SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon / 2008 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4

DETERMINING QUALIFICATION LEVEL OF BUSINESS PROCESSES OF AN ORGANISATION WORKING IN READY-MADE GARMENT SECTOR

BİR KONFEKSİYON İŞLETMESİNDE İŞ SÜREÇLERİNİN NİTELİK SEVİYESİNİN BELİRLENMESİ

Senem ŞAHAN VAHAPLAR
Ali ŞEN
Pages
251–257
Publication Date
2008-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the case study, the process, which was qualified at level 6 at the beginning of the improvement studies, is upgraded to level 5

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper presents a case study of Harrington qualification criteria in ready-made garment sector with the aim of improving the process by using the cause and effect relationship between process qualification and process performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Harrington criteria qualifies business processes in one of six levels, examining whether they satisfy the requirements determined for eight change areas; endcustomer related measurements, process measurements and/or performance, supplier partnerships, documentation, training, benchmarking, process adaptability and continuous improvement.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the case study, the process, which was qualified at level 6 at the beginning of the improvement studies, is upgraded to level 5
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Süreç performans kriterleri · Performans ölçümü · Harrington nitelendirme kriterleri

Abstract

This paper presents a case study of Harrington qualification criteria in ready-made garment sector with the aim of improving the process by using the cause and effect relationship between process qualification and process performance. Harrington criteria qualifies business processes in one of six levels, examining whether they satisfy the requirements determined for eight change areas; endcustomer related measurements, process measurements and/or performance, supplier partnerships, documentation, training, benchmarking, process adaptability and continuous improvement. As a result of the case study, the process, which was qualified at level 6 at the beginning of the improvement studies, is upgraded to level 5

Özet

Bu çalışmada, konfeksiyon sektöründe Harrington kriterlerinin uygulanması üzerine bir alan çalışması sunulmaktadır. Çalışmanın amacı; süreç niteliği ve süreç performansı arasındaki sebep-sonuç ilişkisini kullanarak tekstil iş sürecinde iyileşme sağlamaktır. Harrington kriterleri iş süreçlerini altı seviyede sınıflandırır. Bu sınıflandırmayı yaparken sürecin, sekiz değişim alanı için belirlenmiş gereklilikleri sağlayıp sağlamadığına bakar. Sekiz değişim alanı; son müşteri ile ilgili ölçümler, süreç ölçümleri ve/veya performansı, tedarikçi ilişkileri, dokümantasyon, eğitim, kıyaslama, süreç adaptasyonu ve sürekli gelişimdir. Yapılan alan çalışmasının sonucunda; süreç iyileştirme çalışmalarının başında 6. seviyede olan tekstil iş süreci 5. seviyeye yükseltilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

VAHAPLAR, S. Ş., ŞEN, A. (2008). DETERMINING QUALIFICATION LEVEL OF BUSINESS PROCESSES OF AN ORGANISATION WORKING IN READY-MADE GARMENT SECTOR. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4, 251–257. https://ajindex.com/articles/46446

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Khan, Z., Bali, R.K., Wickramasinghe, N., 2007, “Developing a BPI Framework and PAM for SMEs”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 107, Issue 3, pp. 345-360
  2. Lockamy III, A. and Cox III, J.F., 1995, “An Empirical Study of Division and Plant Performance Measurement Systems in Selected World Class Manufacturing Firms: Linkages for Competitive Advantage”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 33, Issue 1, pp. 221-236
  3. Newall, D. and Dale, B.G., 1991, “The Introduction and Development of a Quality Improvement Process: A Case Study”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 29, Issue 9, pp. 1747-1760
  4. Gelders, L., Mannaerts, P., Maes, J., 1994, “Manufacturing Strategy, Performance Indicators and Improvement Programmes”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 32, Issue 4, pp.797-805
  5. International Organisation for Standardisation. Understanding process approach. Available from: http://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink/3554122/APGUnderstandProcessApproach.doc? func = doc.Fetch&nodeid=3554122, Accessed 27 August 2007
  6. Praxiom Research Group Limited. ISO’s process approach. Available from: http://www.praxiom.com/process-approach.htm, Accessed 27 August 2007
  7. QPR (Quality, Processes, Results) Software Plc. Business process management. Available from: http://www.qpr.com/Solutions/Business_Process_Management/index.html, Accessed 27 August 2007
  8. Harrington, H. J., 1991, Business Process Improvement, The Breakthrough Strategy for Total Quality, Productivity, and Competitiveness, McGraw-Hill, USA
  9. Şahan Vahaplar, S. and Şen, A., 2006, “The Use of Harrington Criteria in Business Process Performance Management”, Advances in Business and Management: Theory and Applications, edited by Coskun Can Aktan, Vol. 3 (Selected Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Business, Management and Economics, Organised by Yaşar University 15-18 June 2006, Çeşme-İzmir, Turkey), pp. 235-254
  10. Andersen, B., 1999, Business Process Improvement Toolbox, American Society for Quality, USA
  11. Chin, K.-S., Zu, X., Mok, C.K., Tam, H.Y., 2006, “Integrated Integration Definition Language 0 (IDEF) and Coloured Petri Nets (CPN) Modelling and Simulation Tool: A Study on Mould-Making Processes”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 44, Issue 16, pp.3179-3205
  12. Knowledge Based Systems. Integrated definition methods. Available from: http://www.idef.com/idef0.html, Accessed 17 September 2007
  13. Feldmann, C.