Journals / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

Analysis of Airport Performance in Turkey with CRITIC-based EDAS Method

Türkiye’de Havaalanı Performansının CRITIC temelli EDAS Yöntemiyle Analizi

Pages
837–856
Publication Date
2022-08-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, the findings indicate that both national and international events, situations, or crises that occurred in the relevant period did not cause a permanent change in the airport performance ranking.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The air transport industry experienced rapid change and transformation after the second world war.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the second phase, the airport structures experienced a significant transformation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, the findings indicate that both national and international events, situations, or crises that occurred in the relevant period did not cause a permanent change in the airport performance ranking.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Havaalanları · Performans · Çok Kriterli Karar Verme

Abstract

The air transport industry experienced rapid change and transformation after the second world war. After that period, in the first phase, airlines experienced structural change. In the second phase, the airport structures experienced a significant transformation. In this context, the ownership structure of airports has changed, and various practices related to the commercialization and privatization of airports have become widespread. This constrained the examination of airport performance and comparison of airports in terms of performance. Therefore, this study aims to reveal the performance of airports operated by the public in Turkey from 2013 through 2019. Performance analysis revealed by using the CRITIC-based EDAS method for the 15 criteria determined within the scope of the study and the 10 largest airport alternatives in terms of passenger numbers. The results of the study indicate that significant changes occurred in the performance of some airports in the period of 2013-2019. It has been determined that some airports have shown significant improvement in performance, especially in the 2015-2018 period. On the other hand, the findings indicate that both national and international events, situations, or crises that occurred in the relevant period did not cause a permanent change in the airport performance ranking.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı 2013-2019 döneminde Türkiye’de kamu tarafından (DHMİ) işletilen havaalanlarının performansının ortaya çıkarılmasıdır. Çalışmada kapsamında belirlenen 15 kriter, yolcu sayısı açısından en büyük 10 havaalanı alternatifi için CRITIC temelli EDAS yöntemi kullanılarak performans analizini ortaya çıkarılmıştır. Çalışmanın sonuçları, 2013-2019 döneminde bazı havaalanlarının performansında kayda değer değişimlerin meydana geldiğini göstermektedir. Buna karşın bulgular, ilgili dönemde meydana gelen krizlerin havaalanı performans sıralamasında önemli bir değişikliğe neden olmadığına işaret etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KİRACI, K., DURMUŞÇELEBİ, C. (2022). Analysis of Airport Performance in Turkey with CRITIC-based EDAS Method. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 837–856. https://ajindex.com/articles/461846

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Abbott, M., & Wu, S. (2002). Total factor productivity and efficiency of Australian airports. Australian Economic Review, 35(3), 244-260.
  2. Abdel-Basset, M., Gamal, A., Chakrabortty, R. K., & Ryan, M. (2021). A new hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach for location selection of sustainable offshore wind energy stations: A case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124462. Adler, N., Liebert, V., & Yazhemsky, E. (2013). Benchmarking airports from a managerial perspective. Omega, 41(2), 442-458.
  3. Akbulut, O. Y. (2019). CRITIC ve EDAS yöntemleri ile İş Bankası'nın 2009-2018 yılları arasındaki performansının analizi. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 249-263.
  4. Anilkumar, B. C., Maniyeri, R., & Anish, S. (2021). Optimum selection of phase change material for solar box cooker integrated with thermal energy storage unit using multi-criteria decision-making technique. Journal of Energy Storage, 40, 102807. Baltazar, M. E., Rosa, T., & Silva, J. (2018). Global decision support for airport performance and efficiency assessment. Journal of Air Transport Management, 71, 220-242.
  5. Boardman, A. E., & Vining, A. R. (1989). Ownership and performance in competitive environments: A comparison of the performance of private, mixed, and state-owned enterprises. The Journal of Law and Economics, 32(1), 1-33.
  6. Bottasso, A., & Conti, M. (2010). An Assessment on the Cost Structure of the UK Airport Industry: Ownership Outcomes and Long Run Cost Economies. SSRN Electronic Journal. Doi:10.2139/ssrn.1618318 Doi, S., Ghosh, S., Sarker, B., & Chakraborty, S. (2020). An integrated performance evaluation approach for the Indian international airports. Journal of Air Transport Management, 88, 101876. Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763-770. Dožić, S. (2019). Multi-criteria decision making methods: Application in the aviation industry. Journal of Air Transport Management, 79, 101683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jairtraman.2019.101683 Eshtaiwi, M., Badi, I., Abdulshahed, A., & Erkan, T. E. (2018). Determination of key performance indicators for measuring airport success: A case study in Libya. Journal of Air Transport Management, 68, 28-34.
  7. Fan, J. P., Li, Y. J., & Wu, M. Q. (2019). Technology selection based on EDAS cross-efficiency evaluation method. IEEE Access, 7, 58974-58980.
  8. Francis, G., Humphreys, I., & Fry, J. (