Predatory Publishing and Turkey

References (7)

1. Tenopir C, King DW. Towards Electronic Journals: Realities for Scientists, Librarians, and Publishers.
2. Washington, DC: SLA Publishing; 2000.
3. Carlin L. (2017). Delta Think Releases Updated Open Access Market Sizing Analysis. DeltaThink (blog). Retrieved from https://deltathink.com/delta-think-releases-updated-openaccess-market-sizing-analysis/ Beall J. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature 2012;489:179. Bohannon J. Who’s afraid of peer review? Science 2013;342:60-5.
4. Sorokowski P, Kulczycki E, Sorokowska A, Pisanski K. Predatory journals recruit fake editor. Nature 2017;543:481-3.
5. Xia J, Harmon JL, Connolly KG, Donnelly RM, Anderson MR, Howard HA. Who publishes in ‘predatory’ journals? J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 2015;66:1406-17. Demir SB. Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why? Journal of Informetrics 2018;12:1296-1311.
6. Akça S, Akbulut M. Predatory journals in Turkey: An investigation through beall list. Bilgi Dünyası 2018;19:255-74. Demir SB. Pros and cons of the new financial support policy for Turkish researchers. Scientometrics 2018:116:2053-68. Erdağ TK. Are We as Otorhinolaryngologists Aware of the Danger of Predatory Journals? Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;55:95-8.
7. McCann TV, Polacsek M. False gold: Safely navigating open access publishing to avoid predatory publishers and journals. J Adv Nurs 2018;74:809-17. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2019/04/court-rules-ftcs-favor-against-predatory-academic-publisher-omics (Accessed June 9, 2019).