Journals / Balkan Medical Journal / 2022 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 3

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and Neutralizing Antibody Levels in Patients with Past COVID-19 Infection: A Longitudinal Study

Pages
172–177
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Due to the limited information on seroconversion, comprehensive studies should be conducted for long-term follow-up of the immune response against SARS-CoV-2.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Monitoring the longevity of immunoglobulin G (IgG) responses following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections is vital to understanding the role of antibodies in preventing infection.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Aims: To determine the quantitative IgG responses specific to the Spike-S1 (S1) receptor-binding domain (S1/RBD) region of the virus in serum samples taken between 4 weeks and 7 months after polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positivity in patients who are diagnosed with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Due to the limited information on seroconversion, comprehensive studies should be conducted for long-term follow-up of the immune response against SARS-CoV-2.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: Monitoring the longevity of immunoglobulin G (IgG) responses following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections is vital to understanding the role of antibodies in preventing infection. Aims: To determine the quantitative IgG responses specific to the Spike-S1 (S1) receptor-binding domain (S1/RBD) region of the virus in serum samples taken between 4 weeks and 7 months after polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positivity in patients who are diagnosed with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Study Design: A longitudinal study. Methods: This study included 113 patients with a clinical and molecular diagnosis of COVID-19. The first and second serum samples were taken 1 and 7 months, respectively, after the PCR positivity. S1/ RBD-specific IgG antibody response was assayed using anti-SARS- CoV-2 QuantiVac ELISA (IgG) kit (Euroimmun, Lübeck, Germany). The neutralizing antibodies were investigated in 57 patients whose IgG test results were above the cut-off value. Results: In 57 patients with SARS-CoV-2 IgG, the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG quantitative antibody levels significantly decreased after 7 months (Z = −2.197, p = 0.028). A correlation was detected between the anti- SARS-CoV-2 IgG and nAb percent inhibition (IH%) levels detected in 1 month (rs = 0.496, p 6 months). Due to the limited information on seroconversion, comprehensive studies should be conducted for long-term follow-up of the immune response against SARS-CoV-2.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİNÇ, H. Ö., DEMİRCİ, M., ÖZDEMİR, Y. E., SİREKBASAN, S., AKTAŞ, A. N., TOK, Y. T., ÖZBEY, D., AKÇİN, R., GAREAYAGHİ, N., KUŞKUCU, M. A., MİDİLLİ, K., AYGÜN, G., SARIBAŞ, S., KOCAZEYBEK, B. (2022). Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and Neutralizing Antibody Levels in Patients with Past COVID-19 Infection: A Longitudinal Study. Balkan Medical Journal, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 3, 172–177. https://ajindex.com/articles/460763

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Word Health Organization (WHO). Coronavirus disease (COVID-2019) situation reports. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/ situation-reports [CrossRef] 2. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, et al. A novel Coronavirus from Patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020
  2. [CrossRef] 3. Zhao J, Yuan Q, Wang H, et al. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients of novel coronavirus disease 2019. Clin Infect Dis. 2020
  3. [CrossRef] 4. Liu L, Wang P, Nair MS, et al. Potent neutralizing antibodies against multiple epitopes on SARS-CoV-2 spike. Nature. 2020
  4. [CrossRef] 5. Bhimraj A, Morgan RL, Shumaker AH, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Treatment and Management of Patients with COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis. 2020
  5. ciaa478. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa478. Online ahead of print. [CrossRef] 6. Muecksch F, Wise H, Batchelor B, et al. Longitudinal Serological Analysis and Neutralizing Antibody Levels in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Convalescent Patients. J Infect Dis. 2021
  6. [CrossRef] 7. Legros V, Denolly S, Vogrig M, et al. A longitudinal study of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients reveals a high correlation between neutralizing antibodies and COVID-19 severity. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021
  7. [CrossRef] 8. McKeigue PM, Weir A, Bishop J, et al. Rapid Epidemiological Analysis of Comorbidities and Treatments as risk factors for COVID-19 in Scotland (REACT- SCOT): A population-based case-control study. PLoS Med. 2020
  8. e1003374. [CrossRef] 9. Romero Starke K, Petereit-Haack G, Schubert M, et al. The Age-Related Risk of Severe Outcomes Due to COVID-19 Infection: A Rapid Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020
  9. [CrossRef] 10. Ali N. Elevated level of C-reactive protein may be an early marker to predict risk for severity of COVID-19. J Med Virol. 2020
  10. [CrossRef] 11. Lu C, Liu Y, Chen B, et al. Prognostic value of lymphocyte count in severe COVID-19 patients with corticosteroid treatment. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021
  11. [CrossRef] 12. Yamasaki Y, Ooka S, Tsuchida T, et al. The peripheral lymphocyte count as a predictor of severe COVID-19 and the effect of treatment with ciclesonide. Virus Res. 2020
  12. 198089. [CrossRef] 13. Wang Y, Zhang L, Sang L, et al. Kinetics of viral load and antibody response in relation to COVID-19 severity. J Clin Invest. 2020
  13. [CrossRef] 14. Zhang J, Lin H, Ye B, et al.