Journals / Balkan Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

LDPCC and OFDM based cooperative communication for wireless sensor networks

Pages
201–208
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Similarly, 10−5 bit error rate value is reached at 0.36 dB for the low density parity check coded orthogonal frequency division multiplexing over Rician fading environment in amplify-and-forward relay protocol and finally 10−5 bit error rate value is reached at −5.30 dB for low density parity check coded orthogonal frequency division multiplexing over Rician fading environment without relay protocols.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper investigates the low-density parity-check codes and orthogonal frequency division multiplexing technique effects on the relay assisted sensor networks.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the relay assisted case, the relay terminal operates in amplify-and-forward and decode-and-forward modes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Similarly, 10−5 bit error rate value is reached at 0.36 dB for the low density parity check coded orthogonal frequency division multiplexing over Rician fading environment in amplify-and-forward relay protocol and finally 10−5 bit error rate value is reached at −5.30 dB for low density parity check coded orthogonal frequency division multiplexing over Rician fading environment without relay protocols.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper investigates the low-density parity-check codes and orthogonal frequency division multiplexing technique effects on the relay assisted sensor networks. The investigation utilizes Rician and Rayleigh fading environments for the per-formance analysis. The investigation also considers two different types of information exchange processes, which are direct and relay assisted cases. In the relay assisted case, the relay terminal operates in amplify-and-forward and decode-and-forward modes. Monte-Carlo based computer simulations reveal that 10−5 bit error rate value is reached at 16.50 dB for low density parity check coded orthogonal frequency division multiplexing over Rician fading environment in decode-and-forward relay protocol. Similarly, 10−5 bit error rate value is reached at 0.36 dB for the low density parity check coded orthogonal frequency division multiplexing over Rician fading environment in amplify-and-forward relay protocol and finally 10−5 bit error rate value is reached at −5.30 dB for low density parity check coded orthogonal frequency division multiplexing over Rician fading environment without relay protocols.

🔖

Cite This Article

OZDURAN, V. (2022). LDPCC and OFDM based cooperative communication for wireless sensor networks. Balkan Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 201–208. https://ajindex.com/articles/460514

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. I. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, and E. Cayirci, “Wireless sensor networks: a survey,” Computer Networks, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 393 – 422, 2002
  2. A. Nosratinia, T. E. Hunter, and A. Hedayat, “Cooperative communication in wireless networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 74–80, Oct 2004
  3. M. Torabi, W. Ajib, and D. Haccoun, “Performance analysis of amplify-and-forward cooperative networks with relay selection over rayleigh fading channels,” in VTC Spring 2009 - IEEE 69th Vehicular Technology Conference, April 2009, pp. 1–5
  4. J. N. Laneman and G. W. Wornell, “Distributed space-time-coded protocols for exploiting cooperative diversity in wireless networks,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 2415–2425, Oct 2003
  5. S. Simoens, O. Munoz-Medina, J. Vidal, and A. Del Coso, “Compress-and-forward cooperative mimo relaying with full channel state information,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Pro-cessing, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 781–791, Feb 2010
  6. T. E. Hunter and A. Nosratinia, “Performance analysis of coded cooperation diversity,” in IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2003. ICC ’03., vol. 4, May 2003, pp. 2688– 2692 vol.4
  7. H. Chen, A. B. Gershman, and S. Shahbazpanahi, “Filter-and-forward distributed beamforming in relay networks with frequency selective fading,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Pro-cessing, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 1251–1262, March 2010
  8. Du Bing and Zhang Jun, “Design and optimization of joint network-channel ldpc code for wireless cooperative communi-cations,” in 2008 11th IEEE Singapore International Conference on Communication Systems, Nov 2008, pp. 1625–1629
  9. Weiguo Tang and Lei Wang, “Cooperative ofdm for energy-efficient wireless sensor networks,” in 2008 IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems, Oct 2008, pp. 77–82
  10. M. R. Islam and J. Kim, “Capacity and ber analysis for nakagami-n channel in ldpc coded wireless sensor network,” in 2008 International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing, Dec 2008, pp. 167–172
  11. D. S. Singh A.K., Mishra S.K., “Energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks: Cooperative mimo-ofdm,” Recent Trends in Communication, Computing, and Electronics. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol. 524, no. -, pp. 147–154, December 2018
  12. Shuguang Cui, A. J. Goldsmith, and A. Bahai, “Energy-efficiency of mimo and cooperative mimo techniques in sensor networks,” IEEE Journal on Selected A