Journals / Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

Investigation of Some Microbiological and Chemical Properties of Different Cheeses

Farklı Peynir Çeşitlerinin Bazı Mikrobiyolojik ve Kimyasal Özelliklerinin Araştırılması

Pages
1389–1400
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Of the white cheese samples, 8% contained L. monocytogenes, while 48% in terms of salt content and28% in terms of moisture content did not meet Turkish standards It was determined that some of the cheese samplesexamined in accordance with the obtained results may pose a risk in microbiological terms and do not comply withthe relevant standards in terms of chemistry.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, some microbiological and chemical analyses were performed on samples of kashar, chechil, lor andwhite cheeses produced in the region of Kars.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Of the examined kashar cheese samples, 28% in terms of salt content and 40% in terms ofmoisture content did not meet Turkish standards.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Of the white cheese samples, 8% contained L. monocytogenes, while 48% in terms of salt content and28% in terms of moisture content did not meet Turkish standards It was determined that some of the cheese samplesexamined in accordance with the obtained results may pose a risk in microbiological terms and do not comply withthe relevant standards in terms of chemistry.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, some microbiological and chemical analyses were performed on samples of kashar, chechil, lor andwhite cheeses produced in the region of Kars. The samples were microbiologically evaluated in means of totalaerob mesophilic bacteria, coliform group bacteria, Escherichia coli, Enterobacteriaceae, StaphylococciMicrococci, yeast-mold, Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes. The pH values of cheese samples weredetermined by pH-meter, acidity and salt content by titration method, fat content by Gerber method and moisturecontent by gravimetric method. The chemical analyses were completed and investigated for compliance withTurkish standards. Of the examined kashar cheese samples, 28% in terms of salt content and 40% in terms ofmoisture content did not meet Turkish standards. Of the chechil cheese samples, 60% in terms of salt content and40% in terms of moisture content did not meet Turkish standards. Of the lor cheese samples, 4% contained L.monocytogenes, while 20% in terms of salt content and 28% in terms of moisture content did not meet Turkishstandards. Of the white cheese samples, 8% contained L. monocytogenes, while 48% in terms of salt content and28% in terms of moisture content did not meet Turkish standards It was determined that some of the cheese samplesexamined in accordance with the obtained results may pose a risk in microbiological terms and do not comply withthe relevant standards in terms of chemistry.

Özet

Bu araştırmada Kars yöresinde üretimi yapılan kaşar, çeçil, lor ve beyaz peynir örneklerinin mikrobiyolojik ve kimyasal özellikleri incelendi. Örnekler mikrobiyolojik olarak toplam aerob mezofilik bakteri, koliform grubu bakteri, E. coli, Enterobacteriaceae, Stafilokok-Mikrokok, maya-küf, Salmonella spp. ve L. monocytogenes yönünden değerlendirildi. Peynir örneklerinin pH değerleri pH-metreyle, asitlik ve tuz miktarları titrasyon yöntemiyle, yağ miktarı Gerber metoduyla ve rutubet miktarı gravimetrik yöntemle tespit edilerek örneklerin kimyasal özellikler açısından standartlara uygun olup olmadıkları belirlendi. Sonuç olarak incelenen kaşar peyniri örneklerinden %28’inin tuz ve %40’ının rutubet; çeçil peyniri örneklerinden %60’ının tuz ve %40’ının rutubet; lor örneklerinden %4’ünün L. monocytogenes, %20’sinin tuz ve %28’inin rutubet; beyaz peynir örneklerinden %8’inin L. monocytogenes, %48’inin tuz ve %28’inin rutubet yönünden Türk Standartlarında belirtilen kriterlere uygun olmadığı belirlendi. Elde edilen sonuçlar doğrultusunda incelenen peynir örneklerinin bazılarının mikrobiyolojik açıdan risk oluşturabileceği ve kimyasal yönden de ilgili standartlara uymadığı belirlendi.

🔖

Cite This Article

HARMANKAYA, S., HARMANKAYA, A. (2022). Investigation of Some Microbiological and Chemical Properties of Different Cheeses. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 1389–1400. https://ajindex.com/articles/466942

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Kamber U. 2005. Geleneksel Anadolu Peynirleri. Miki Matbaacılık San. ve Ltd. Şti, Ankara
  2. Varga L. 2007. Microbiological quality of commercial dairy products. Pages 487-494 in Communicating Current Research and Educational Topics and Trends in Applied Microbiology. Formatex Microbiology Series; (1). A. Mendez-Vilas, ed. Formatex, Badajoz, Spain
  3. Kılıç S. 2010. Süt Mikrobiyolojisi. Sidaş Medya Ltd. Şti, İzmir
  4. Kongo J.M., Malkata F.X. 2016. Cheese: Chemistry and Microbiology. Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, 735-740
  5. Kaynar P. 2011. Ülkemiz peynirleri üzerine mikrobiyolojik araştırmalar. Türk Mikrobiyol Cem Derg, 41 (1): 1-8
  6. Bostan K. 1994. Değişik ambalajlar içinde bulunan tulum peynirlerinin duyusal, kimyasal ve mikrobiyolojik özellikleri. In: Demirci M. (Editör), Her Yönüyle Peynir Kitabı, Trakya Üniv Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, Tekirdağ, 244-248
  7. Ekici K., Okut H., Isleyici O., Sancak Y.C., Tuncay R.B. 2019. The determination of some microbiological and chemical features in herby cheese. Foods, 8 (23): 1-11
  8. Oktay İ., Heperken D., Kaya G.D. 2006. Peynir, tereyağı ve kumpirde patojen mikroorganizmalar ve hızlı test yöntemi vidas ile Listeria ve Salmonella aranması. Dokuzuncu Gıda Kongresi Kitabı, Bolu, Türkiye,643
  9. Morul F., İşleyici Ö. 2012. Divle tulum peynirinin kimyasal ve mikrobiyolojik özellikleri. YYÜ Vet Fak Derg, 23 (2): 71-76
  10. Başkaya R., Atasever M., Çakmak Ö., Yıldız A. 2006. Civil peynirlerin mikrobiyolojik nitelikleri. İÜ Vet Fak Derg, 32: 1-13
  11. Koçulu İ., Kayacan G., Tatari F., Torun O., Ünsal D. 2014. Alplerden Kafkaslara Kars Peynirciliğinin 150 Yıllık Tarihi. Boğatepe Çevre ve Yaşam Derneği, Tarih Vakfı, Ofset Matbaacılık, İstanbul
  12. Messer J.W., Behney H.M., Leudecke L.O. 1985. Mikrobiological Count Methods. In: Richardson G.H. (Editor). Standart Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products, 15. Edition, 133-149
  13. Anonymous, 1995. The Oxoid Manual. Compiled By EY Bridson, 7th. Ed. Oxoid Ltd. Basingstoke, Hampshire
  14. Koburger J.A., Marth E.H. 1984. Yeasts and Molds. In: Speck M.L. (Editor), Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Food, 197-201
  15. Anonymous, 2001. Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding Stuffs-Horizontal Method for the Enumeration of ß-Glucuronidase-Positive Escherichia coli. Part 2: Colony-Count Technique A 44°C Using 5-Bromo-4-Chloro-3-Indoyl-Beta-D-Glucuronide, ISO 16649-2
  16. Pichhardt K. 1993. Lebensmittel mikrobiologie.