Journals / Bağımlılık Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

The effects of individual locomotor activity difference on the nicotine sensitization in mice

Farelerde bireysel lokomotor aktivite farklılığının nikotin duyarlılaşmasına etkileri

Pages
62–66
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Nicotine-induced sensitization or dependence can be developed easier in mice with low LMA

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study the effects of individual differences in the locomotor activity (LMA) of mice on the development of nicotine-induced sensitization developed by repeated nicotine treatment was investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: At the beginning of the study, female Swiss -Webster mice were treated with saline for 4 days, daily.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Nicotine-induced sensitization or dependence can be developed easier in mice with low LMA
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In this study the effects of individual differences in the locomotor activity (LMA) of mice on the development of nicotine-induced sensitization developed by repeated nicotine treatment was investigated. Method: At the beginning of the study, female Swiss -Webster mice were treated with saline for 4 days, daily. They placed into the LMA cages and their LMAs re-corded for 30 min immediately after treatment. Mice were separated into groups with low LMA or high LMA, according to their activity scores on the 4th day. After habituation pro-cess, separated animals were treated wit h nicotine (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/kg, ip.) or saline, every second day for 19 days, to produce sensitization. The same procedure was also applied to the non-separated groups of mice.Results: The development of locomotor sensi-tization was tested separately in mice with low LMA and high LMA, and non-separated mice. High nicotine dose (2 mg/kg) was produced locomotor sensitization in all groups (low LMA, high LMA and non-separated groups). Low dose of nicotine (1 mg/kg) produced locomotor sensitization only in groups with low LMA. Conclusion: Individual LMA differences in mice may be an important factor in the development of nicotine-induced locomotor sensitization. Nicotine-induced sensitization or dependence can be developed easier in mice with low LMA

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, farelerin lokomotor aktivitesindeki (LMA) bireysel farklılığın tekrarlı nikotin uygulanması ile oluşturulan nikotin duyarlılaşmasına etkisi incelenmiştir. Yöntem: Çalışmanın başlangıcında, dişi Swiss-Webster farelere dört gün süre ile her gün salin uygulandı ve hemen LMA kafesi içine bırakılarak 30 dakika LMA'ları kaydedildi. Fareler 4. gündeki aktivite değerlerine göre düşük ve yüksek LMA'lı gruplara ayrıldı. Alışma işleminden sonra, ayrılan hayvanlarda duyarlılaşma oluşturmak için 19 gün süre ile iki günde bir nikotin (0.5-2 mg/kg) ve salin (kontrol) intraperitoneal yoldan uygulandı. Aynı işlemler ayrım yapılmamış gruplara da uygulandı. Bulgular: Lokomotor duyarlılaşma gelişimi, yüksek yada düşük LMA ayrımı yapılmayan ve yapılan gruplarda ayrı ayrı test edildi. Yüksek doz nikotin (2 mg/kg) tüm gruplarda (düşük ve yüksek LMA'lı ve ayrım yapılmayan gruplar) duya rlılaşma oluşturdu. Düşük doz nikotin (1 mg/kg) ise sadece düşük LMA'lı gruplarda duyarlılaşma oluşturdu, diğer gruplarda oluşturmadı. Sonuç: Farelerde bireysel LMA farklılıkları nikotine lokomotor duyarlılaşma gelişiminde önemli bir faktör olabilir. Düşük LMA'lı farelerde nikotine duyarlılaşma ve nikotin bağımlılığı daha kolay gelişebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYIR, H., ÇELİK, T. (2022). The effects of individual locomotor activity difference on the nicotine sensitization in mice. Bağımlılık Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 62–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/459189

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Domino EF. Nicotine induced behavioral locomotor sensitization. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiat 2001
  2. Robinson TE, Berridge KC. The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Rev 1993
  3. Steward J, Badiani A. Tolerance and sensitization to the behavioral effects of drugs. Behav Pharmacol 1993
  4. Berke JD, Hyman SE. Addiction, dopamine and the molecular mechanisms of memory. Neuron 2000
  5. Pierce RC, Kalivas PW. A circiutry model of the expression of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine-like psychostimulants. Brain Res Rev 1997
  6. Woolverton WL, Kleven MS. Multiple dopamine receptors and the behavioral effects of cocaine. NIDA Res Monogr 1988
  7. Reid MS, Fox L, Ho LB, Berger SP. Nicotine stimulation of extracellular glutamate levels in the nucleus accumbens: neuropharmacological characterization. Synapse 2000
  8. Birell CE, Balfour DJK. The influence of nicotine pretreatment on mesoaccumbens dopamine overflow and locomotor responses to d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacology 1998
  9. Hernandez PJ, Sadeghian K, Kelley AE. Early consolidation of instrumental learning requires protein synthesis in the nucleus accumbens. Nature Neurosci 2002
  10. Piazza PV, Deminière J-M, LeMoal M, Simone H. Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science 1989
  11. Robinson, TE, Berridge KC. The psychology and neurobiology of addiction: an incentive-sensitization view. Addiction 2000
  12. 95(Suppl. 2): 91-117.12- Browman KE, Badiani A, Robinson TE. The influence of environment on the induction of sensitization to the psychomotor activating effects of intravenous cocaine in rats is dose-dependent. Psychopharmacology 1998
  13. Miller DK, Wilkins LH, Bardo MT, et al. Once weekly administration of nicotine produces long-lasting locomotor sensitization in rats via a nicotinic receptor-mediated mechanism. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2001
  14. Robinson TE, Berridge KC. Mechanisms of action of addictive stimuli. Incentive-sensitization and addiction. Addiction 2001
  15. Kayir H, Uzbay IT. Investigation of a possible sensitization development to a challenge dose of ethanol after 2 weeks following the single injection in mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2002
  16. Vanderschuren LJMJ, Schmidt ED, De Vries TJ, et al. A single expo