Journals / Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Development of Machine Learning Based Control System for Vehicle Active Suspension System

Pages
421–428
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results demonstrated that the proposed machine learning (ML) based ground-penetrating radar (GPR) controller outperforms the optimal controller under uncertainties in terms of reducing the oscillation in sprung mass position with a 15% and 21.64% reduction for square and random road conditions, respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, Gaussian process (GP) algorithm, which is one of the machine learning methods, is designed to control the vehicle active suspension system (VASS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Experimental data were trained by supervised learning method (regression method).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results demonstrated that the proposed machine learning (ML) based ground-penetrating radar (GPR) controller outperforms the optimal controller under uncertainties in terms of reducing the oscillation in sprung mass position with a 15% and 21.64% reduction for square and random road conditions, respectively.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this paper, Gaussian process (GP) algorithm, which is one of the machine learning methods, is designed to control the vehicle active suspension system (VASS). Experimental data were trained by supervised learning method (regression method). The data were obtained from an optimal linear quadratic controller tuned based on a full state feedback optimal control approach. The results demonstrated that the proposed machine learning (ML) based ground-penetrating radar (GPR) controller outperforms the optimal controller under uncertainties in terms of reducing the oscillation in sprung mass position with a 15% and 21.64% reduction for square and random road conditions, respectively.

🔖

Cite This Article

KALELİ, A. R., AKOLAŞ, H. İ. (2022). Development of Machine Learning Based Control System for Vehicle Active Suspension System. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 421–428. https://ajindex.com/articles/466551

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. L. Sitnik, M. Magdziak-Tokłowicz, R. Wróbel, and P. Kardasz, “Vehicle Vibration in Human Health,” J. KONES. Powertrain Transp., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 411–418, 2015, doi: 10.5604/12314005.1137854
  2. Y. Shahid and M. Wei, “Comparative analysis of different model-based controllers using active vehicle suspension system,” Algorithms, vol. 13, no. 1, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.3390/a13010010
  3. J. Watton, K. M. Holford, and P. Surawattanawan, “The application of a programmable servo controller to state control of an electrohydraulic active suspension,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D J. Automob. Eng., vol. 218, no. 12, pp. 1367–1377, Dec. 2004, doi: 10.1243/0954407042707650
  4. H. Pang, X. Zhang, J. Yang, and Y. Shang, “Adaptive backstepping-based control design for uncertain nonlinear active suspension system with input delay,” Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, vol. 29, no. 16, pp. 5781–5800, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1002/rnc.4695
  5. L. Ovalle, H. Ríos, and H. Ahmed, “Robust Control for an Active Suspension System via Continuous Sliding-Mode Controllers,” Eng. Sci. Technol. an Int. J., 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jestch.2021.06.006
  6. W. Sun, H. Gao, and O. Kaynak, “Adaptive backstepping control for active suspension systems with hard constraints,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1072–1079, 2013, doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2012.2204765
  7. N. Yagiz and Y. Hacioglu, “Backstepping control of a vehicle with active suspensions,” Control Eng. Pract., vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1457–1467, Dec. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2008.04.003
  8. S. Kilicaslan, “Control of active suspension system considering nonlinear actuator dynamics,” Nonlinear Dyn., vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 1383–1394, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1007/S11071-017-3951-X
  9. I. Fialho and G. J. Balas, “Road adaptive active suspension design using linear parameter-varying gain- scheduling,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 43–54, Jan. 2002, doi: 10.1109/87.974337
  10. L.-X. Guo, L.-P. Zhang, L.-X. Guo, and L.-P. Zhang, “Robust H∞ control of active vehicle suspension under non-stationary running,” JSV, vol. 331, no. 26, pp. 5824–5837, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1016/J.JSV.2012.07.042
  11. Y. Taskin, Y. Hacioglu, and N. Yagiz, “Experimental evaluation of a fuzzy logic controller on a quarter car test rig,” J. Brazilian Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng., vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 2433–2445, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s40430-016-0637-0
  12. U. Rashid, M. Jamil, S. O. Gilani, and I. K. Niazi, “LQR based training of adaptive neuro-