AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightIn migraine patients with cutaneous allodynia, it is important to evaluate the severity of pain as well as sleep quality and psychological status and should be considered in terms of treatment planning.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Abstract
Aim: The aim of study was to compare pain severity, sleep quality and psychological status in patients with migraine with and without cutaneous allodynia. Materials and Methods: The study was planned as a case-controlled study. Thirty-two (32) patients with migraine were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups as with (16) and without (16) cutaneous allodynia according to the Allodynia Symptom Checklist. Pain intensity was assessed with Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Sleep quality was assessed with Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Psychological status was assessed with Hospital Anxiety (HAD-A) and Depression (HAD-D) Scale. Results: In the cutaneous allodynia group, 6(37.5%) patients had severe, 5(31.2%) patients had moderate, 5(31.2%) patients had mild cutaneous allodynia. In the control group, 1(6.2%) patient had mild, 10(62.5%) patients had moderate and 5(31.2%) patients had severe pain. In the cutaneous allodynia group, 8(50%) patients had moderate and 8(50%) patients had severe pain. It was observed that the VAS score (p:0.005), HAD-A score (p:0.034) and PSQI score (p:0.028) were higher in individuals with cutaneous allodynia. HAD-D score (p:0.089) was found to be similar in individuals with and without cutaneous allodynia. Conclusion: It was observed that migraine patients with cutaneous allodynia had higher pain severity and anxiety and impaired sleep quality compared to those without cutaneous allodynia. In migraine patients with cutaneous allodynia, it is important to evaluate the severity of pain as well as sleep quality and psychological status and should be considered in terms of treatment planning.
Özet
Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı, kutaneal allodinisi olan ve olmayan migren hastalarında ağrı şiddeti, uyku kalitesi ve psikolojik durumun karşılaştırılmasıydı. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışma olgu kontrol çalışma tipinde planlandı. Çalışmaya otuz iki (32) migren hastası dahil edildi. Hastalar Allodini Semptom Kontrol Listesine göre kutaneal allodinisi olan (16) ve olmayan (16) olmak üzere iki gruba ayrıldı. Ağrı şiddeti Görsel Analog Skalası (GAS) ile, uyku kalitesi Pittsburgh Uyku Kalitesi İndeksi (PUKİ) ile, psikolojik durum Hastane Anksiyete (HAD-A) ve Depresyon Ölçeği (HAD-D) ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Kuteneal allodini grubunda 6(%37.5) hasta ciddi, 5(%31.2) hasta orta, 5(%31.2) hasta hafif derecede kuteneal allodiniye sahipti. Kontrol grubunda 1(%6.2) hasta hafif, 10(%62.5) hasta orta, 5(%31.2) hasta ise ciddi şiddette ağrıya sahipti. Kutaneal allodini grubunda 8(%50) hasta orta ve 8(%50) hasta ciddi şiddette ağrıya sahipti. Kutaneal allodinisi olan bireylerin olmayanlara göre GAS skorunun (p:0.005), HAD-A skorunun (p:0.034) ve PUKİ skorunun (p:0.028) daha yüksek olduğu görüldü. Kutaneal allodinisi olan ve olmayan bireylerin HAD-D skorunun (p:0.089) benzer olduğu saptandı. Sonuç: Kuteneal allodinisi olan migren hastalarının kuteneal allodinisi olmayan migren hastalarına göre ağrı şiddetinin ve anksiyete düzeyinin daha yüksek olduğu ve uyku kalitesinin bozulduğu görüldü. Kuteneal allodinisi olan migren hastalarında ağrı şiddetinin yanında uyku kalitesi ve psikolojik durumun da değerlendirilmesi önemlidir ve tedavi planlanması açısından göz önünde bulundurulmalıdır.