SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon / 2019 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

DEVELOPMENT OF TUBULAR WOVEN PREFORM REINFORCED COMPOSITE PIPE AND COMPARISON OF ITS COMPRESSION BEHAVIOR WITH FILAMENT WOUND COMPOSITE

Gülşah PAMUK
Uğur KEMİKLİOĞLU
Onur SAYMAN
Pages
262–267
Publication Date
2019-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The test results indicated that under transverse and axial compression, composite pipes developed in this study showed superior strength values than filament wound ones.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this research a novel preform for the reinforcement of tubular composite structures has been developed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The mentioned preform was woven from para aramid yarn in the tubular form.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The test results indicated that under transverse and axial compression, composite pipes developed in this study showed superior strength values than filament wound ones.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Industrial textiles · composites · filament winding

Abstract

In this research a novel preform for the reinforcement of tubular composite structures has been developed. The mentioned preform was woven from para aramid yarn in the tubular form. A mandrel was passed through a certain amount of tubular woven preform layer then impregnated with resin, cured in an oven and the resulting composite pipe was removed from the mandrel. By using the same para aramid yarn, filament wound composite pipes were also manufactured with the same production parameters. Axial and transverse compression behaviors of tubular woven preform reinforced composite pipes were compared with the ones that are manufactured by conventional filament winding method. The test results indicated that under transverse and axial compression, composite pipes developed in this study showed superior strength values than filament wound ones.

🔖

Cite This Article

PAMUK, G., KEMİKLİOĞLU, U., SAYMAN, O. (2019). DEVELOPMENT OF TUBULAR WOVEN PREFORM REINFORCED COMPOSITE PIPE AND COMPARISON OF ITS COMPRESSION BEHAVIOR WITH FILAMENT WOUND COMPOSITE. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 262–267. https://ajindex.com/articles/45976

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Hashmi MSJ, 2006. Aspects of tube and pipe manufacturing processes meter to nanometer diameter., Journal of Materials Processing Technology 179, 5-10
  2. Zou GP, Taheri F. 2006. Stress analysis of adhesively bonded sandwich pipe joints subjected to torsional loading. International Journal of Solids and Structures 43, 5953-5968
  3. Shen H, Wen J, Yu D, Wen X, 2009. The vibrational properties of a periodic composite pipe in 3D space. Journal of Sound and Vibration 328, 57-70
  4. Mertiny P, Ellyin F, Hothan A, 2004. An experimental investigation on the effect of multi angle filament winding on the strength of tubular composite structures. Composites Science and Technology 64, 1-9
  5. Use of Composite Pipe Materials in the Transportation of Natural Gas (2002) Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.165.1163&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed 12 march 2018)
  6. Sari M, Karakuzu R, Deniz ME, Icten BM. 2011, Residual failure pressures and fatigue life of filament wound composite pipes subjected to lateral impact. Journal of Composite Materials 46(15), 1787-1794
  7. Xia M, Kemmochi K, Takayanagi H. 2002. Bending behavior of filament-wound fiber-reinforced sandwich pipes. Composite Structures 56, 201-210
  8. Ma Y, Sugahara T, Yang Y, Hamada H. 2015. A study on the energy absorption properties of carbon/aramid fiber filament winding composite tube. Composite Structures 123, 301-311
  9. Xia M, Kemmochi K, Takayanagi H. 2001. Analysis of filament wound fiber reinforced sandwich pipe under combined internal pressure and thermomechanical loading. Composite Structures 51(3), 273-283
  10. Deniz ME, Karakuzu R. 2012. Seawater effect on impact behavior of glass epoxy composite pipes. Composites Part B 43(13), 1130-1138
  11. Onder A, Sayman O, Dogan T, Tarakcioglu N. 2009. Burst failure load of composite pressure vessels. Composite Structures 89(1), 159-166
  12. Sayman O. 2005. Analysis of multi-layered composite cylinders under hygrothermal loading. Composites Part A, 36(7), 923-933
  13. Demir I, Sayman O, Dogan A, Arikan V, Arman Y. 2015., The effects of repeated transverse impact load on the burst pressure of composite pressure vessel. Composites Part B 68, 121-125
  14. Deniz ME, Ozdemir O, Ozen M, Karakuzu R. 2013. Failure pressure and impact response of glass epoxy pipes exposed to seawater. Composites Part B 53, 355-361
  15. Cohen D. 1997. Influence of filament winding parameters on composite vessel quality and strength. Composites Part A 28(