SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon / 2018 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3

SKIN-FABRIC FRICTION AND OTHER PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS OF SOCKS FABRICS PRODUCED FROM CELLULOSIC FIBERS

Sibel KAPLAN
Ceren KARAMAN
Pages
213–220
Publication Date
2018-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, cotton, 48/52% cotton/modal and Tencel® fabrics have higher bursting strength.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Skin friction and some performance characteristics of single jersey fabrics produced from cotton (combed, carded and rotor) and regenerated cellulosic fiber (viscose, bamboo, modal, micromodal, Tencel®, Tencel LF® and some blends) yarns were investigated by surface friction, bursting strength, abrasion and pilling resistance tests.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the results, cotton, 48/52% cotton/modal and Tencel® fabrics have higher bursting strength.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is thought that, results obtained for cotton and different regenerated cellulosic fabrics are valid also for all next-to-skin garments.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Skin friction · socks · fiber type

Abstract

Skin friction and some performance characteristics of single jersey fabrics produced from cotton (combed, carded and rotor) and regenerated cellulosic fiber (viscose, bamboo, modal, micromodal, Tencel®, Tencel LF® and some blends) yarns were investigated by surface friction, bursting strength, abrasion and pilling resistance tests. Daily or functional socks were the intended end use of the selected materials. According to the results, cotton, 48/52% cotton/modal and Tencel® fabrics have higher bursting strength. Pilling and abrasion resistances are the highest for also 48/52% cotton/modal fabric. For skin friction which is crucial for socks within shoes, rotor viscose, 48/52% cotton/modal and micromodal have smoother surfaces than modal and Tencel® for both kinetic and static friction coefficients. It means that these materials create less injuries on sweaty skin during an activity. It is thought that, results obtained for cotton and different regenerated cellulosic fabrics are valid also for all next-to-skin garments.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAPLAN, S., KARAMAN, C. (2018). SKIN-FABRIC FRICTION AND OTHER PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS OF SOCKS FABRICS PRODUCED FROM CELLULOSIC FIBERS. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3, 213–220. https://ajindex.com/articles/46013

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Bertaux, E., Derler, S., Rossi, R. M., Zeng, X., Koehl, L. And Ventenat, V., 2010, “Textile, Physiological and Sensorial Parameters in Sock Comfort”, Textile Research Journal, Vol: 80 (17), pp: 1803-1810
  2. Baussan, E., Bueno, M. A., Rossi, R. M. and Derler, S., 2010, Experiments and modelling of skin-knitted fabric friction“, Wear, Vol: 268(9),pp:1103-1110
  3. Gwosdow, A.R., Stevens, J.C., Berglund, L.G. and Stolwijk, J. A. J., 1986, “Skin Friction and Fabric Sensations in Neutral and Warm Environments”, Textile Research Journal, Vol: 56 (9), pp: 574-580
  4. Herring, K.M. and Richie Jr, D.H., 1990, “Friction blisters and sock fiber composition. A double-blind study”, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, Vol: 80 (2), pp: 63-71
  5. Tasron, D. N., Thurston, T. J., & Carré, M. J. 2015, Frictional behaviour of running sock textiles against plantar skin“, Procedia Engineering, Vol: 112, pp: 110-115
  6. Van Amber, R. R., Lowe, B. J., Niven, B. E., Laing, R. M., Wilson, C. A., & Collie, S., 2015. “The Effect of Fiber Type, Yarn Structure and Fabric Structure on the Frictional Characteristics of Sock Fabrics”, Textile Research Journal, Vol: 85(2), pp: 115-127
  7. Kenins, P., 1994, “Influence of Fiber Type and Moisture on Measured Fabric-to-Skin Friction”, Textile Research Journal, Vol: 64(12), pp: 722-728
  8. Baussan, E., Bueno, M. A., Rossi, R. M., & Derler, S. 2013, “Analysis of current running sock structures with regard to blister prevention“, Textile Research Journal, Vol:83(8), pp: 836-848
  9. Bogerd, C.P., Rechsteiner, I., Wüst, B., Rossi, R.M. and Brühwiler, P.A.,B.C. and Brühwiler, P.A., 2011, “The Effect of Two Sock Fabrics on Physiological Parameters Associated with Blister Incidence: A Laboratory Study“, Annual Occupational Hygiene, Vol: 55 (5), pp: 510-518
  10. Hes, L., Oglakcioğlu, N., Marmarali, A., Özdil, N., & Lima, M. 2008, “The Effect Of Moisture On Friction Coefficient Of Elastic Knitted Fabrics“, Journal of Textile & Apparel/Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, Vol: 18(3), pp: 206-210
  11. Werd, M. B., & Knight, E. L. 2010, “Athletic footwear and orthoses in sports medicine” P. R. Langer (Ed.), Springer, New York, pp: 98
  12. Badr, A. A., Hassanin, A., Moursey, M., 2016, “Influence of Tencel/cotton blends on knitted fabric performance”, Alexandria Engineering Journal, Vol: 55(3), pp: 24392447
  13. Erdumlu, N. and Ozipek, B., 2008, “Investigation of Regenerated Bamboo Fibre and Yarn Characteristics”, Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe