Journals / Beykoz Akademi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

RELATIONS BETWEEN WORKPLACE BULLYING, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS AND COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIOURS: A STUDY AT LOGISTICS COMPANY

İŞ YERİ ZORBALIĞI, SORUMLULUK VE ÜRETKENLİK KARŞITI İŞ DAVRANIŞLARI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLER: LOJİSTİK ŞİRKETİNDE BİR ÇALIŞMA

Pages
117–136
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to findings it was revealed out thatconscientiousness has a moderation role in the interaction between workplace bullying andcounterproductive work behaviors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Employee behaviors gets popular in today’s academic and business environment because of itsimpact on organizational outcomes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Especially, increase of the dark attitudes of managers andcolleagues towards the individuals, affects the formation of employees’ deviance behaviors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to findings it was revealed out thatconscientiousness has a moderation role in the interaction between workplace bullying andcounterproductive work behaviors.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Employee behaviors gets popular in today’s academic and business environment because of itsimpact on organizational outcomes. Especially, increase of the dark attitudes of managers andcolleagues towards the individuals, affects the formation of employees’ deviance behaviors. Inthis context, workplace bullying is considered as one of the types of destructive approaches inorganizations that excluding someone in social environment or influencing co-workers jobsustainability with the harassment and offending emotions. Rising of workplace bullying inorganizations leads employees to demonstrate negative behaviors which are defined ascounterproductive work behaviors. On the other side, personality traits of an employee mayhave a major role in transformation of perception of negative attitudes towards to the workoutcomes. For this reason, it was aimed to find out the role of conscientiousness, one of thepersonality traits of Five Factor Model, in the interaction between workplace bullying andcounterproductive work behaviors. Statistical analyzes were made with the participation of204 employees of a logistics company. According to findings it was revealed out thatconscientiousness has a moderation role in the interaction between workplace bullying andcounterproductive work behaviors.

Özet

Çalışan davranışları, örgütsel sonuçlar üzerindeki etkisi nedeniyle günümüzün akademik ve iş ortamında popüler hale gelmektedir. Özellikle yöneticilerin ve meslektaşların kişilere yönelik karanlık tutumlarının artması, çalışanların sapma davranışlarının oluşumunu etkilemektedir. Bu bağlamda, işyeri zorbalığı, organizasyonlarda bir çalışanı dışlayan veya iş arkadaşlarının iş sürdürülebilirliğini taciz ve rahatsız edici duygularla etkileyen yıkıcı yaklaşım türlerinden biri olarak kabul edilmektedir. Örgütlerde işyerinde zorbalığın artması, çalışanların üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışları olarak tanımlanan olumsuz davranışlar sergilemelerine yol açmaktadır. Diğer taraftan, bir çalışanın kişilik özellikleri, olumsuz tutum algısının iş sonuçlarına dönüştürülmesinde önemli bir rol oynayabilir. Bu nedenle, beş faktör kişilik özelliklerinden sorumluluğun, işyerinde zorbalık ve üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışları arasındaki etkileşimde rolünün belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Lojistik şirketinin 204 çalışanının katılımıyla istatistiksel analizler yapılmıştır. Bulgulara göre, işyerinde zorbalık ve üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışları arasındaki etkileşimde sorumluluğun düzenleyici rolü olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÜÇÜKOĞLU, M. T., AKCA, M. (2022). RELATIONS BETWEEN WORKPLACE BULLYING, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS AND COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIOURS: A STUDY AT LOGISTICS COMPANY. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 117–136. https://ajindex.com/articles/463661

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Abas, C., Omar, F., Halim, F. W., & Hafidz, S. W. M. (2015). The mediating role of organizational-based self-esteem in perceived organizational support and counterproductive work behaviour relationship. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(9), 99-108.
  2. Abdullah, A., & Halim, F. W. (2016). The influence of work ethic and counterproductive work behaviour of civil servants. Journal of Technology Management and Business, 3(1), 1-14.
  3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological bulletin, 84(5), 888-918.
  4. Akgündüz, Y., and Akdağ, G. (2014). İşgörenlerin kişilik özelliklerinin temel benlik değerlendirmelerine ve işten ayrılma niyetlerine etkisi. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(24), 295-318.
  5. Ayoko, O., Callan, V. and Härtel, C. (2003),
  6. Workplace Conflict, Bullying, and Counterproductive Behaviors. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 11(4), 283-301.
  7. Bamberger, P. A., & Bacharach, S. B. (2006). Abusive supervision and subordinate problem drinking: Taking resistance, stress and subordinate personality into account. Human Relations, 59, 723–752.
  8. Barlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W., & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information technology, learning, and performance journal, 19(1), 43-50.
  9. Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of applied psychology, 85(3), 349-360.
  10. Berry, C. M., Ones, D. S., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 92(2), 410-424.
  11. Berthelsen M, Skogstad A, Lau B, Einarsen S (2011) Do they stay or do they go? A longitudinal study of intentions to leave and exclusion from working life among targets of workplace bullying. Int J Manpower, 32(2), 178–193.
  12. Björkqvist, K, Österman, K. ve Hjelt-Bäck, M. (1994). Aggression among university employees. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 173-184
  13. Boddy, C. R. (2014). Corporate psychopaths, conflict, employee affective well-being and counterproductive work behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(1), 107-121.
  14. Bolton, L. R., Becker, L. K., & Barber, L. K. (2010). Big Five trait predictors of differential counterproductive work behavior dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(5), 537-541.
  15. Bowling, N. A., Burns, G. N., Stewart, S. M., & Gruys, M. L. (201