda sıfıdı. Ortalama baldır çevresi uzunluğu, ayak bileği plantar flksiyon ve dorsiflksiyon dereceleri etkilenmemiş taraf ile karşılaştııldığında istatitisel olarak anlamlı farklılık saptanmadı (p değerleri sırasıyla 0,40-0,59-0,68). Bir hasta hariç tüm hastalar topuk yükseltme testii gerçekleştiebilmekteydi. Bir hastada antiiyoti tedavisi ile iyileşen yüzeysel cilt enfeksiyonu gözlendi. Hiçbir hastada derin ven trombozu, cilt nekrozu ve tekrar rüptür tespit edilmedi. Sonuç: İhmal edilmiş Aşil tendon rüptürlerinde, primer onarım ve plantaris tendonu ile ögmentasyon tekniği, orta dönemde, klinik ve fonksiyonel olarak başarılı sonuçlar ile ilişkilidir

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖÇGÜDER, D. A., ULUYARDIMCI, E., BEKTAŞER, S. B., YALÇIN, M. N., BOZKURT, İ., SOLAK, A. Ş. (2022). Mid-Term Results of Primary Repair and Plantaris Tendon Augmentatin Technique in Neglected Achilles Tendon Rupture. Bozok Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 81–86. https://ajindex.com/articles/468561

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Mafflli N. Rupture of the Achilles tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999
  2. 81(7):1019-36 2. Carden DG, Noble J, Chalmers J, Lunn P, Ellis J. Rupture of the calcaneal tendon. The early and late management. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1987
  3. 69(3):416-20. 3. Inglis AE, Scot WN, Sculco TP. Ruptures of the tendoachillis. An objectie assessment of surgical and non-surgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg 1976
  4. 58(7):990-3. 4. Abraham E, Pankovich AM. Neglected rupture of the Achilles tendon. Treatment by V-Y tendinous flp. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1975
  5. 57(2):253-5. 5. Wapner KL, Pavlock GS, Hecht PJ, Naselli F, Walther R. Repair of chronic Achilles tendon rupture with flxor hallucis longus tendon transfer. Foot Ankle 1993
  6. 14(8):443-9. 6. Gabel S, Manoli A. Neglected rupture of the Achilles tendon. Foot Ankle Int 1994
  7. 15(9):512–7. 7. Mafflli N, Leadbettr WB. Free gracilis tendon graf in neglected tears of the achilles tendon. Clin J Sport Med 2005
  8. 15(2):56-61. 8. Esenyel CZ, Tekin C, Cakar M, Bayraktar K,Saygili S, Esenyel M, et al. Surgical treatment of the neglected achilles tendon rupture with Hyalonect. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2014
  9. 104(5):434-43. 9. McClelland D1, Mafflli N. Neglected rupture of the Achilles tendon: reconstructin with peroneus brevis tendon transfer. Surgeon 2004
  10. 2(4):209-13. 10. Rush JH. Operatie repair of neglected rupture of the tendo Achillis. Aust N Z J Surg 1980
  11. 50(4):420-2. 11. M. Takao, M. Ochi. Repair of neglected Achilles Tendon Rupture using Gastrocnemius Fascial Fleps. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2003
  12. 123(9):471-4. 12. El Shewy MT, El Barbary HM, Abdel-Ghani H. Repair of chronic rupture of the achilles tendon using 2 intratendinous flps from the proximal gastrocnemius-soleus complex. Am J Sports Med 2009
  13. 37(8):1570-7. 13. Teuffr AP. Travmati rupture of the Achilles tendon. Reconstructin by transplant and graf using the lateral peroneus brevis. OrthopClin North Am 1974
  14. 5(1):89-93. 14. Mann RA, Holmes GB Jr, Seale KS, Collins DN. Chronic rupture of the Achilles tendon: a new technique of repair.J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991
  15. 73(2):214-9. 15. Choksey A, Soonawalla D, Murray J. Repair of neglected achilles tendon ruptures with marlex mesh. Injury 1996
  16. 27(3):215-7. 16. Parsons JR1, Weiss AB, Schenk RS, Alexander H, Pavlisko F. Long-term follow-up of achilles tendon repair with an absorbable polymer carbon fier composite.Foot Ankle 1989
  17. 9(4):179-84. 17. Hadi M, Young J, Cooper L, Costa M, Mafflli N. Surgical management of chronic ruptures of the Achilles tendon rem