Journals / Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon / 2015 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4

EFFECTS OF FIBER CROSS-SECTIONAL SHAPES ON TENSILE AND TEARING PROPERTIES OF POLYESTER WOVEN FABRICS

LİF ENİNE KESİT ŞEKLİNİN POLİESTER DOKUMA KUMAŞLARIN ÇEKME VE YIRTILMA ÖZELLİKLERİ ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİ

Pages
313–318
Publication Date
2015-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The fabrics constituting filaments with round cross-sectional shapes had the highest breaking elongation values It was concluded that the effect of fiber cross-sectional shape on breaking strength and on tearing strength differed from each other

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Breaking load and elongation, and tearing load properties of two type fabrics (plain and twill) woven from polyester fibers having round, hollow round, trilobal and hollow trilobal cross-sectional shapes were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The fabrics produced from full fibers had higher breaking elongation and tearing load values but generally lower breaking load values than the fabrics produced from hollow fibers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The fabrics constituting filaments with round cross-sectional shapes had the highest breaking elongation values It was concluded that the effect of fiber cross-sectional shape on breaking strength and on tearing strength differed from each other
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Lif kesit şekli · Poliester · Dokuma kumaş

Abstract

Breaking load and elongation, and tearing load properties of two type fabrics (plain and twill) woven from polyester fibers having round, hollow round, trilobal and hollow trilobal cross-sectional shapes were investigated. The fabrics produced from full fibers had higher breaking elongation and tearing load values but generally lower breaking load values than the fabrics produced from hollow fibers. The highest breaking load value was obtained in twill fabric woven from filaments having hollow round cross-sectional shape, while the highest tearing load value was obtained in twill fabric woven from filaments having round cross-sectional shape. The fabrics constituting filaments with round cross-sectional shapes had the highest breaking elongation values It was concluded that the effect of fiber cross-sectional shape on breaking strength and on tearing strength differed from each other

Özet

İçi dolu ve içi boş dairesel ve trilobal enine kesite sahip poliester liflerden dokunmuş iki tip (bezayağı ve dimi) kumaşın kopma kuvveti, kopma uzaması ve yırtılma kuvveti özellikleri araştırılmıştır. İçi dolu liflerden üretilmiş kumaşlar içi boş liflerden üretilmiş kumaşlara göre daha yüksek kopma uzaması ve yırtılma kuvveti değerleri gösterirken, genellikle daha düşük kopma kuvveti değerleri göstermişlerdir. En yüksek kopma kuvveti değeri içi boş dairesel filamentlerden dokunmuş dimi kumaşta elde edilirken, en yüksek yırtılma kuvveti değeri içi dolu dairesel kesite sahip filamentlerden dokunmuş dimi kumaşta elde edilmiştir. Dairesel kesitli filamentlerden dokunmuş olan kumaşlar en yüksek kopma uzamasına sahiptir. Lif kesitinin kopma mukavemeti ile yırtılma mukavemeti üzerindeki etkisi birbirinden farklılık göstermektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

KARACA, E., OMEROGLU, S., BECERIR, B. (2015). EFFECTS OF FIBER CROSS-SECTIONAL SHAPES ON TENSILE AND TEARING PROPERTIES OF POLYESTER WOVEN FABRICS. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4, 313–318. https://ajindex.com/articles/46184

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Bueno M.A., Aneia A.P. and Renner M., 2004. “Influence of the shape of fiber cross section on fabric surface characteristics”, Journal of Material Science, 39: 557-564
  2. Oh T.H., Lee M.S., Kim S.Y., et al., 1998. “Studies on melt spinning process of hollow fibers”, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 66: 1209-1217
  3. Takarada W., Ito H., Kikutani T., et al., 2001. “Studies on high speed melt spinning of noncircular cross-section fibers; I. Structure analysis of as-spun fibers”, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 80: 1575-1581
  4. Matsui M., 1994. “The spinning of highly aesthetic fibers, “Advanced Fiber Spinning Technology” Nakajima T (ed), Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, 117-120
  5. Koc S.K., Duzyer S., Berger R., et al., 2012. “Effect of cross-sectional shape on the behaviour of cationic dyeable poly(ethylene terephthalate) fibres”, Textile Research Journal, 82 (13): 1355-1362
  6. Petrulis D., 2004. “Fundamental study of the effect of the fiber wall thickness and inner diameter on the structure of polyamide and polypropylene hollow fibers”, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 92: 2017-2022
  7. Rwei S.P., 2001. “Formation of hollow fibers in melt spinning process”, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 82: 2896-2902
  8. De Rovere A., Shambaugh R.L., 2001. “Melt spun hollow fibers: Modeling and experiments”, Polymer Engineering Science, 41: 1206-1219
  9. Lee M.S., Oh T.H., Kim S.Y., et al. 1999. “Deformation kinetics of polypropylene hollow fibers in a continuous in a process”, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 74: 1836-1845
  10. Wada O., 1992. “Control of fiber form and yarn and fabric structure”, Journal of the Textile Institute, 83: 322-347
  11. Oh T., 2006. “Studies on melt spinning process of hollow polyethylene terephthalate fibers”, Polymer Engineering Science, 46(5): 609-616
  12. Kara S., Erdogan U.H. and Erdem N., 2012. “Effect of polypropylene fiber cross sectional shapes on some structural/mechanical fiber properties and compressibility behaviour of plain knitted fabrics”, Fibers and Polymers, 13(6): 790-794
  13. Lee M.S., Kim S.Y., 2001. “Effects of initial structure on the deformation behavior of PP hollow fiber in continuous drawing”, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 81: 2170–2182
  14. De Rovere A., Grady B.P. and Shambaugh R.L., 2002. “The influence of processing parameters on the properties of melt-spun polypropylene hollow fibers”, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 83: 1759–1772
  15. Karaca E., Ozcelik F., 2007. “Influe