Journals / Bozok Tıp Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of PRK and FS-LASIK Procedures in Treatment of Myopia and Myopic Astimatim

MİYOPİ VE MİYOPİK ASTİGMATİZMA TEDAVİSİNDE UYGULANAN PRK VE FS-LASİK PROSEDÜRLERİNİN KIYASLANMASI

Pages
26–31
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

PRK may induce haze and regression in high diopters.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To compare the results of photorefractie keratectomy (PRK) and femtosecond-assisted laser in situkeratomileusis (FS-LASIK) procedures in treatment of myopia and myopic astimatim.Material and Methods: One hundred and fourteen eyes of 57 patints with myopia and/or myopic astimatimwho had undergone PRK procedure were compared retrospectiely with 114 eyes of 57 patints with myopiaand/or myopic astimatim who had undergone FS-LASIK procedure.Results: In respect to age and sex, there were no signifiant diffrences between PRK and FS-LASIK groups.Regarding preoperatie and postoperatie spherical, cylinderical and spherical equivalent values, uncorrecteddistance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), there were no signifiant diffrencesbetween two groups.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Hazedeveloped in two eyes in PRK group, but they recovered 6 months later and regression occured up to -1.00 Din three eyes in PRK group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:PRK may induce haze and regression in high diopters.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To compare the results of photorefractie keratectomy (PRK) and femtosecond-assisted laser in situkeratomileusis (FS-LASIK) procedures in treatment of myopia and myopic astimatim.Material and Methods: One hundred and fourteen eyes of 57 patints with myopia and/or myopic astimatimwho had undergone PRK procedure were compared retrospectiely with 114 eyes of 57 patints with myopiaand/or myopic astimatim who had undergone FS-LASIK procedure.Results: In respect to age and sex, there were no signifiant diffrences between PRK and FS-LASIK groups.Regarding preoperatie and postoperatie spherical, cylinderical and spherical equivalent values, uncorrecteddistance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), there were no signifiant diffrencesbetween two groups. Predictability, efficy and safety index values were high and similar in both groups. Hazedeveloped in two eyes in PRK group, but they recovered 6 months later and regression occured up to -1.00 Din three eyes in PRK group. However, these were not signifiant statitially.Conclusion: Both PRK and FS-LASIK are effient, safe and predictable procedures for correctin of myopia andmyopic astimatim. PRK may induce haze and regression in high diopters.

Özet

Amaç: Miyopi ve miyopik astimatima tedavisinde uygulanan fotorefrakti keratektomi (PRK) ile Femtosaniye Lazer in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) prosedürlerinin sonuçlarının kıyaslanması. Gereç ve Yöntem: Miyopi ve/veya miyopik astimat olan ve PRK prosedürü uygulanan 57 hastanın 114 gözü ile, FS-LASİK uygulanan 57 hastanın 114 gözü retrospekti olarak kıyaslandı. Bulgular: İki grup arasında yaş ve cinsiyet açısından anlamlı bir farklılık yoktu. Yine iki grup arasında preoperati ve postoperati sferik değer, slendrik değer ve sferik eşdeğer, düzeltimemiş görme keskinliği ve düzeltimiş görme keskinliği açısından anlamlı bir farklılık yoktu. Öngörülebilirlik, etkinlik ve güvenilirlik endeks değerleri her iki grupta yüksekt ve benzerlik göstermekteydi. PRK grubunda iki gözde haze gelişti ancak bu gözler 6 ay sonra düzeldi, ve üç gözde -1.00 D ye kadar regresyon gelişti Ancak bunlar istatitii olarak anlamlı değildi. Sonuç: Miyopi ve miyopik astimatima tedavisinde , hem PRK hem de FS-LASİK etkin, güvenilir ve öngörülebilir prosedürlerdir. Yüksek dioptrilerde PRK uygulanan gözlerde haze ve regresyon gelişebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇETİNKAYA, S. (2022). Comparison of PRK and FS-LASIK Procedures in Treatment of Myopia and Myopic Astimatim. Bozok Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 26–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/468546

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Hamill MB, Berdy GJ, Davidson RS, Majmudar PA, Randleman JB, Shamie N, et al. Refractie Surgery. In: American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2014-2015; Sectin 13:71-4
  2. Srinivasan R. Ablatin of polymers and biological tisue by ultraviolet lasers. Science. 1986; 234(4776):559-65
  3. Trokel SL, Srinivasan R, Braren B. Excimer laser surgery of the cornea. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983; 96(6):710-5
  4. Majmudar PA, Forstot SL, Dennis RF, Nirankari VS, Damiano RE, Brenart R, et al. Topical mitomycine-C for subepithelial firosis aftr refractie corneal surgery. Ophthalmology. 2000; 107(1):89-94
  5. Aristeidou A, Taniguchi EV, Tsatsos M, Muller R, McAlinden C, Pineda R, et al. The evolutin of corneal and refractie surgery with the femtosecond laser. Eye Vis (Lond). 2015; 2:12
  6. Kullman G, Pineda R. Alternatie applicatins of the femtosecond laser in ophthalmology. Semin Ophthalmol. 2010; 25(5-6):256-64
  7. Wu W,Wang Y. Corneal higher-order aberratins of the anterior surface, posterior surface and total cornea aftr SMILE, FS-LASIK and FLex surgeries. Eye Contact Lens. 2016; 42:358-65
  8. Zhang J, Zhou YH, Li R, Tian L. Visual performance aftr conventinal LASIK and wavefront-guided LASIK with iris registratin: results at 1 year. Int J Ophthalmol. 2013; 6:498-504
  9. Naderi M, Sabour S, Khodakarim S, Daneshgar F. Studying the factors related to refractie error regression aftr PRK surgery. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018; 18:198
  10. Manche E, Roe J. Recent advances in wavefront-guided LASIK. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018; 29(4):286-91
  11. Miraftb M, Hashemi H, Asgari S. Two-year results of femtosecond assisted LASIK versus PRK for diffrent severity of astimatim. J Curr Ophthalmol.2018; 30(1):48-53
  12. Slade SG, Durrie DS, Binder PS. A prospectie, contralateral eye study comparing thin-flp LASIK (sub-Bowman keratomileusis) with photorefractie keratectomy. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116(6):1075-82
  13. Ryan DS, Sia RK, Rabin J, Rivers BA, Stutzman RD, Pasternak JF, et al. Contrast sensitiity aftr wavefront-guided and wavefront-optiized PRK and LASIK for myopia and myopic astimatim. J Refract Surg. 2018; 34(9):590-6
  14. Lee MD, Manche EE. Quality of vision aftr wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractie keratectomy: contralateral eye evaluatin. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017; 43(1):54-9
  15. Randleman JB, White AJ Jr, Lynn MJ, Hu MH, Stultig RD. Incidence, outcomes and risk factorsfor retreatment aftr wavefrontoptiized ablatins with PRK and LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2009; 25(3