Journals / Balkan Medical Journal / 2012 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

Cognitive profile of inpatients

Yatarak tedavi gören hastalarda bilişsel profil

Pages
73–76
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

MMSE scores were orderly 18.7±2.3, 25.5±2.2 (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Cognitive deterioration has negative effects on the duration of a patient's hospital stay.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: One hundred-six hospitalized patients over 50 years of age were assessed between 01-15 February 2009.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:MMSE scores were orderly 18.7±2.3, 25.5±2.2 (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Cognitive deterioration has negative effects on the duration of a patient's hospital stay. Pre-recognition of patients' cogitive characterictics affects treatment success. We want to put forward the cognitive profiles of inpatients. Material and Methods: One hundred-six hospitalized patients over 50 years of age were assessed between 01-15 February 2009. Patients, not coooperative because of loss of consciousness and those who stayed in hospital because of primary cognitive disorder, have been excluded from study. At first evaluation, patients having cognitive deterioration hav2e been re-evalued at a dementia clinic and the patients'cognitive profile identified. Groups with or without cognitive deterioration were compared for demographic properties. Results: Fifty-seven (%53.7) of 106 patients took 24, under 24 score from MMSE. 30 patients (28.3%) of 106 had mild cognitive deficiency. 8 patients (7.5%) had primary dementia syndrome. When groups with and without cognitive deterioration were examined, there was no difference in gender and family history (p=0.48, p=0.58). The mean age of the group with cognitive deterioration was higher, but lower educational level (p=0.008, p=0.006). MMSE scores were orderly 18.7±2.3, 25.5±2.2 (p

Özet

Amaç: Bilişsel bozulma hastaların hastanede yatış sürelerini olumsuz etkilemektedir. Hastaların bilişsel özelliklerinin önceden tanınması, tedavi başarısını etkiler. Biz hastanemizde yatan hastaların kognitif profillerini ortaya koymak istedik. Gereç ve Yöntemler: 1-15 Şubat 2009 tarihleri arasında hastanemizde yatan 50 yaş ve üzeri 106 hasta bilişsel açıdan değerlendirildi. Koopere olamayacak kadar bilinç kaybı olanlar ve primer kognitif bozukluk nedeniyle hastanede yatan hastalar çalışmaya dahil edilmedi. İlk değerlendirmede bilişsel yıkım tespit edilen hastalar demans polikliniğinde tekrar değerlendirilerek hastaların kognitif profilleri saptandı. Kognitif yıkım olan ve olmayan gruplar demografik özellikleri açısından karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Yüz altı hastanın 57'si (%53.7) MMSE'den 24 ve altı puan aldı. 106 hastanın 30'unda (%28.3) kognitif bozukluk olduğu saptandı. Bunların 22'si (%20.8) hafif kognitif bozukluk, 8'i (%7.5) ise primer demans sendromu idi. Kognitif yıkım olan ve olmayan gruplar incelendiğinde; cinsiyet ve soygeçmiş açısından fark saptanmadı (p=0.48 ve p=0.58). Kognitif yıkım olan grubun yaş ortalaması daha yüksek ve eğitim düzeyi daha düşüktü (p=0.008 ve p=0.006). Grupların MMSE puanları sırasıyla 18.7±2.3 ve 25.5±2.2 idi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

YAMAN, M., ORUÇ, S., DEMİRBAŞ, H., COŞKUNER, T., ARSLAN, D. (2022). Cognitive profile of inpatients. Balkan Medical Journal, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 73–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/461678

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Gürvit İH, Baran B. Demanslar ve Kognitif Bozukluklarda Ölçekler. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi 2007;44:58-65
  2. Gelder M, Gath D, Mayou R, Cowen P (1996) Oxford Textbook of Psychiatry. 3. baskı, Oxford University Press, s.510
  3. Kaplan Hİ, Sadock BJ(1998) Synopsis of Psychiatry- Behavioral Science & Clinical Psychiatry. 8. bask›, Mass Publishing, s.328
  4. Guijarro R, Roman C, Huelgas G, Villalobos A, Martin M, Guil M, et al. Impact of dementia on hospitalization. Neuroepidemiology 2010;35:101-8. [CrossRef] 5. Lyketsos CG, Sheppard JM, Rabins PV. Dementia in elderly persons in a general hospital. Am J Psychiatry 2000;157:704-7. [CrossRef] 6. Maslow K, Mezey, M. Recognition of dementia in hospitilized older adults. Am J Nurs 2008;108:40-9. [CrossRef] 7. Ganzer CA. Assessing Alzheimer’s disease and dementia: best practices nursing care. Geriatr Nurs 2007;28:358-65. [CrossRef] 8. Folstein MF, Folstein S, Mc Hugh PR. “Mini Mental State” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189-98. [CrossRef] 9. Gönen S, Küçükgüçlü Ö, Yener G. Hastanede Yatan Yaşlı Bireylerde Demansla İlişkili Olabilecek İşlevsel-Bilişsel Bozukluk Sıklığının İncelenmesi. J Neurol Sci Turk 2010;27;446-56
  5. Petersen RC, Roberts RO, Knopman DS, Boeve BF, Geda YE, Ivnik RJ, et al. Mild cognitive impairment: ten years later. Arch Neurol 2009;66:1447-55. [CrossRef] 11. Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, Kokmen E. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol 1999;56:303-8. [CrossRef] 12. Douzenis A, Michopoulos I, Gournellis R, Christodoulou C, Kalkavoura C, Michalopoulou PG, et al. Cognitive decline and dementia in elderly medical inpatients remain underestimated and underdiagnosed in a recently established university general hospital in Greece. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2010;50:147-50. [CrossRef] 13. Naylor MD, Stephens C, Bowles KH, Bixby MB. Cognitively impaired older adults: from hospital to home. Am J Nurs 2005;105:52-61. [CrossRef] 14. Arslantaş D, Özbabalık D, Metintaş S, Özkan S, Kalyoncu C, Özdemir G, et al. Prevalence of dementia and associated risk factors in Middle Anatolia, Turkey. J Clin Neurosci 2009;16:1455-9. [CrossRef] 15. Ferri CP, Prince M, Brayne C, Brodaty H, Fratiglioni L, Ganguli M, et al. Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study. Lancet 2005;366:2112-7. [CrossRef] 16. Gurvit H, Emre M, Tinaz S, Bilgic B, Hanagasi H, Sahin H, et al. The preval