Journals / Balkan Medical Journal / 2015 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1

The effects of ankaferd blood stopper on the recovery process in an experimental oesophageal perforation model

Pages
96–100
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Topical ABS application on the repaired experimental oesophageal perforation regions led to positive wound-healing effects compared with the rats that were administered the primary repair alone.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Oesophageal perforation is a life-threatening pathology that is generally treated conservatively; however, surgical procedures are frequently performed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The experimental rats were classified into 6 groups (with 7 rats in each group).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Topical ABS application on the repaired experimental oesophageal perforation regions led to positive wound-healing effects compared with the rats that were administered the primary repair alone.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: Oesophageal perforation is a life-threatening pathology that is generally treated conservatively; however, surgical procedures are frequently performed. A topical haemostatic agent, Ankaferd Blood Stopper (ABS), also has beneficial wound-healing effects. Aims: This study aimed to determine the effects of ABS following experimental oesophageal perforations. Study Design: Animal experiment. Methods: The experimental rats were classified into 6 groups (with 7 rats in each group). Pairs of groups (primary repair alone and primary repair + ABS) were terminated in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd weeks following injury. The oesophageal perforations, which were 8-10 mm in length, were created using a nasogastric tube. The perforation sites were repaired with a 6-0 polyglactine thread in the primary repair groups. Additionally, ABS was sprayed over the perforation site in the treatment groups. Each oesophagus was evaluated histopathologically. Results: There were fewer microabscesses and areas of necrosis in the ABS groups compared with the primary repair groups. The histopathological evaluation revealed that the ABS groups had less inflammation and more re-epithelisation compared to the primary repair groups (p=0.002 and p=0.003, respectively). Fibrosis in the ABS groups was moderate in the 2nd week and mild in the 3rd week. Comparing the groups with respect to the time intervals, only the 1st week groups showed a significant difference in terms of re-epithelialisation (p=0.044). Conclusion: Topical ABS application on the repaired experimental oesophageal perforation regions led to positive wound-healing effects compared with the rats that were administered the primary repair alone.

🔖

Cite This Article

BORAN, Ç., KAHRAMANSOY, N., BOZTAŞ, G., KORKMAZ, T., KILIÇGÜN, A., GÜRBÜZ, N. S. (2022). The effects of ankaferd blood stopper on the recovery process in an experimental oesophageal perforation model. Balkan Medical Journal, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1, 96–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/461405

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Wu JT, Mattox KL, Wall MJ Jr. Esophageal perforations: new perspectives and treatment paradigms. J Trauma 2007
  2. [CrossRef] 2.Kuppusamy MK, Hubka M, Felisky CD, Carrott P, Kline EM, Koehler RP, et al. Evolving management strategies in esopha- geal perforation: surgeons using nonoperative techniques to im- prove outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 2011
  3. [CrossRef] 3.Okten I, Cangir AK, Ozdemir N, Kavukçu S, Akay H, Yavu- zer S. Management of esophageal perforation. Surg Today 2001
  4. [CrossRef] 4.Eroglu A, Turkyilmaz A, Aydin Y, Yekeler E, Karaoglanoglu N. Current management of esophageal perforation: 20 years experi- ence. Dis Esophagus 2009
  5. [CrossRef] 5.Martinez L, Rivas S, Hernández F, Avila LF, Lassaletta L, Mur- cia J, et al. Aggressive conservative treatment of esophageal per- forations in children. J Pediatr Surg 2003
  6. [CrossRef] 6.Sepesi B, Raymond DP, Peters JH. Esophageal perforation: surgical, endoscopic and medical management strategies. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2010
  7. [CrossRef] 7.Erdogan A, Gurses G, Keskin H, Demircan A. The sealing ef- fect of a fibrin tissue patch on the esophageal perforation area in primary repair. World J Surg 2007
  8. [CrossRef] 8.Demirbag S, Tiryaki T, Atabek C, Surer I, Ozturk H, Cetinkur- sun S. Conservative approach to the mediastinitis in child- hood secondary to esophageal perforation. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2005
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Goker H, Haznedaroglu IC, Ercetin S, Kirazli S, Akman U, Oz- turk Y, et al. Haemostatic actions of the folkloric medicinal plant extract Ankaferd Blood Stopper. J Int Med Res 2008
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Bilgili H, Kosar A, Kurt M, Onal IK, Goker H, Captug O, et al. Hemostatic efficacy of Ankaferd Blood Stopper in a swine bleeding model. Med Princ Pract 2009
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Tasdelen Fisgin N, Tanriverdi Cayci Y, Coban AY, Ozatli D, Tan- yel E, Durupinar B, et al. Antimicrobial activity of plant extract Ankaferd Blood Stopper. Fitoterapia 2009
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Saribas Z, Sener B, Haznedaroglu IC, Hascelik G, Kirazli Ş, Goker H. Antimicrobial activity of Ankaferd Blood Stop- per against nosocomial bacterial pathogens. Cent Eur J Med 2010
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Nageris BI, Zilker Z, Zilker M, Kariv N, Feinmesser R, Katzir A. Esophageal incisions repair by CO2 laser soldering. Otolar- yngol Head Neck Surg 2004
  14. [CrossRef] 14. Akbal E, Köklü S, Karaca G, Astarci HM, Koçak E, Taş A, et al. Beneficial e