Journals / Bağcılar Tıp Bülteni / 2019 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4

Management with Guidance of Minimally Invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring (PiCCO®) in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and Postoperative Results

Koroner Arter Bypass Cerrahisinde Minimal İnvaziv Kalp Debisi Ölçüm (PICCO®) Kılavuzluğu ile Yönetim ve Postoperatif Sonuçlar

Pages
86–92
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The patients’demographic characteristics (age, sex, weight, height, body mass index),American Society of Anesthesiologists physical conditions, comorbidities,ejection fractions, anesthetic management, operative details, hemodynamicdata, PiCCO® parameters, extubation times, cardiovascular surgery ICUlengths of stay, requirements for vasoactive agent and blood transfusion,mortality, and morbidity were recorded from patient records and evaluatedthe correlation between the measured PiCCO® parameters and extubationtime and ICU length of stay inpatients.Results: A significant increase was detected in the parameters of cardiaccontractility and performance monitored with PiCCO® in the postoperativeperiod (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Our study aimed to assess the correlation between themeasured PiCCO® parameters and extubation time and intensive careunit (ICU) length of stay in patients who underwent coronary arterybypass grafting (CABG) surgery and were managed by monitorization ofcardiac output and cardiac performance parameters with PiCCO®.Method: This study was conducted by retrospective analysis data of all44 patients who underwent CABG surgery during December 2015-March2016 and were managed through PiCCO® monitorization.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Objective: Our study aimed to assess the correlation between themeasured PiCCO® parameters and extubation time and intensive careunit (ICU) length of stay in patients who underwent coronary arterybypass grafting (CABG) surgery and were managed by monitorization ofcardiac output and cardiac performance parameters with PiCCO®.Method: This study was conducted by retrospective analysis data of all44 patients who underwent CABG surgery during December 2015-March2016 and were managed through PiCCO® monitorization.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The patients’demographic characteristics (age, sex, weight, height, body mass index),American Society of Anesthesiologists physical conditions, comorbidities,ejection fractions, anesthetic management, operative details, hemodynamicdata, PiCCO® parameters, extubation times, cardiovascular surgery ICUlengths of stay, requirements for vasoactive agent and blood transfusion,mortality, and morbidity were recorded from patient records and evaluatedthe correlation between the measured PiCCO® parameters and extubationtime and ICU length of stay inpatients.Results: A significant increase was detected in the parameters of cardiaccontractility and performance monitored with PiCCO® in the postoperativeperiod (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Our study aimed to assess the correlation between themeasured PiCCO® parameters and extubation time and intensive careunit (ICU) length of stay in patients who underwent coronary arterybypass grafting (CABG) surgery and were managed by monitorization ofcardiac output and cardiac performance parameters with PiCCO®.Method: This study was conducted by retrospective analysis data of all44 patients who underwent CABG surgery during December 2015-March2016 and were managed through PiCCO® monitorization. The patients’demographic characteristics (age, sex, weight, height, body mass index),American Society of Anesthesiologists physical conditions, comorbidities,ejection fractions, anesthetic management, operative details, hemodynamicdata, PiCCO® parameters, extubation times, cardiovascular surgery ICUlengths of stay, requirements for vasoactive agent and blood transfusion,mortality, and morbidity were recorded from patient records and evaluatedthe correlation between the measured PiCCO® parameters and extubationtime and ICU length of stay inpatients.Results: A significant increase was detected in the parameters of cardiaccontractility and performance monitored with PiCCO® in the postoperativeperiod (p

