Journals / Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

The Estimation of Carrying Capacity for Lake Nazik with the Remote Sensing Method

Uzaktan Algılama Metodu İle Nazik Gölü İçin Taşıma Kapasitesinin Tahmini

Pages
835–842
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, it was found out that theannual average value for water surface temperature during the study was 14.9 C0 .

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Lake Nazik is located in 1816 m above sea level and in 380 51’ N 420 14’ E coordinates.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Carrying capacity of lake was identified as 24100.21 tons/year, and an annual average chlorophyll-a value was found out as 7.12 mg/m3 .
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, it was found out that theannual average value for water surface temperature during the study was 14.9 C0 .
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Lake Nazik is located in 1816 m above sea level and in 380 51’ N 420 14’ E coordinates. In this study, to identify the value of monthly chlorophyll-a, ENVISAT/MERIS satellite images were used. On the other hand, MODIS/Aqua satellite images were also used to identify the value of monthly surface water temperature. Carrying capacity of lake was identified as 24100.21 tons/year, and an annual average chlorophyll-a value was found out as 7.12 mg/m3 . Using data on ENVISAT/MERIS satellite images, it has been observed that the chlorophyll-a concentration in Lake Nazik reached its highest value of 30.071 mg/m3 in September, while dropping to its lowest value of 3.727 mg/m3 in January. Using data on MODIS/Aqua satellite images, it has been observed that the maximum value of water surface temperaturewas 22.89 C0 in August, while the minimum value was 2.33 C0 in December. Furthermore, it was found out that theannual average value for water surface temperature during the study was 14.9 C0 .

Özet

Nazik Gölü deniz seviyesinden 1856 metre yukarıda, 380 51’ N 420 14’ E koordinatları içerisinde yer almaktadır.Bu çalışmada, aylık klorofil-a değerlerinin belirlenmesinde ENVISAT/MERIS uydu görüntüleri kullanılmıştır.Aylık yüzey suyu sıcaklık değerlerinin belirlenmesinde MODIS/Aqua uydu görüntüleri kullanılmıştır. Gölüntaşıma kapasitesi 24100.21 ton/yıl, yıllık ortalama klorofil-a değeri 7.12 mg/m3 olarak bulunmuştur.ENVISAT/MERIS uydu görüntülerinden elde edilen klorofil-a konsantrasyonu, en yüksek 30.071 mg/m3ile Eylülayı içerisinde, en düşük 3.727 mg/m3ile Ocak ayı içerisinde gözlemlenmiştir. MODIS/Aqua uydu görüntülerdenelde edilen yüzey suyu sıcaklık değerleri, en yüksek 22.89 C0 Ağustos ayında, en düşük 2.33 C0 Aralık ayındagözlemlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKKUŞ, M., SARI, M. (2022). The Estimation of Carrying Capacity for Lake Nazik with the Remote Sensing Method. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 835–842. https://ajindex.com/articles/467107

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Odum E.P., Barrett G.W. 2008. Ekolojinin Temel İlkeleri. Palme Yayınevi, 534s. İstanbul
  2. Pulatsü S. 2003. The application of a phosphorus budget model estimating the carrying capacity of Kesikköprü Dam Lake. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 27 (5): 1127-1130
  3. Buhan E., Koçer M.A., Polat F., Doğan H.M., Dirim S., Neary E.T. 2010. Almus Baraj Gölü Su Kalitesinin Alabalık Yetiştiriciliği Açısından Değerlendirilmesi ve Tasıma Kapasitesinin Tahmini. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 27 (1): 57-65
  4. İskenderoğlu D., Yeşilayer N., Doğan H.M., Mete H., Kaymak N., Buhan E. 2017. The Estimatıon of the Carrying Capacity of Atakoy Dam Lake For The Intensıve Rainbow Trout Culture in Cage, Ecology Symposim, pp: 6-7, 11-13 May, Kayseri
  5. Toda S., Matsuda O., Kadowaki S., Yokoyama J., Yamasaki M. 2004. Ecosystem andn Carrying capacites of Aquaculture ground- for sustainable development of aquaculture and stock enhancement. Seikai National Fisheries Resereach Institute, 19: 1-7
  6. Şen F., Çetinkaya O., Elp M. 1999. Nazik Gölü (Ahlat-Bitlis) Siraz (Capoeta capoeta, G., 1773) Populasyonu Üzerinde Bir Araştırma, X. Ulusal Su Ürünleri Sempozyumu, 22-24 Eylül, Temel Bilimler ve Biyolojik Çeşitlilik Seksiyonları, pp: 465-475, Adana
  7. Lara G., Encina L., Rodriguez R. 2009. Trophometric index: a predictor for fish density, biomass and production in Mediterranean reservoir in Spain. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 16: 341– 351
  8. Ryder R.A. 1965. A method for estimating the potential fish production of north-temperate lakes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 94: 214–218
  9. Dillon P.J., Rigler F.H. 1975. A Simple Method for Predicting the Capacity of a Lake Based on a Lake Trophic Status. J.Fish.Res.Board Can, 32: 1519-1531
  10. Young W.D., Heimbuch D.G. 1982. Another consideration of the morphoedaphic index. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 111: 151–153
  11. Hanson L.M., Legget W.C. 1982. Empirical prediction of fish biomass and yield. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 39: 257–263
  12. Khalil M.T. 1998. Prediction of fish yield and potential produtivity from limnological data in Lake Borollus, International Journal of Salt Lake Research, 6: 323-326
  13. Akkus M., Sarı M, 2013. A Research on Estimating of Carrying Capcity of Lake Erçek with the Remote Sensing Method. Proc. ‘ESA Living Planet Symposium 2013, Edinburgh, UK 9–13 September 14. Brown O.B., Minnett P.J., 1999. MODIS Infrared sea surface temperatu