SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bozok Tıp Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

The Role of Computed Tomography for the Detection of Lymph Node in Colon Cancers

KOLON KANSERLERİNDE BİLGİSAYARLI TOMOGRAFİNİN LENF NODU TESPİTİNDEKİ ROLÜ

Ramazan SARI
Doğukan DURAK
Ahmet GÜRER
Mustafa Ömer YAZICIOĞLU
Pages
48–51
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, lymph node detection rate of tomography in the pN2 group was higher than pN1 group. (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Computed tomography is a common imaging method for the diagnosis and treatment of malignant diseases.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and methods: In our study; the documents of patients examined who had surgery for colon cancer in Ankara Atatürk Training and Research Hospital between April 2015 and April 2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, lymph node detection rate of tomography in the pN2 group was higher than pN1 group. (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Computed tomography is a common imaging method for the diagnosis and treatment of malignant diseases. The presence of metastatic lymph nodes are important criterion in determining the prognosis of colon cancer. In this study, we aim to compare tomographic findings and pathology reports in patients with colon cancer. Material and methods: In our study; the documents of patients examined who had surgery for colon cancer in Ankara Atatürk Training and Research Hospital between April 2015 and April 2016. Totally 72 patients included to study who underwent surgery in the general surgery clinic for colon cancer. Patient’s tomography and pathology reports were retrospectively analyzed. Lymph nodes on computed tomography (btN) were compared with pathological lymph node (pN) status. Pathologic lymph node detection rate of tomography was investigated. Results: btN+ was detected in 36 of 72 patients included in the study. A total of 44 patients were pathologically pN+. Of the 36 patients with btN+, 28 were observed pN+. In the btN-36 patients, 16 were detected pN+. Computed tomography in the detection of lymph nodes; Sensitivity: %64, Specificity: %71, Positive Predictive Value: %77, Negative Predictive Value: %55. In addition, lymph node detection rate of tomography in the pN2 group was higher than pN1 group. (p

Özet

Amaç: Bilgisayarlı Tomografi malign hastalıkların tanı ve tedavisinde yaygın olarak kullanılan görüntülemeyöntemidir. Kolon kanserinde metastatik lenf nodu varlığı prognozu belirlemede önemli kriterlerdendir. Bizbu çalışmada kolon kanseri saptanan hastalarda; tomografik bulgularla, patoloji raporlarını karşılaştırmayıamaçladık.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmamızda; Nisan 2015 ile Nisan 2016 tarihleri arasında kolon kanseri tanısı ileAnkara Atatürk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesinde opere edilen hastaların dosya bilgileri incelendi. Kolonkanseri nedeniyle genel cerrahi kliniğinde ameliyat edilen hastalardan, ameliyat öncesi tüm abdominal bilgi-sayarlı tomografi incelemesi yapılan toplam 72 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastaların tomografi ve patolojiraporları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Bilgisayarlı tomografide görüntülenen lenf nodları (btN) patolojiklenf nodu (pN) durumu ile karşılaştırıldı. Tomografinin patolojik lenf nodunu saptayabilme oranı araştırıldı.Bulgular: Çalışmaya alınan 72 hastanın 36’sında btN+ saptandı. Patolojik olarak ise toplam 44 hastada pN+olduğu görüldü. btN+ 36 hastanın 28’inde pN+ olduğu gözlendi. btN- 36 hastanın ise 16’sında pN+ olduğusaptandı. Bilgisayarlı tomografinin l enf nodu tespitindeki; Duyarlılığı: %64, Özgüllüğü: %71, Pozitif PrediktifDeğeri: %77, Negatif Prediktif Değeri: %55 olarak hesaplandı. Ayrıca pN2 grubunda bilgisayarlı tomografidelenf nodu saptanma oranının pN1 grubuna göre daha yüksek olduğu saptandı. (p

🔖

Cite This Article

SARI, R., DURAK, D., GÜRER, A., YAZICIOĞLU, M. Ö. (2022). The Role of Computed Tomography for the Detection of Lymph Node in Colon Cancers. Bozok Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 48–51. https://ajindex.com/articles/468530

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Gültekin M, Boztaş G, Sağlık Bakanlığı, Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Ku- rumu, Türkiye kanser istatistikleri, 2014.
  2. Niekel MC, Bipat S, Stoker J, Diagnosticimaging of colorectal liver metastases with Ct, MR imaging, FDG Pet, and/or FDG Pet/Ct: a meta-analysis of prospective studies including patients who have not previously under göne treatment. Radiology. 2010;257:674–84.
  3. Dighe S, Blake H, Koh MD, Swift I, Arnaout A, Temple L. Accuracy of multi detector computed tomography in identifying poor prog- nostic factors in colonic cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1407–15.
  4. Chamadol N, Ninpiethoon T, Bhudhisawasd V, Pairojkul C. The role of CT scan in preoperative staging of colorectal carcinoma. J MedAssocThai. 2005;88:1847–53.
  5. S. Dighe, S. Purkayastha, I. Swift, P.P. Tekkis, A. Darzi, R. A’Hern, et al. Diagnostic precision of CT in local staging of colon cancers: a meta-analysis, Clinical Radiology. 2010;65:708-19.
  6. Gunderson LL, Jessup JM, Sargent DJ, Greene FL, Stewart AK. Re- vised TN Categorization for colon cancer based on national survival outcomes data. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2010; 28:264–71.
  7. Elibol FD, Obuz F, Sökmen S, Terzi C, Canda AE, Sağol Ö, Sarıoğlu S. The role of multidetector CT in local staging and evaluation of retroperitoneal surgical margin involvement in colon cancer, Diagn Interv Radiol. 2016;22:5-12. Rollvén E, Abraham-Nordling M, Holm T, Blomqvist L. Assessment and diagnostic accuracy of lymph node status to predict stage III colon cancer using computed tomography, Cancer Imaging. 2017 Jan 19;17:3. O’Connell MJ, Colangelo LH, Beart RW, Petrelli NJ, Allegra CJ, Sharif S, et al. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin in the preoperative multi modality treatment of rectal cancer: surgical end points from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project trial R-04. J ClinOncol. 2014; 32: 1927-34
  8. Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, Thompson JN, Van de Velde CJ, Nicolson M, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355: 11-20.
  9. Chi Y, Zhang X, Li J, Sun Y. To be or not to be: Significance of lymph nodes on pretreatment CT in predicting survival of rectal cancer patients, European Journal of Radiology. 2011;777: 473-7. Leufkens AM, van den Bosch MA, van Leeuwen MS, Siersema PD. Diagnosticaccuracy of computed tomography for colon cancer staging: a systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterol- ogy. 2011;46:887-94.
  10. Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A et al. Guidelines 2000 for colon