SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Beykoz Akademi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

A SUMMARY OF KALECKIAN AND KALDORIAN MODELS ON INCOME DISTRIBUTION

GELİR DAĞILIMI ÜZERİNE KALECKİYEN VE KALDORCU MODELLERİN BİR ÖZETİ

Fatma Pınar ARSLAN
Pages
266–276
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article includes asummary of Kaleckian and Kaldorian models; their assumptions and recent contributions tothese models.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There are two main lines of theories about income distribution, following the seminal papers ofKalecki and Kaldor.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These two theories have different aspect in terms of their assumptions aboutcompetitive characteristics of market, capital utilization, market imperfections and the role ofgovernment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article includes asummary of Kaleckian and Kaldorian models; their assumptions and recent contributions tothese models.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

There are two main lines of theories about income distribution, following the seminal papers ofKalecki and Kaldor. These two theories have different aspect in terms of their assumptions aboutcompetitive characteristics of market, capital utilization, market imperfections and the role ofgovernment. Several studies are designed to develop these two theories and some studies useassumptions of both theories in order to explain the income distribution. This article includes asummary of Kaleckian and Kaldorian models; their assumptions and recent contributions tothese models.

Özet

Gelir dağılımı üzerine, Kalecki ve Kaldor’un öncülük ettiği ve başkaları tarafından geliştirilen iki ana teori vardır. Bu teoriler piyasanın rekabetçi özellikleri, sermaye kullanımı, piyasa aksaklıkları ve kamu sektörünün rolü ile ilgili farklı varsayımlar üzerine kuruludur. Bu teoriler başka çalışmalarda geliştirilmiştir; ayrıca iki teorik çizgiden de bazı parçalar alan çalışmalar mevcuttur. Bu makale, Kalecki ve Kaldor’un modellerinin, bunların varsayımlarının ve bu modellere yapılan katkıların bir özetini sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, F. P. (2022). A SUMMARY OF KALECKIAN AND KALDORIAN MODELS ON INCOME DISTRIBUTION. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 266–276. https://ajindex.com/articles/463665

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Barro, R. J. (1974). Are Government Bonds Net Wealth? Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 1095–1117. https://doi.org/10.1086/260266 D’Erasmo, P., & Mendoza, E. G. (2016). Distributional Incentives in an Equilibrium Model of Domestic Sovereign Default. Journal of the European Economic Association, 14(1), 7–44.
  2. Diamond, P. A. (1965). National Debt in a Neoclassical Growth Model. American Economic Review, 55(5), 1126. Retrieved from bth. Flodén, M. (2001). The effectiveness of government debt and transfers as insurance. Journal of Monetary Economics, 48(1), 81–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(01)00064-2
  3. Hein, E. (2007). Interest rate, debt, distribution and capital accumulation in a post-Kaleckian model. Metroeconomica, 58(2), 310–339.
  4. Hein, E. (2018). Autonomous government expenditure growth, deficits, debt, and distribution in a neo-Kaleckian growth model. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2017.1422389
  5. Kaldor, N. (1955). Alternative Theories of Distribution. The Review of Economic Studies, 23(2), 83. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296292
  6. Kalecki, M. (1938). The Determinants of Distribution of the National Income. Econometrica, 6(2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907142
  7. Kalecki, M. (1954). Theory of economic dynamics: An essay on cyclical and long-run changes in capitalist economy (Reprinted). London: Routledge. Mankiw. (2000). The Savers-Spenders Theory of Fiscal Policy. American Economic Review, 90(May), 120–125.
  8. Modigliani, F. (1961). Long-Run Implications of Alternative Fiscal Policies and the Burden of the National Debt. The Economic Journal, 71(284), 730–755. https://doi.org/10.2307/2228247
  9. Palley, T. I. (1997). Aggregate Demand and Endogenous Growth: A Generalized Keynes- Kaldor Model of Economic Growth. Metroeconomica, 48(2), 161–176.
  10. Palley, T. I. (2012). Wealth and wealth distribution in the neo-Kaleckian growth model. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 34(3), 453–474. https://doi.org/10.2753/PKE0160- 3477340304 Pasinetti, L. L. (1962). Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in Relation to the Rate of Economic Growth. The Review of Economic Studies, 29(4), 267. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296303
  11. Pasinetti, L. L. (1989). Ricardian debt/taxation equivalence in the Kaldor theory of profits and income distribution. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 13(1), 25–36.
  12. Samuelson, P. A., & Modigliani, F. (1966). The Pasinetti Paradox in Neoclassical and More General Models. The Review of Economic Studies, 33(4), 269.