Journals / Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

A Comparison of Ensemble and Base Learner Algorithms for the Prediction of Machining Induced Residual Stresses in the Turning of Aerospace Materials

Pages
861–879
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that the AdaBoost algorithm was able to predict the machining induced residual stresses with a mean absolute error of 18.1 MPa for the IN718 alloy and 31.3 MPa for Ti6Al4V by taking into account all the variables, while the artificial neural network provides the lowest mean absolute errors for the Ti6Al4V alloy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The estimation of residual stresses is essential to prevent the catastrophic failures of the components used in the aerospace industry.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The objective of this work is to predict the machining induced residual stresses with bagging, boosting, and single-based machine learning models based on the design and cutting parameters used in the turning of Inconel 718 and Ti6Al4V alloys.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that the AdaBoost algorithm was able to predict the machining induced residual stresses with a mean absolute error of 18.1 MPa for the IN718 alloy and 31.3 MPa for Ti6Al4V by taking into account all the variables, while the artificial neural network provides the lowest mean absolute errors for the Ti6Al4V alloy.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The estimation of residual stresses is essential to prevent the catastrophic failures of the components used in the aerospace industry. The objective of this work is to predict the machining induced residual stresses with bagging, boosting, and single-based machine learning models based on the design and cutting parameters used in the turning of Inconel 718 and Ti6Al4V alloys. Experimentally measured residual stress data of these two materials was compiled from the literature, including the surface material of the cutting tools, cooling conditions, rake angles, as well as the cutting speed, feed, and width of cut to show the robustness of the models. These variables were also grouped into different combinations to clearly show the contribution and necessity of each element. Various predictive models in machine learning (AdaBoost, Random Forest, Artificial Neural Network, K-Neighbors Regressor, Linear Regressor) were then applied to estimate the residual stresses on the machined surfaces for the classified groups using the generated data. It was found that the AdaBoost algorithm was able to predict the machining induced residual stresses with a mean absolute error of 18.1 MPa for the IN718 alloy and 31.3 MPa for Ti6Al4V by taking into account all the variables, while the artificial neural network provides the lowest mean absolute errors for the Ti6Al4V alloy. On the other hand, the linear regression model gives poor agreement with the experimental data. All the analyses showed that AdaBoost (boosting) ensemble learning and artificial neural network models can be used for the prediction of the machining induced residual stresses with the small datasets of the IN718 and Ti6Al4V materials.

🔖

Cite This Article

BUYRUKOĞLU, S., KESRİKLIOĞLU, S. (2022). A Comparison of Ensemble and Base Learner Algorithms for the Prediction of Machining Induced Residual Stresses in the Turning of Aerospace Materials. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 861–879. https://ajindex.com/articles/466570

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. D. Ulutan and T. Ozel, "Machining induced surface integrity in titanium and nickel alloys: Areview", International Journal of Machine Tools and MAnufacture. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.11.003
  2. J. Holmberg, J. M. Rodríguez Prieto, J. Berglund, A. Sveboda, and P. Jonsén, “Experimental and PFEM-simulations of residual stresses from turning tests of a cylindrical Ti-6Al-4V shaft,” 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2018.05.087
  3. Y. Hua and Z. Liu, “Experimental investigation of principal residual stress and fatigue performance for turned nickel-based superalloy Inconel 718,” Materials (Basel)., 2018, doi: 10.3390/ma11060879
  4. F. Jafarian, H. Amirabadi, and J. Sadri, “Experimental measurement and optimization of tensile residual stress in turning process of Inconel718 superalloy,” Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed., 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.11.021
  5. G. Kartheek, K. Srinivas, and C. Devaraj, “Optimization of Residual Stresses in Hard Turning of Super Alloy Inconel 718,” 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.12.029
  6. K. Satyanarayana, A. V. Gopal, and N. Ravi, “Studies on surface integrity and its optimisation in turning Ti-6Al-4V,” Int. J. Precis. Technol., 2015, doi: 10.1504/ijptech.2015.073837
  7. D. M. Madyira, R. F. Laubscher, N. Janse Van Rensburg, and P. F. J. Henning, “High speed machining induced residual stresses in Grade 5 titanium alloy,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L J. Mater. Des. Appl., 2013, doi: 10.1177/1464420712462319
  8. Y. Ayed, G. Germain, A. P. Melsio, P. Kowalewski, and D. Locufier, “Impact of supply conditions of liquid nitrogen on tool wear and surface integrity when machining the Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2017, doi: 10.1007/s00170-017-0604-7
  9. A. Devillez, G. Le Coz, S. Dominiak, and D. Dudzinski, “Dry machining of Inconel 718, workpiece surface integrity,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.04.011
  10. G. Le Coz, R. Piquard, A. D’Acunto, D. Bouscaud, M. Fischer, and P. Laheurte, “Precision turning analysis of Ti-6Al-4V skin produced by selective laser melting using a design of experiment approach,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00170-020-05807-8
  11. T. Özel and D. Ulutan, “Prediction of machining induced residual stresses in turning of titanium and nickel based alloys with experiments and finite element simulations,” CIRP Ann. - Manuf. Technol., 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2012.03.100
  12. A. Paranjpe and A, “RESIDUAL STRESSE