SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon / 2013 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2

THERMOGRAVIMETRIC, MICROSCOPIC AND MECHANICAL ANALYSES OF PBT AND PET YARNS

PBT VE PET İPLİKLERİN TERMOGRAVİMETRİK, MİKROSKOPİK VE MEKANİK ANALİZLERİ

Buket ARIK
Ebru BOZACI
Aslı DEMİR
Esen ÖZDOĞAN
Pages
101–106
Publication Date
2013-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, it was determined that PBT had a lower Tdi value, higher char residue, lower tensile strength compared to regular PET and similar surface characteristics to regular PET.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, thermogravimetric, microscopic and mechanical properties of different types of polyester yarns were investigated and compared.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To this goal, PET based regular polyester yarn and polyester yarns modified for various specialities (flame-retardant, UV protective and antibacterial) and PBT yarn were selected.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, it was determined that PBT had a lower Tdi value, higher char residue, lower tensile strength compared to regular PET and similar surface characteristics to regular PET.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:PET · PBT · Termogravimetri

Abstract

In this study, thermogravimetric, microscopic and mechanical properties of different types of polyester yarns were investigated and compared. To this goal, PET based regular polyester yarn and polyester yarns modified for various specialities (flame-retardant, UV protective and antibacterial) and PBT yarn were selected. According to the results, it was determined that PBT had a lower Tdi value, higher char residue, lower tensile strength compared to regular PET and similar surface characteristics to regular PET. Among the modification processes, only the flame retardancy process was found to affect the thermal property

Özet

Bu çalışmada, farklı tipte poliester ipliklerinin termogravimetrik, mikroskopik ve mekanik özellikleri incelenmiş ve karşılaştırılmıştır. Bu amaçla, PET esaslı normal poliester ipliği ve çeşitli özellikler (güç tutuşurluk, ultraviole koruyuculuk ve antibakteriyel) kazandırılmak için modifiye edilmiş poliester iplikleri ve PBT ipliği seçilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, normal PET ipliği ile kıyaslandığında, PBT ipliğinin daha düşük Tdi değerine, daha yüksek kömürleşmiş kalıntıya, daha düşük kopma mukavemetine ve benzer yüzey özelliklerine sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Modifikasyon işlemleri arasında ise yalnızca güç tutuşurluk işleminin termal özellik üzerinde değişikliğe sebep olduğu anlaşılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

ARIK, B., BOZACI, E., DEMİR, A., ÖZDOĞAN, E. (2013). THERMOGRAVIMETRIC, MICROSCOPIC AND MECHANICAL ANALYSES OF PBT AND PET YARNS. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2, 101–106. https://ajindex.com/articles/46258

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Edwards JV, Buschle-Diller G, and Goheen SC, 2006, “Modified Fibers with Medical and Specialty Applications, Modification of Polyester for Medical Uses” Bide, M., and Phaneuf, M. (eds), Springer, Netherlands, Ch. 7, 91-125
  2. Koç SK, and Hockenberger AŞ, 2010, “Investigation Of Air-Jet Texturing Of Technical Polyester Yarns”, Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, 4, 299-305
  3. Verdu P, Rego1 JM, Nieto J and Blanes M, 2009, “Comfort Analysis of Woven Cotton/Polyester Fabrics Modified with a New Elastic Fiber, Part 1 Preliminary Analysis of Comfort and Mechanical Properties”, Textile Research Journal, 79(1), 14–23
  4. Scheirs J, and Long TE, 2003, “Modern Polyesters, Chemistry and Technology of Polyesters and Copolyesters”, Reese, G., John Wiley and Sons Ltd., England, Ch. 4, 401-433
  5. Zhao L, Hu H and Wang S-H, “Fuzzy-integrative judgment on the end-use performance of knitted fabrics made with polytrimethylene terephthalate blended yarns”, Textile Research Journal, Article in Press
  6. Zhang D, Sun C, Beard J, Zhao W, Carson I. and Hwo C, 2002, “Innovative Polytrimethylene Terephthalate (PTT) Polymers for Technical Nonwovens”, Journal of Industrial Textiles, 31(3), 159-178
  7. Catalani LH, Collins G and Jaffe M, 2007, “Evidence for Molecular Orientation and Residual Charge in the Electrospinning of Poly(butylene terephthalate) Nanofibers”, Macromolecules, 40, 1693-1697
  8. Militky J, Vanicek J, Krystufek and Hartych V, 1991, “Modified Polyester Fibres, Textile Science and Technology”, Elsevier, Ch. 10, 15-140
  9. Yu L, Zhang S, Liu W, Zhu X, Chen X and Chen X, 2010, “Improving the flame retardancy of PET fabric by photo-induced grafting”, Polymer Degradation and Stability, 95, 1934-1942
  10. Saravanan D., 2007, “UV Protection Textile Materials”, AUTEX Research Journal, 7(1), 53-62
  11. Mathew G, Hong JP, Rhee JM, Lee HS and Nah C, 2005, “Preparation and characterization of properties of electrospun poly (butylene terephthalate) nanofibers filled with carbon nanotubes”, Polymer Testing, 24, 712–717
  12. Wang D-Y, Wang Y-Z, Wang J-S, Chen D-Q, Zhou Q, Yang B and Li,W-Y, 2005, “Thermal oxidative degradation behaviors of flame-retardant copolyesters containing phosphorous linked pendent group/montmorillonite nanocomposites”, Polymer Degradation and Stability, 87, 171-176
  13. Chang Y-L, Wang Y-Z, Ban D-M, Yang B and Zhao G-M, 2004, “A Novel Phosphorus-Containing Polymer as a Highly Effective Flame Retardant”, Macromol. Mater. Eng., 289, 703–707
  14. Konwar U, Karak N