SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

Art as a Method of Representation in Social Sciences

Sosyal Bilimlerde Bir Temsil Yöntemi Olarak Sanat

Umut DAĞISTAN
Pages
255–269
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study claims that the social sciences can benefit from the rich world of art in order to understand people and society

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is so the arts and social sciences may interact in understanding the human being and the social, political and economic structure that he creates.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Positivist epistemology is based on the basic principles in which reason, truth, and validity are at the forefront.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study claims that the social sciences can benefit from the rich world of art in order to understand people and society
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is so the arts and social sciences may interact in understanding the human being and the social, political and economic structure that he creates. Positivist epistemology is based on the basic principles in which reason, truth, and validity are at the forefront. Researchers who adopt this epistemology restrict information as a form that only the five senses can perceive. Science and art basically share the same motivation and pursue the same story: what is human? In this study, it is assumed that the ability to represent society is not only inherent in scientific studies. Fiction works, dramas, films, paintings, photographs, music, and all artistic disciplines also say something about the society in which they emerge. The Social Sciences ' use of these fields will enable it to enrich itself. This study claims that the social sciences can benefit from the rich world of art in order to understand people and society

Özet

Stuart, K. (1970). William Faulkner as Sociologist: An Adventure in the Sociologyof Literature. (MA Thesis). Kentucky: Western Kentucky University. Watson, T. J. (2000). Ethnographic Fiction Science: Making Sense of ManagerialWork and Organizational Research Processes with Caroline and Terry. Or ganization, 7 (3), 489-510. Watson, C. (2011). Staking a Small Claim for Fictional Narratives in Social andEducational Research. Qualitative Research, 11 (4), 395-408. Weber, M. (2011). Methodology of Social Sciences. New Jersey: Transaction Publis hers. Whiteman, G. & Phillips, N. (2006). The Role of Narrative Fiction and Semi Fiction in Organizational Studies. ERIM Report Series Research in Manage ment. Rotterdam. Wiley, N. (1988). The Macro-Micro Problem in Social Theory. Sociological Theory,6 (2), 254-261. Wolff, L. (2014). Let's Talk about Lex: Narrative Analysis as Both Research Met hod and Teaching Technique in Law. Adelaide Law Review, 35 (1), 3-21

🔖

Cite This Article

DAĞISTAN, U. (2022). Art as a Method of Representation in Social Sciences. Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 255–269. https://ajindex.com/articles/463811

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Badiou, A. (2002). Ethics. (Trans. P. Hallward). London & New York: Verso. Bahou, V. (1961). Social Science and Literature. Peabody Journal of Education, 39 (3), 162-168.
  2. Baker, K. M. (1969). The Early History of the Term Social Science. Annales of Science, 20 (3), 211-226.
  3. Bauman, Z. (1993). Postmodern Etchics. Oxford: Blackwell. Becker, H. S. (2007). Telling About Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  4. Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (1991). The Social Construction of Reality. London: Penguin Books. Bourdieu, P. (1987). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  5. Carlin, A. P. (2010). The Corpus Status of Literatute in Teaching Sociology: Novel as Sociological Reconstruction. American Sociologist, 41 (3), 211-231.
  6. Clifford, J. & Marcus, G. E. (ed.) (1986). Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Etnography. California: University of California Press.
  7. Coser, L. A. (1963). Sociology through Literature: An Introductory Reader. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Di Meglio, M. (2004). The Social Sciences and Alternative Disciplinary Models. Overcoming the Two Cultures: Science versus the Humanities in the Modern WorldSystem. (Ed. R. E. Lee). Boulder: Paradigm Publishers, 55-72.
  8. Eskridge, R (2003). The Enduring Relationship of Science and Art. Erişim Tarihi: 26.05.2019. http://www.artic.edu/aic/education/sciarttech/2a1.html.
  9. Fischer, E. (2010). The Necessity of Art. London & New York: Verso. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings. New York: Vintage Books. Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of the Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin Books. Hatch, M. J. & Cunliffe, A. L. (2006). Organization Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
  10. Hegtvedt, K. A. (1991). Teaching the Sociology of Literature through Literature. Teaching Sociology, 19 (1), 1-12.
  11. Hoggart, R. (1966). Literature and Society. A Guide to the Social Sciences. (Ed. N. Mackenzie). Letcworh: The Garden City Press, 225-248.
  12. Jones, R. A. (1975). The use of Literature in Teaching Introductory Sociology. Teaching Sociology, 2 (2), 177-96.
  13. Knorr, C. K. (1994). Primitive Classification and Postmodernity: towards a Sociological Notion of Fiction. Theory, Culture and Society, 11 (1), 1-22.
  14. Lass, A. H. (1998). 100 Büyük Roman 1. (çev. N. Muallimoğlu). İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları.
  15. Lefebvre, H. (1991). Critique of Everyday Life. (Trans. J. Moore). London & New York: Verso. Macbeth, D. (1992)