Journals / Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Small Mammal Remains in Pallid Scops Owl Otus brucei (Hume 1872) Pellets

Çizgili İshakkuşu Otus brucei (Hume 1872) Peletlerindeki Küçük Memeli Hayvan Kalıntıları

Pages
105–112
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The House Mouse Mus sp., and Cricetulus migratorius, were the most abundant prey items, representing 29.03% of the total number of recovered prey items.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Pellets, regurgitated by the Pallid Scops Owl (Otus brucei), were collected from Şanlıurfa-Birecik in southeastern Anatolia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In 26 pellets analyses yielded remains of 31 individuals, representing two mammalian order (Soricomorpha: Crocidura suaveolens, and Rodentia: Microtus guentheri, Mus sp., Meriones tristrami, Cricetulus migratorius).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The House Mouse Mus sp., and Cricetulus migratorius, were the most abundant prey items, representing 29.03% of the total number of recovered prey items.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Pellets, regurgitated by the Pallid Scops Owl (Otus brucei), were collected from Şanlıurfa-Birecik in southeastern Anatolia. In 26 pellets analyses yielded remains of 31 individuals, representing two mammalian order (Soricomorpha: Crocidura suaveolens, and Rodentia: Microtus guentheri, Mus sp., Meriones tristrami, Cricetulus migratorius). The number of prey items per one pellet ranged from 1-3 individuals (Average 1.85 skull). Rodens constituted 87,1% of its diet, while Soricomorpha constituted 12.9%. The House Mouse Mus sp., and Cricetulus migratorius, were the most abundant prey items, representing 29.03% of the total number of recovered prey items.

Özet

Güneydoğu Anadolu, Şanlıurfa Birecik’ten toplanmış, Çizgili İshakkuşu (Otus brucei)’na ait 26 pelet içerisinde31 memeli hayvan kalıntısı incelenmiştir. İki memeli ordosuna ait beş türe (Soricomorpha: Crocidura suaveolens,ve Rodentia: Microtus guentheri, Mus sp., Meriones tristrami, Cricetulus migratorius) ait kalıntılar tespitedilmiştir. Her pelette ortalama 1,85 memeli hayvan kalıntısı bulunmuştur. Pellet içinde tespit edilen memelikalıntılarını % 87,1 oranında kemirgenler oluştururken %12,9’unu böcekçil memeli kalıntıları meydanagetirmektedir. Ev faresi Mus sp, ve Cricetulus migratorius’un, kalıntılar içerisinde aynı oranda %29,03 ile en bolbulunan türler oldukları tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, A., KOÇKAYA, M., COŞKUN, Y., MUSAOĞLU, I. C., SEÇKİN, S. (2022). Small Mammal Remains in Pallid Scops Owl Otus brucei (Hume 1872) Pellets. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 105–112. https://ajindex.com/articles/467166

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Heinzel H., Fitter R., Parslow J. 1995. Türkiye ve Avrupa’nın Kuşları. Türkiye Doğal Hayatı Koruma Derneği, 384s, İstanbul. BirdLife International. 2016. Otus brucei. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T22688631A93203300. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T22688631 A93203300.en. (Erişim tarihi: 05.02. 2018). Avibase- the world bird database. https://avibase.bsc-eoc.org/avibase.jsp. (Erişim tarihi:09. 02. 2018) Bate D. M. A. 1945. Note on small mammals from the Lebanon Mountains, Syria. -Annals and Magazine of Natural History Serie, 11., xii: 141-158.
  2. Obuch J., Benda P. 1996. Contribution to the feeding ecology of Strix aluco and Bubo bubo (Aves: Strigiformes) in southwestern Bulgaria. Acta Societas Zoologicae Bohemicae, 60: 43 - 49. Amr Z. S., Al-Melhim W. N., Yousef A. 1997. Mammals remains from pellets of the Eagle owl, from Azraq Nature Reserve. Jordan. Zoology in the Middle East, 14: 5-10. Obuch J.,Kristin A. 2004. Prey composition of the little owl Athena noctua in an arid zone (Egypt, Syria, Iran), Folia Zoologica, 53 (1): 65-79. Kasparek M. 1985. Die Sultanssümpfe. Naturgeschichte eines Vogelparadieses in Anatolien. Heidelberg, 156s. Kasparek M. 1988. Bafasee: Natur und Geschichte in der türkischgen Ägäis. Heidelberg, 176s. Kock D. 1990. Notes on mammals (Insectivora, Rodentia) taken by the Tawny Owl in NW Turkey. Zoology in the Middle East, 4: 5-9.
  3. Nadachowski A., Smielowski, J., Rzebikkowalska, B., Daoud A. 1990. Mammals from the Near East in Polish collection. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia, 33(6): 91-120.
  4. Steiner H. M., Vauk G. 1966. Säugetiere aus dem Beyşehir-Gebiet (Konya, Kleinasien). Zoologische Anzeiger, 176: 97-102.
  5. Seçkin S., Coşkun Y. 2005. Small mammals in the diet of the Long-eared Owl from Diyarbakır, Turkey. Zoology in the Middle East, 35: 102-103.
  6. Seçkin S., Coşkun Y. 2006. Mammalian remains in the pellets of the Long-eared Owls in Diyarbakır province. Turkish Journal of Zoology 30: 271-278.
  7. Turan, L., 2005. Winter Diet of a Long-Eared Owl Population in Ankara, Beytepe. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry, Volume 34: 69-76.
  8. Bulut Ş., Akbaba B., Ayaş Z. 2012. Analysis of mammal remains from owl pellets (Asio otus), in a suburban area in Beytepe, Ankara. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry,40, 233–237. Hızal E. 2013.
  9. Diet of the Long-eared Owl, Asio otus, in Central Anatolia (Aves: Strigidae). Zoology in the Middle East, 59: 118-122. Göçer E. 2016. Diet of a nesting pair of Long-eared Owls, Asio ot