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızda; koroner arter bypass greftleme cerrahisi (KABG) geçiren ve PİCCO® ile sürekli kalp debisi ve kardiyak performans paremetreleri monitörize edilerek yönetilen hastalarda, ölçülen PİCCO® parametreleri ile ekstübasyon ve yoğun bakım ünitesi (YBÜ) kalış süreleri arasındaki korelasyon değerlendirildi. Yöntem: Bu çalışma, Aralık 2015-Mart 2016 tarihleri arasında KABG cerrahisi geçiren ve PİCCO® monitorizasyonu ile yönetilen 44 olgunun kayıtlarının retrospektif incelenmesi ile yapıldı. Hastaların demografik özellikleri (yaş, cinsiyet, kilo, boy, vücut kitle indeksi), Amerikan anestezi derneği fiziksel durumları, eşlik eden hastalıklar, ejeksiyon fraksiyonları, anestezi yönetimi, operasyon bilgileri, hemodinamik veriler, PİCCO® paremetreleri, ekstübasyon süreleri, kardiyovasküler cerrahi YBÜ kalış süreleri, vazoaktif ajan ve kan transfüzyonu gereksinimleri, mortalite ve morbidite durumları kaydedildi ve ölçülen PİCCO® parametreleri ile ekstübasyon ve YBÜ kalış süreleri arasındaki korelasyon değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Postoperatif dönemde PİCCO® ile değerlendirilen kardiyak kontraktilite ve performansı gösteren parametrelerin anlamlı şekilde arttığı tespit edildi (p0,05) Sonuç: PICCO® kılavuzluğu ile yönettiğimiz koroner revaskülarizasyon olgularında, miyokardiyal kontraktilitenin ve kardiyak performansın iyileştiği, hastaların ekstübasyon ve yoğun bakım kalış sürelerinde beklenenin dışında bir uzama olmadığı gösterilmiş olup, kardiyak fonksiyon paremetreleri takip edilerek yönetilen hastalarda optimum volüm ve hemodinamik hedeflerin sağlanabileceğini düşünüyoruz.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRGAN, S., ERKALP, K., SELCAN, A., ÖZCAN, F. G., BOSTAN, G., ÖZALP, A. (2022). Management with Guidance of Minimally Invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring (PiCCO®) in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and Postoperative Results. Bağcılar Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4, 86–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/459000

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Engelman D, Ali WB, Williams JB, Perrault LP, Reddy VS, Arora RC, et al. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Cardiac Surgery Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society Recommendations. JAMA Surg 2019;154:755-766
  2. Joosten A, Desebbe O, Suehiro K, Murphy LS, Essiet M, Alexander B, et al. Accuracy and precision of non-invasive cardiac output monitoring devices in perioperative medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2017;118:298-310
  3. Bignami E, Belletti A, Moliterni P, Frati E, Guarnieri M, Tritapepe L. Clinical practice in perioperative monitoring adult cardiac surgery. Is there a standart of care? Results from a national survey. J Clin Monit Comput 2016;30:347-365
  4. Broch O, Carbonell J, Ferrando C, Metzner M, Carstens A, Albrechtet M, et al. Accuracy of an auto calibrated pulse contour analysis in cardiac surgery patients: a bi-center clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2015;15:171
  5. Aya HD, Cecconi M, Hamilton M, Rhodes A. Goal-directed therapy in cardiac surgery: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Br J Anaesth 2013;110:510-517
  6. Romognoli S, Rizza A, Ricci Z. Fluid Status Assessment and management during the perioperative phase in adult cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2016;30:1076-1084
  7. Lobo SM, Mendes CM, Rezende E, Dias FS. Optimizing perioperative hemodynamics what is new? Curr Opin Crit Care 2013;19:346-352
  8. Branstrup B, Tønnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R, Hjortsø E, Ørding H, Lindorff-Larsen K, et al. Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications. Comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens. Ann Surg 2003;238:641-648
  9. Zhang Z, Lu B, Ni H. Prognostic value of extravascular lung water index in critically ill patients: a systematic review of the literature. J CritCare 2012;27:420.e1-8
  10. Kastrup M, Markewitz A, Spies C, Carl M, Erb J, Grosse J, et al. Current practice of hemodynamic monitoring and vasopressor and inotropic therapy in post-operative cardiac surgery patients in Germany: results from a postal survey. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007;51:347-358
  11. Thomson R, Meeran H, Valencia O, Al-Subaie N. Goal-directed therapy after cardiac surgery and the incidence of acute kidney injury. J Crit Care 2014;29:997-1000
  12. Kapoor PM, Magoon R, Rawat R, Mehta Y, et al. Perioperative utility of goal directed therapy in high risk cardiac patients undergoing coronary artery by-pass grafting: “A clinical outcome and biomarker-based study. Ann of Card Anaesth 2016;19:638-