SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

EVALUATING THE DECISION OF INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CONCERNING THE OIL PLATFORMS

ULUSLARARASI ADALET DİVANI’NIN PETROL PLATFORMLARI’NA İLİŞKİN KARARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Saeed BAGHERİ
Pages
1155–1180
Publication Date
2013-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

After evaluating the claims and requests of the dispute parties, in its November 2003 decision the Court found the attacks of US Military Forces on Iranian oil platforms on 19 October 1987 and 18 April 1988 contrary to the provisions of 1955 Treaty Amity and rules of international law.The purpose of the study is evaluate of historical back ground of the dispute arising between the two countries, the jurisdiction of the Court in this case, claims of the paties, in particular the United States claim of self-defense

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study Oil Platforms Case that was presented to ICJ as the principal judicial organ of the United Nations (UN) by Iran and United States in 1992 is discussed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The parties have recognized the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court under 1955 Treaty Amity between Iran and US.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:After evaluating the claims and requests of the dispute parties, in its November 2003 decision the Court found the attacks of US Military Forces on Iranian oil platforms on 19 October 1987 and 18 April 1988 contrary to the provisions of 1955 Treaty Amity and rules of international law.The purpose of the study is evaluate of historical back ground of the dispute arising between the two countries, the jurisdiction of the Court in this case, claims of the paties, in particular the United States claim of self-defense
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Uluslararası Adalet Divanı · Uluslararası Hukuk · Kuvvet Kullanma Yasağı

Abstract

In this study Oil Platforms Case that was presented to ICJ as the principal judicial organ of the United Nations (UN) by Iran and United States in 1992 is discussed. The parties have recognized the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court under 1955 Treaty Amity between Iran and US. After evaluating the claims and requests of the dispute parties, in its November 2003 decision the Court found the attacks of US Military Forces on Iranian oil platforms on 19 October 1987 and 18 April 1988 contrary to the provisions of 1955 Treaty Amity and rules of international law.The purpose of the study is evaluate of historical back ground of the dispute arising between the two countries, the jurisdiction of the Court in this case, claims of the paties, in particular the United States claim of self-defense

Özet

Bu çalışmada 1992’de İran ve ABD tarafından Birleşmiş Milletler (BM)’in başlıca yargı organı olan Uluslararası Adalet Divanı’na sunulan Petrol Platformları Davası incelenmiştir. Tarafl ar, Divan’ın zorunlu yargı yetkisini yürürlükte olan, uyuşmazlıkların zorunlu çözümünü düzenleyen Dostluk Antlaşması (1955) ile kabul etmişlerdir. Divan, tarafl arın iddialarını, itirazlarını ve taleplerini değerlendirdikten sonra Kasım 2003 tarihindeki kararında ABD’nin silâhlı kuvvetlrinin 19 Ekim 1987 ve 18 Nisan 1988 tarihlerinde İran petrol platformlarına yönelik saldırılarının iki taraf arasındaki 1955 tarihli Dostluk Antlaşması hükümleri ve uluslararası hukuka aykırı bulmuştur.Çalışmanın amacı iki ülke arasında ortaya çıkan uyuşmazlığın tarihi arka planı, Divan’ın bu davaya ilişkin yargı yetkisini, tarafl arın iddialarını, özellikle ABD’nin meşru müdafaa iddiası konusunu değerlendirmektir

🔖

Cite This Article

BAGHERİ, S. (2013). EVALUATING THE DECISION OF INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CONCERNING THE OIL PLATFORMS. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 1155–1180. https://ajindex.com/articles/462723

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. ALEXANDROV, Stanimir, Self – Defense Against the Use of Force in International Law, First ed., Netherlands 1996.
  2. ARAL, Berdal, Uluslararası Hukukta Meşru Müdafaa Hakkı, Ankara 1999.
  3. BROWNLIE, Ian, Law and the Use of Force by the States, First ed., Oxford 1963.
  4. BROWNLIE, Ian, Principle Public International Law, 4th ed., Oxford 1995.
  5. BROWNLIE, Ian, The Principle of Non – Use of Force, (Edit) William BUTLER; The Non- Use of Force International Law, London 1989.
  6. DAY, Erin, Economic Sanctions Imposed by the United States Against Specifi c Countries: 1979 Through 1992, Washington 1992.
  7. D. GILL, Terry, “Litigation Strategy in the Nicaraguan Case at the International Court”, in: Yoram Dinstein & Mala Tabory; International Law at a Time of Perplexıty, Netherlands 1989.
  8. GREIG, D. Westlake, Internatioanal Law, London 1970.
  9. F. DAMROSCH, Lori & Others, International Law: Cases and Materials, Fourth ed., United States 2001.
  10. HYDE, Charles Cheney, International Law Chiefl y as Interpreted and Applied by the United States, Vol. 3, Boston 1945.
  11. H. BAŞEREN, Sertaç, Uluslararası Hukukta Devletlerin Münferiden Kuvvet Kullanmalarının Sınırları, Ankara 2003.
  12. İNAN, Yüksel, Uluslararası Adalet Divanı’nın Yargı Yetkisi, Ankara 1982.
  13. J. SCHEFFER, David, Introduction: The Gerat Debate of the 1980s, Louis Henkin & Others (Ed.), Right v. Might, International Law and the Use of Force, New York 1989.
  14. KESKİN, Funda, Uluslararası Hukukta Kuvvet Kullanma: Savaş, Karışma ve Birleşmiş Milletler, Ankara 1998.
  15. PAZARCI, Hüseyin, Uluslararası Hukuk Dersleri, Cilt: 3, Ankara 1999.
  16. E. FOSTER, Caroline, The Oil Platforms Case and the Use of Force in International Law, Singapore Journal of International & Comparative Law, Vol. 7, 2003, ss. 579-588.
  17. H. F. BEKKER, Pieter, The World Court Finds that U.S. Attacks on Iranian Oil Platforms in 1987-1988 Were Not Justifiable as Self-Defense, but the United States Did Not Violate the Applicable Treaty With Iran, ASIL Insights, 2003, (http://www.asil.org/insigh119.cfm, erişim 12.11.2012)
  18. H. TAFT, William, Self-Defense and the Oil Platforms Decision, The Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 29: 291, 2004, ss. 295-306.
  19. HENKIN, Louis, The Reports of the Death of Article 2 (4) Are Greatly Exaggreated, AJIL, Vol. 65, 1971, ss. 544-548.
  20. INTOCCIA, Gregory Francis, American Bombing of Libya: An International Legal Analysis, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, Vol. 19, 1987, ss. 177-213.
  21. JENNINGS, R.Y, The Caroline and McLeod Cases, AJIL, Vol. 32, No.