Journals / Balkan Medical Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 6

Optimal Endoscopic Management of Anastomotic Strictures After DoubleBiliary Reconstruction in Right Lobe Living-Donor Liver Transplantation

Pages
348–356
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, for patients in whom bilateral drainage is not possible, unilateral drainage may be recommended, with the placement of a maximum number of stents following primary biliary balloon dilatation, depending on the degree of stricture.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: There is no consensus on the optimal drainage technique in the management of biliary anastomotic strictures occurring after right-lobe living-donor liver transplantation (RL LDLT).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Study Design: Retrospective Cohort Methods: Between January 2009 and August 2019, 1693 patients underwent RL LDLT.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, for patients in whom bilateral drainage is not possible, unilateral drainage may be recommended, with the placement of a maximum number of stents following primary biliary balloon dilatation, depending on the degree of stricture.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: There is no consensus on the optimal drainage technique in the management of biliary anastomotic strictures occurring after right-lobe living-donor liver transplantation (RL LDLT). Aims: To investigate whether there is a superiority between unilateral and bilateral drainage groups in terms of efficacy and safety of biliary drainage in RL LDLT patients undergoing double-biliary reconstruction. Study Design: Retrospective Cohort Methods: Between January 2009 and August 2019, 1693 patients underwent RL LDLT. Of these, 182 patients who developed biliary anastomotic strictures out of the 306 patients who had double-biliary reconstruction, were included in the study. One hundred fifty-five patients with technical success were divided into 2 groups as unilateral (n=116) and bilateral (n=39) drainage groups. The groups were compared in terms of variable parameters such as clinical success, additional procedure, post-ERCP complication, procedures after clinical failure, hospital stay, mortality, and survival. Results: The clinical success was higher in the bilateral group (70% vs. 82%, P = .201). In the initial and the follow-up periods, a total of 44 (38%) patients in the unilateral group were switched to the bilateral drainage group due to the increased need for stenting. The placement of a stent successfully solved the problem only in 28% (32/117) of the patients in the unilateral group, while this rate was 44% (17/39) in the bilateral group. The median follow-up time of both groups was 42 months, and was equal. The number of stent-free follow-up patients in the unilateral drainage group was less than that in the bilateral drainage group (4 and 7, respectively). Conclusion: An active attempt should be made for bilateral drainage in patients with biliary anastomotic stricture following RL LDLT. However, for patients in whom bilateral drainage is not possible, unilateral drainage may be recommended, with the placement of a maximum number of stents following primary biliary balloon dilatation, depending on the degree of stricture.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARICI, K. B., YILMAZ, S., ÇAĞIN, Y. F., ARSLAN, A. K., YILDIRIM, O., ERDOĞAN, M. A., BİLGİÇ, Y., SAĞLAM, O. (2022). Optimal Endoscopic Management of Anastomotic Strictures After DoubleBiliary Reconstruction in Right Lobe Living-Donor Liver Transplantation. Balkan Medical Journal, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 6, 348–356. https://ajindex.com/articles/460853

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Shukla A, Vadeyar H, Rela M, Shah S. Liver transplantation: East versus West. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2013
  2. 3(3):243-253. [CrossRef] 2. Berg CL, Gillespie BW, Merion RM, et al. Improvement in survival associated with adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation. Gastroenterology. 2007
  3. 133(6):1806- 1813. [CrossRef] 3. Malagó M, Rogiers X, Broelsch CE. Liver splitting and living donor techniques. Br Med Bull. 1997
  4. 53(4):860-867. [CrossRef] 4. Northup PG, Abecassis MM, Englesbe MJ, et al. Addition of adult‐to‐adult living donation to liver transplant programs improves survival but at an increased cost. Liver Transpl. 2009
  5. 15(2):148-162. [CrossRef] 5. Pomfret EA, Fryer JP, Sima CS, Lake JR, Merion RM. Liver and intestine transplantation in the United States, 1996-2005. Am J Transplant. 2007
  6. 7(5 Pt 2):1376-1389. [CrossRef] 6. Hwang S, Lee SG, Sung KB, et al. Long‐term incidence, risk factors, and management of biliary complications after adult living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2006
  7. 12(5):831-838. [CrossRef] 7. Liu CL, Lo CM, Chan SC, Fan ST. Safety of duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction in right-lobe live-donor liver transplantation without biliary drainage. Transplantation. 2004
  8. 77(5):726-732. [CrossRef] 8. Santosh Kumar KY, Mathew JS, Balakrishnan D, et al. Intraductal transanastomotic stenting in duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction after living-donor liver transplantation: a randomized trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2017
  9. 225(6):747-754. [CrossRef] 9. Scanga AE, Kowdley KV. Management of biliary complications following orthotopic liver transplantation. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2007
  10. 9(1):31-38. [CrossRef] 10. Thuluvath PJ, Atassi T, Lee J. An endoscopic approach to biliary complications following orthotopic liver transplantation. Liver Int. 2003
  11. 23(3):156-162. [CrossRef] 11. Sharma S, Gurakar A, Jabbour N. Biliary strictures following liver transplantation: past, present and preventive strategies. Liver Transpl. 2008
  12. 14(6):759-769. [CrossRef] 12. Kim ES, Lee BJ, Won JY, Choi JY, Lee DK. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage may serve as a successful rescue procedure in failed cases of endoscopic therapy for a post–living-donor liver transplantation biliary stricture. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009
  13. 69(1):38-46. [CrossRef] 13. Kato H, Kawamoto H, Tsutsumi K, et al. Long‐term outcomes of endoscopic management for biliary strictures after living-donor liver transplantation with duct‐to‐duct reconstruction. Transpl Int. 2009
  14. 22(9):914-921. [CrossRef] 14.