Journals / Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4

Performance Comparison of Generative Adversarial Networks in Mustache Pattern Production

Bıyık Deseni Üretiminde Çekişmeli Üretici Ağların Performans Karşılaştırması

Pages
1575–1589
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the studies, it is seen that the production speed of the mustache pattern image drops below one second, while the production accuracy reaches 86%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, performance analysis of generative adversarial network architectures that transform from image to image is made and its performance in synthetic image generation is evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For a quality performance evaluation of these models, the denim2bıyık dataset collected from the real-world area was used instead of standardized datasets.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the studies, it is seen that the production speed of the mustache pattern image drops below one second, while the production accuracy reaches 86%.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, performance analysis of generative adversarial network architectures that transform from image to image is made and its performance in synthetic image generation is evaluated. For a quality performance evaluation of these models, the denim2bıyık dataset collected from the real-world area was used instead of standardized datasets. Mustache patterns drawn on denim fabrics are created with a laser device. For this device to create the desired mustache pattern, it is necessary to work with visual editing programs for approximately 2-3 hours by specialized personnel. With the proposed approach, an automatic mustache production process will be realized, errors and time losses in manual production will be eliminated. As a result of our literature research, there is a no different study on the production of denim product images with productive networks. This situation increases the academic original value of the study. GAN architectures used in the study are Pix2Pix, CycleGAN, DiscoGAN, and AttentionGAN. Mustache pattern production performance evaluation and cost analysis were performed on the training and test data in the denim2bıyık dataset of each architecture. As a result of the studies, it is seen that the production speed of the mustache pattern image drops below one second, while the production accuracy reaches 86%.

Özet

Bu çalışmada görüntüden görüntüye dönüşüm yapan çekişmeli üretici ağ mimarilerinin performans incelemesi yapılıp, sentetik görüntü üretimindeki başarımı değerlendirilmiştir. Bu modellerin kaliteli bir başarım değerlendirmesi için standartlaştırılmış veri kümeleri yerine gerçek iş alanından toplanılan denim2bıyık veri kümesi kullanılmıştır. Denim kumaşları üzerine çizilen bıyık desenleri lazer cihazıyla oluşturulmaktadır. Bu cihazın istenilen bıyık desenini oluşturabilmesi için uzmanlaşmış bir personel tarafından görsel düzenleme programları ile yaklaşık 2-3 saat süren bir çalışma yapması gerekir. Önerilen yaklaşımla otomatik bir bıyık üretim işlemi gerçekleşecek, manuel üretimdeki hatalar ve zamansal kayıplar elimine edilecektir. Yaptığımız literatür araştırması neticesinde denim ürün görsellerinin üretken ağlar ile üretilmesi ile ilgili farklı bir çalışma bulunmamaktadır. Bu durum yapılan çalışmanın akademik özgün değerini yükseltmektedir. Çalışmada kullanılan ÇÜA mimarileri Pix2Pix, CycleGAN, DiscoGAN ve AttentionGAN’dır. Her bir mimarinin denim2bıyık veri kümesindeki eğitim ve test verileri üzerinde bıyık deseni üretim başarım değerlendirmesi ve maliyet analizi yapılmıştır. Yapılan çalışmalar sonucunda, bıyık desen görseli üretim hızı bir saniyenin altına düşerken, üretim doğruluğu %86 seviyelerine çıktığı görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, E., TALU, M. F. (2022). Performance Comparison of Generative Adversarial Networks in Mustache Pattern Production. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4, 1575–1589. https://ajindex.com/articles/466636

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Das S., Dey A., Pal A., Roy N. 2015. Applications of artificial ıntelligence in machine learning: review and prospect. International Journal of Computer Applications, 115 (9), 31–41
  2. LeCun Yann, et al. 1989. Backpropagation applied to handwritten zip code recognition. Neural Computation
  3. Goodfellow I J., Pouget-Abadie J., Mirza M., Xu B., Warde-Farley D., Ozair S., Courville A., Bengio Y. 2014. Generative adversarial nets. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2672–2680
  4. Radford A., Metz L., Chintala S. 2016. Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks. 4th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2016- Conference Track Proceedings, 1–16
  5. Isola P., Zhu J Y., Zhou T., Efros A A. 2017. Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networks. Proceedings- 30th IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2017, 5967–5976
  6. Zhu J Y., Park T., Isola P., Efros A A. 2017. Unpaired Image-to-Image Translation Using CycleConsistent Adversarial Networks. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2242–2251
  7. Karras T., Aila T., Laine S., Lehtinen J. 2018. Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variation. 6th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2018- Conference Track Proceedings, 1–25
  8. Huang X., Belongie S. 2017. Arbitrary Style Transfer in Real-Time with Adaptive Instance Normalization. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 1510– 1519
  9. Karras T., Laine S., Aila T. 2019. A Style-based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 4396–4405
  10. Wang T C., Liu M Y., Zhu J Y., Tao A., Kautz J., Catanzaro B. 2018. High-Resolution Image Synthesis and Semantic Manipulation with Conditional GANs. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 8798–8807
  11. Park T., Liu M Y., Wang T C., Zhu J Y. 2019. Semantic Image Synthesis with Spatially-adaptive Normalization. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2332–2341
  12. Dundar A., Sapra K., Liu G., Tao A., Catanzaro B. 2020. Panoptic-based Image Synthesis. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 8067–8076