SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of International Environmental Application and Science / 2017 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3

Drawing Tools Used from Past to Present in the Architectural Design Process

Simge Bardak DENEREL
Tanay BİRİŞÇİ
Pages
230–237
Publication Date
2017-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Especially, under favour of rapid developments in information technology in the last 20 years, design process has become shorter, achieving a solution has become easier and there were presentations which have been produced in higher visual quality.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Drawing tools used in the design process are continually changing as a result of developments in technology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These new capabilities are of a nature significantly affecting the design process.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Especially, under favour of rapid developments in information technology in the last 20 years, design process has become shorter, achieving a solution has become easier and there were presentations which have been produced in higher visual quality.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Design · design process · drawing tools

Abstract

Drawing tools used in the design process are continually changing as a result of developments in technology. Computer aided drawing tools offer new capabilities to users as an alternative to traditional drawing tools that have been used to this day. These new capabilities are of a nature significantly affecting the design process. This study examines the effective use of traditional and computer aided drawing tools in the landscape design process. In this respect the scope of the study includes design, design processes and drawing tools. Especially, under favour of rapid developments in information technology in the last 20 years, design process has become shorter, achieving a solution has become easier and there were presentations which have been produced in higher visual quality.

🔖

Cite This Article

DENEREL, S. B., BİRİŞÇİ, T. (2017). Drawing Tools Used from Past to Present in the Architectural Design Process. Journal of International Environmental Application and Science, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3, 230–237. https://ajindex.com/articles/46783

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Akın Ö, Anadol Z, (1993) What’s wrong with CAAD? Carnegie Mellon Pittsburgh, pp:11. Ayaydın A, (2010) Temel Tasarım Eğitiminde Bilgisayar Teknolojisinin Gerekliliği ve Geleceği, Dicle Üniv. Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15, 52-62. Aydın ED, (2004)
  2. Temel Tasarıma Çağdaş Yaklaşımlar, Yazarın Kendi Yayını, İstanbul, pp: 313. Bermudez J, (1998) Media interaction design process: Establishing a knowledgebase, digital design studios: Do computers make a difference? pp. 6-26,
  3. Eds. Seebohm, T. and Skip, V. W., ACADIA'98: Assocciation for Computer-Aided Design in Architecture. Quebec, Canada. Beyazıt N, (1994) Endüstri Ürünlerinde ve Mimarlıkta Tasarlama Metotlarına Giriş, Literatür Yayıncılık, İstanbul, Türkiye, pp:288. Bielefeld B, Khouli SE, (2010) Adım Adım Tasarım Fikirleri, (traslateed by V. Atmaca), Yapı Endüstri Merkezi YEM Yayınları, İstanbul, pp:84. Catia, 2011, http://www.3dcatia.com/ (Retrieved: 17 December 2011).
  4. Cooper R, Press M, (1995) The Design Agenda: A Guide To Successful Design management, Baffins Lane, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 293p. Cross N, (2007)
  5. Designerly Ways Of Knowing, Board Of International Research In Designi Bird, Germany, 139p. Dağlı UU, Şahin NP, (2012) Tasarım Eğitiminde İnterdisipliner Yaklaşımın Değerlendirilmesi: DAÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi, Mimari Tasarıma Giriş Stüdyosu. Mimarlık, 367 http://www.mimarlikdergisi.com/index.cfm?sayfa=mimarlik&DergiSayi =381&RecID=2995 (Retrieved: 13 June 2016).
  6. Demiroğlu D, Görmüş S, Birişçi T, Erdoğan R, Kalaycı A, Karadağ AA, Sezen I, (2014) Öğrenci Odaklı Peyzaj Mimarlığı Öğreniminde Stajın Yeri ve Önemi, I. Peyzaj Mimarlığı Eğitim-Öğretim Çalıştayı, Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Antalya, pp: 251-265.
  7. Erdoğan R, Sezen I, Birişçi T, Demiroğlu D, Görmüş S, Kalaycı A, Karadağ AA, (2014) Türkiye’de Peyzaj Mimarlığı Öğreniminde Staj Uygulamaları, I. Peyzaj Mimarlığı Eğitim-Öğretim Çalıştayı, Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Antalya, pp. 227-237. Erdoğdu GPS, (2016) Temel Tasarım Eğitimi: Bir Ders Planı Örneği, Planlama 2016; 26(1): 7-19 Frederick M, (2007) Mimarlık Okulunda Öğrendiğim 101 Şey, (traslateed by V. Atmaca), Yapı Endüstri Merkezi YEM yayınları, İstanbul, 101p. Gökmen H, Süer D, (2003) Mimarlık Eğitiminde Tasarım Stüdyolarına Farklı Yaklaşımlar, Mimarlar Odası İzmir Şubesi Yayınları, İzmir, 160p. Gülgün B, Güney MA, Aktaş E, Yazici K, (2014) Role of Landscape Architect in Interdisciplinary Planing of Sustainable Cities. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology 15 No: 4, 1877–1880 (