Journals / Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon / 2018 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

MACBETH BASED TAGUCHI LOSS FUNCTIONS APPROACH FOR GREEN SUPPLIER SELECTION: A CASE STUDY IN TEXTILE INDUSTRY

YEŞİL TEDARİKÇİ SEÇİMİ İÇİN MACBETH TABANLI TAGUCHİ KAYIP FONKSİYONLARI YAKLAŞIMI: TEKSTİL ENDÜSTRİSİNDE BİR UYGULAMA

Pages
90–97
Publication Date
2018-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, the impacts of the changes on criteria weights have been investigated through sensitivity analysis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Due to the increasing concern towards environmental protection, companies have started to adapt environmentalist approaches with the aim of being perceived as green.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since suppliers have important effects on the performance of supply chains, it becomes more important to evaluate potential suppliers by considering environmental factors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, the impacts of the changes on criteria weights have been investigated through sensitivity analysis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yeşil tedarikçi seçimi · MACBETH · Taguchi kayıp fonksiyonları

Abstract

Due to the increasing concern towards environmental protection, companies have started to adapt environmentalist approaches with the aim of being perceived as green. However, this might not be enough in performing in a supply chain thus working with green partners is mandatory. Since suppliers have important effects on the performance of supply chains, it becomes more important to evaluate potential suppliers by considering environmental factors. This study proposes a novel integrated approach consisting of MACBETH and Taguchi loss functions for green supplier selection problem. The proposed approach determines the weights of criteria by using MACBETH in the first stage. These weights are used in Taguchi loss functions for ranking and selecting the best suppliers. A real case study from textile industry is presented to illustrate the applicability of the proposed methodology. Moreover, the impacts of the changes on criteria weights have been investigated through sensitivity analysis.

Özet

Çevreyi koruma bilincinin artması sebebiyle, firmalar yeşil olarak algılanmak amacıyla çevreci yaklaşımları benimsemeye başlamışlardır. Bunun yanı sıra tedarik zincirinde bu yaklaşım yeterli olmayabilir ve yeşil tedarikçilerle işbirliği yapmak zorunlu hale gelebilir. Tedarikçiler, tedarik zincirlerinin performansı üzerinde önemli etkiye sahip olduklarından, çevresel faktörleri göz önüne alarak potansiyel tedarikçilerin değerlendirilmesi daha da önem kazanmaktadır. Bu çalışma, yeşil tedarikçi seçimi problemi için MACBETH ve Taguchi kayıp fonksiyonlarından oluşan yeni bütünleşik bir yaklaşım önermektedir. Önerilen yaklaşımın ilk aşamasında kriterlerin ağırlıkları MACBETH yöntemiyle belirlenmektedir. Bu ağırlık değerleri, Taguchi kayıp fonksiyonlarında en iyi tedarikçilerin sıralanması ve seçiminde kullanılmaktadır. Önerilen yöntemin uygulanabilirliği tekstil endüstrisinde bir vaka çalışması ile sunulmuştur. Ayrıca kriter ağırlıklarındaki değişimlerin yarattığı etki duyarlılık analizi ile araştırılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖREN, H. G., ŞENOCAK, A. A. (2018). MACBETH BASED TAGUCHI LOSS FUNCTIONS APPROACH FOR GREEN SUPPLIER SELECTION: A CASE STUDY IN TEXTILE INDUSTRY. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 90–97. https://ajindex.com/articles/46018

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Srivastava S.K., 2007, “Green supply-chain management: A state-of-the-art literature review”, International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1): 53-80
  2. Ho W., Xu X. and Dey P.K., 2010, “Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review”, European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1): 16-24
  3. Govindan K., Sivakumar R., Sarkis J. and Murugesan P., 2015, “Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 98: 66-83
  4. Azadnia A.H., Saman M.Z.M. and Wong K.Y., 2015, “Sustainable supplier selection and order lot-sizing: an integrated multi-objective decision-making process”, International Journal of Production Research, 53(2): 383-408
  5. Chen C.C., Tseng M.L., Lin Y.H. and Lin Z.S., 2010, “Implementation of green supply chain management in uncertainty” In: IEEE International Conference on IEEM, Dec. 7-10, pp. 260-264
  6. Kannan D., Khodaverdi R., Olfat L., Jafarian A. and Diabat A., 2013, “Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi-objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 47: 355-367
  7. Kuo R.J., Wang Y.C. and Tien F.C., 2010, “Integration of artificial neural network and MADA methods for green supplier selection”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(12): 1161-1170
  8. Li X. and Zhao C., 2009, “Selection of suppliers of vehicle components based on green supply chain”, In: IEEE International Conference on IE&EM, 21-23-Oct, pp. 1588-1591
  9. Luthra S., Govindan K., Kannan D., Mangla S.K. and Garg C.P., 2016, “An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 140(3): 1686-1698
  10. Thongchattu C and Siripokapirom S (2010). Green supplier selection consensus by neural network. In: International Conference on ICMEE, IEEE 1-3 Aug,pp. 313-316
  11. Wen U.P. and Chi J.M., 2010, “Developing green supplier selection procedure: a DEA approach”, In: IEEE International Conference on IE&EM, 29-31 Oct, 79-74
  12. Yan G., 2009, “Research on green suppliers’ evaluation based on AHP & genetic algorithm”, In: IEEE International Conference on SPS, 15-17 May, pp. 615-619 13. Yazdani M., Zolfani S.H. and Zavadskas E.K., 2016, “New integration of MCDM methods and QFD in the selection of green suppliers”, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17