Journals / Journal of International Environmental Application and Science / 2017 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2

Estimating Drought Index Using Standardized Precipitation Index from 1901 to 2015, Turkey

Pages
154–160
Publication Date
2017-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Trends in SPI values denote that the ratio of Turkey experiencing extreme and/or severe drought provisions has different considerably through these years.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Complete administration and decision making in the subject of water resources needs dependable forecast for drought region, duration and severity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The major objective of this study is to determine drought features which are significant for drought awareness and management using rainfall data for 115 years (1901-2015) by compute Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) values in different time scales (1, 3, 6 and 12 months), where the SPI is used for Drought Early Warning.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Trends in SPI values denote that the ratio of Turkey experiencing extreme and/or severe drought provisions has different considerably through these years.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) · Drought Index · Precipitation

Abstract

Complete administration and decision making in the subject of water resources needs dependable forecast for drought region, duration and severity. The major objective of this study is to determine drought features which are significant for drought awareness and management using rainfall data for 115 years (1901-2015) by compute Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) values in different time scales (1, 3, 6 and 12 months), where the SPI is used for Drought Early Warning. The drought index is founded on monthly precipitation, SPI calculated over the Turkey region 38.9637 °N and 35.2433° E, at time scales of 1, 3, 6 and 12 months for the period 1901–2015. Trends in SPI values denote that the ratio of Turkey experiencing extreme and/or severe drought provisions has different considerably through these years.

🔖

Cite This Article

AL-QAYSİ, N. H. H., DURSUN, S., ALMUSLEHİ, M. A. A. (2017). Estimating Drought Index Using Standardized Precipitation Index from 1901 to 2015, Turkey. Journal of International Environmental Application and Science, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2, 154–160. https://ajindex.com/articles/46795

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Alston M, Kent J, (2004) Social impacts of drought: a report to NSW Agriculture. Centre for Rural Social Research. New South Wales (Australia): Charles Sturt University. Angelidis P, Maris F, Kotsovinos N, Hrissanthou V, (2012) Computation of drought index SPI with alternative distribution functions. Water resources management, 26(9), 2453-2473.
  2. Bandyopadhyay N, Bhuiyan C, Saha A, (2016) Heat waves, temperature extremes and their impacts on monsoon rainfall and meteorological drought in Gujarat, India. Natural Hazards, 82(1), 367-388.
  3. Berhanu FA, JM, K.-O. (2013). Regional drought severity assessment at a basin scale in the Limpopo drainage system. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 2013.
  4. Bond NR, Lake P, Arthington, A. H. (2008). The impacts of drought on freshwater ecosystems: an Australian perspective. Hydrobiologia, 600(1), 3-16.
  5. Ceylan A. (2009).
  6. Drought management plan for Ankara, Turkey. WMO's Newsletter: MeteoWorld. DaMatta, F. M., & Ramalho, J. D. C. (2006). Impacts of drought and temperature stress on coffee physiology and production: a review. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology, 18(1), 55-81.
  7. Emre, D., Turkish Inflation blow to PM Erdogan’s Santa Evita Myth, 2014, http://www.economonitor.com/emredeliveli/2014/02/09/turkish-inflation-blow-to-pm-erdogans-santa-evita-myth/
  8. He B, Lü A, Wu J, Zhao L, Liu M, (2011) Drought hazard assessment and spatial characteristics analysis in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 21(2), 235-249. http://www.world-grain.com/articles/news_home/World_Grain_News/2016/02/Turkeys_ drought_condition_affe.aspx?ID=%7B23E27926-3BDD-4334-8049-862FD99A3033%7D. McKee TB, Doesken NJ, Kleist, J, (1993) The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales, Preprints, 8th Conference on Applied Climatology, Anaheim, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 179–184.
  9. Loukas A, Vasiliades L, (2004) Probabilistic analysis of drought spatiotemporal characteristics inThessaly region, Greece. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 4(5/6), 719-731.
  10. Sivakumar, M. V., Stefanski, R., Bazza, M., Zelaya, S., Wilhite, D., & Magalhaes, A. R. (2014). High level meeting on national drought policy: summary and major outcomes. Weather and climate Extremes, 3, 126-132.
  11. Tsakiris G, Loukas A, Pangalou D, Vangelis H, Tigkas D, Rossi G, Cancelliere A, (2007) Drought characterization. Drought management guidelines technical annex, 85-102. Türkeş M, (2010). Klimatoloji ve meteoroloji: Kriter Yayınevi.
  12. Wilhite, D. A. (2000). Drought as a natural h