Journals / Balkan Medical Journal / 2014 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

Epidemiology of Tularemia

Pages
3–10
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Because tickscancarry thebacteria bybothtransovarial andtransstadial transmission, theyplaya roleinthelifecycle of tularemia as both reservoir and vector.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Tularemia is considered to haveexisted in Anatolia forseveral thou-sandyears.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thecausative agent of tularemia mayhavefirstbeenusedasa biological weapon in 1320-1318 BC.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Because tickscancarry thebacteria bybothtransovarial andtransstadial transmission, theyplaya roleinthelifecycle of tularemia as both reservoir and vector.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001-2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Tularemia is considered to haveexisted in Anatolia forseveral thou-sandyears. There aresuspicions regarding itsusein biological war-farein theNeshite-Arzawan conflict. Thecausative agent of tularemia mayhavefirstbeenusedasa biological weapon in 1320-1318 BC. Thedisease hasrecently become a significant re-emerging disease globally as wellas in Turkey. In theperiod of 2001-2010, Kosovo had thehighest annual incidence in Europe at a rateof5.2per100,000. Sweden, Finland, Slovakia, Czech Republic, Norway, Serbia-Mon-tenegro, Hungary, Bulgaria, andCroatia follow withrates of2.80, 1.19, 1.0,0.81, 0.42, 0.4,0.36, 0.21, and0.15per100,000 people, respectively. Tularemia inTurkey wasfirstreported inthesoldiers living in theregion veryclose to theKaynarca Stream ofThrace in 1936. It hasstarted to gainmore andmore importance, especially in recent decades in Turkey, dueto a veryhighnumber of cases andits spread throughout thecountry. A totalof 431tularemia cases werere-corded in Turkey in 2005, buta significant reduction wasobserved in thenumber of thecases in thenextthreeyears; thenumber of patients decreased to 71in 2008. Thenumber of cases increased again in 2009 andcontinued in subsequent years. Thenumber of cases reached 428, 1531, 2151, and607in 2009, 2010, 2011, and2012, respectively. The number ofcases peaked in2011 inTurkey, andwasinfacthigher thanthetotalnumber ofcases in allEuropean Union countries. The number of cases is higher in females thanmales in Turkey. In Turkey, 52%of cases of tularemia diagnoses occur fromDecember to March andthemostcommon clinical presentation is theoropharyngeal form caused bycontaminated water. Rodents arethemostlikely sources of tularemia outbreaks in Turkey as wellas in Kosovo. Organisms such as ticks, fliesandmosquitoes arevectors of tularemia transmission to mammals. Because tickscancarry thebacteria bybothtransovarial andtransstadial transmission, theyplaya roleinthelifecycle of tularemia as both reservoir and vector.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜRCAN, Ş. (2022). Epidemiology of Tularemia. Balkan Medical Journal, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 3–10. https://ajindex.com/articles/461451

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Lindquist D, Chu MC, Probert WS. Francisella and Brucella (Translat-ed By: Çetinkaya Z.) In: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Jorgensen JH, Landry ML, Pfaller MA (Eds.). (Translation Editors: Başustaoğlu A, Kubar A, Yıldıran ŞT, Tanyüksel M.) Manual of Clinical Microbiology (Clini-cal Microbiology). 9.edition. Washington: ASM pres (Ankara Atlas Yayıncılık): 2009. p.815-24
  2. Ellis J, Oyston PC, Green M, Titball RW. Tularemia. Clin Microbiol Rev2002;15:631-46. [CrossRef] 3. Pınar A. Biyolojik Silah Olarak Mikroorganizmalar. Hacettepe Tıp Der-gisi 2010;41:97-104
  3. Hodges L, Penn RL. Tularemia and Bioterrorism. In: Fong and Alibek (Eds.). Bioterrorism and Infectious Agents. New York: Springer Science Business Media; 2005. p.71-98
  4. Gürcan Ş. Francisella tularensis ve Türkiye'de Tularemi. Mikrobiyol Bul2007;41:621-36
  5. Tularemi Hastalığının Kontrolü İçin Saha Rehberi. Temel Sağlık Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü Zoonotik Hastalıklar Daire Başkanlığı. Ankara: Başak Matbaacılık; 2011. p.1-18
  6. Plevnelioğlu KH. Memleketimizde tularemi. Tedavi Kliniği ve Laboratuvarı Dergisi 1936;6:119-35
  7. Özdemir D. Salgınların Ekonomik ve Sosyal Etkileri. In: Gürcan Ş (Ed.) Francisella tularensis ve Tularemi. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri; 2009. p.133-5
  8. Trevisanato SI. The "Hittite plague", an epidemic of tularemia and the first record of biological warfare. Med Hypotheses 2007;69:1371-4. [CrossRef] 10. Trevisanato SI. Did an epidemic of tularemia in Ancient Egypt affect the course of world history? Med Hypotheses 2004;63:905-10. [CrossRef] 11. Eliasson H, Broman T, Forsman M, Bäck E. Tularemia: Current Epidemiologyand Disease Management. Inf Dis Clin N Am 2006;20:289-311. [CrossRef] 12. Sjöstedt A. Tularemia: history, epidemiology, pathogen physiology, and clinical manifestations. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007;1105:1-29. [CrossRef] 13. Keim P, Johansson A, Wagner DM. Molecular Epidemiology, Evolution,and Ecology of Francisella. Ann N Y Acad Sci2007;1105:30-66. [CrossRef] 14. Kılıç S. A General Overview of Francisella tularensis and the Epidemi-ology of Tularemia in Turkey. Flora 2010;15:37-58
  9. Francisella. In: Forbes BA, Sahm DF, Weissfeld AS (Eds.) Bailey&Scott'sDiagnostic Microbiology. 12th ed. Missouri: Mosby Elsevier; 2007. p.440-3
  10. Mikalsen J, Olsen AB, Tengs T, Colquhoun DJ. Francisella philomiragiasubsp. noatunensis subsp. nov., Isolated From Farmed Atlantic Cod (Go-dus morhua L.) Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007;57:1960-5. [CrossRef] 17. Ottem KF, Nylund A, Karlsbakk