SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bezmiâlem Science / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Effect of Mouthrinses on Water Sorption and Solubility ofFlouride-Releasing Restorative Materials

Fluorid Salabilen Restoratif Materyallerin Su Emilimi Ve Çözünürlüğü Üzerine Gargaraların Etkisi

Neslihan ÖZVEREN
Ezgi BALTACI
Sinem BATUR KARA
Pages
68–74
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Data were statistically analyzed (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to investigate water sorption/solubility behavior of glass ionomer cement-based-containing restorative materials.Methods: A total of 21 specimens for each material (Riva Self Cure, Riva Light Cure, GCP Glass Fill) were prepared using a teflon ring (10x2 mm).
📊
Key Findings & Data:These specimens were stored in a desiccator for 24 hours at 37±1 ºC and the weight of each sample was measured using a sensitive balance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Data were statistically analyzed (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:21 specimens
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate water sorption/solubility behavior of glass ionomer cement-based-containing restorative materials.Methods: A total of 21 specimens for each material (Riva Self Cure, Riva Light Cure, GCP Glass Fill) were prepared using a teflon ring (10x2 mm). These specimens were stored in a desiccator for 24 hours at 37±1 ºC and the weight of each sample was measured using a sensitive balance. Afterwards, the specimens were stored in an incubator containing distilled water, mouthrinse with alcohol, and mouthrinse without alcohol at 37±1 ºC for one day. The specimens were later dried to a constant mass in a desiccator, and each specimen was measured using a digital electronic caliper. Data were statistically analyzed (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, cam iyonomer siman bazlı restoratifmateryallerin su emilimi ve çözünürlüğü özelliklerini araştırmaktır. Yöntemler: Teflon halkalar (10x2 mm) kullanılarak her bir materyal(Riva Self Cure, Riva Light Cure, GCP Glass Fill) için toplam 21örnek hazırlandı. Örnekler desikatör içerisine yerleştirilerek 24 saat37±1 ºC’de bekletildi ve bu süre sonunda her örneğin ağırlığı hassasterazi ile ölçüldü. Aynı örnekler daha sonra üç gruba ayrılarak birgün boyunca distile su, alkollü gargara ve alkolsüz gargara içerensolüsyonlarda 37±1 ºC’de saklandı. Örnekler sabit bir kütleyegelinceye kadar tekrar desikatörde kurutuldu. Her örneğin çapve kalınlıkları dijital elektronik kumpas kullanılarak ölçüldü.Veriler one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey testleri kullanılarakdeğerlendirildi ve alfa hata düzeyi 0,05 olarak seçildi. Bulgular: Su emilim değerleri, resin modifiye cam iyonomer simangrubu için yüksek viskoziteli cam iyonomer siman (HVGIC)grubundan üç farklı ortamın hepsinde anlamlı olarak yüksekbulunmuştur (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZVEREN, N., BALTACI, E., KARA, S. B. (2022). Effect of Mouthrinses on Water Sorption and Solubility ofFlouride-Releasing Restorative Materials. Bezmiâlem Science, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 68–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/463927

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Bhatia HP, Singh S, Sood S, Sharma N. A Comparative Evaluation of Sorption, Solubility, and Compressive Strength of Three Different Glass Ionomer Cements in Artificial Saliva: An in vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2017;10:49-54
  2. Terry DA, Leinfelder KF, Maragos C. Developing form, function, and natural aesthetics with laboratory-processed composite resin-- Part I. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2005;17:313-8; quiz 320
  3. Naasan M, Watson T. Conventional glass ionomers as posterior restorations. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 1998;11:36-45
  4. Gao W, Peng D, Smales RJ, Yip KH-K. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months. Quintessence Int 2003;34:31-7
  5. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:280-301
  6. Mitra SB, Kedrowski BL. Long-term mechanical properties of glass ionomers. Dent Mater 1994;10:78-82
  7. Uno S, Finger WJ, Fritz U. Long-term mechanical characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Dent Mater 1996;12:64-9
  8. Çapan BŞ, Akyüz S. Current fluoride-releasing restorative materials used in pediatric dentistry. Clin Exp Health Sci 2016;6:129-34
  9. Koenraads H, Van der Kroon G, Frencken J. Compressive strength of two newly developed glass-ionomer materials for use with the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach in class II cavities. Dent Mater 2009;25:551-6
  10. Algera TJ, Kleverlaan CJ, Prahl-Andersen B, Feilzer AJ. The influence of environmental conditions on the material properties of setting glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2006;22:852-6
  11. Hinoura K, Onose H, Masutani S, Matsuzaki T, Moore B. Volumetric change of light cured glass ionomer in water. J Dent Res 1993;72:222
  12. Soderholm KJ, Zigan M, Ragan M, Fischlschweiger W, Bergman M. Hydrolytic degradation of dental composites. J Dent Res 1984;63:1248-54
  13. Burt BA. Prevention policies in the light of the changed distribution of dental caries. Acta Odontol Scand 1998;56:179-86
  14. Aguiar FHB, Lima DANL, Paulillo LAMS, Lovadino JR. Effect of light curing modes and ethanol immersion media on the susceptibility of a microhybrid composite resin to staining. J Appl Oral Sci 2007;15:105-9
  15. Cavalcanti AN, Mitsui F, Ambrosano G, Mathias P, Marchi GM. Effect of different mouthrinses on Knoop hardness of a restorative composite. Am J Dent 2005;18