Journals / Bağcılar Tıp Bülteni / 2022 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Determining the Factors Affecting the Development of Perioperative Complications According to Aging Stages

Yaşlılık Evrelerine Göre Perioperatif Komplikasyon Gelişimine Etki Eden Faktörlerin Belirlenmesi

Pages
158–164
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In reference to controls, each elderly age group emerged as a significant independent predictor: youngestolds (OR: 4.9; 95% CI: 2.2-10.8; p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to examine perioperative complication risks in elderly patients stratified by age.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: Elderly patients (youngest-old, ages 65 to 74 years; middle-old, 75 to 84 years; and oldest-old, ≥85 years) and controls (20-30 years) who underwent surgical intervention under general anesthesia were included in this prospective observational study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In reference to controls, each elderly age group emerged as a significant independent predictor: youngestolds (OR: 4.9; 95% CI: 2.2-10.8; p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to examine perioperative complication risks in elderly patients stratified by age. Method: Elderly patients (youngest-old, ages 65 to 74 years; middle-old, 75 to 84 years; and oldest-old, ≥85 years) and controls (20-30 years) who underwent surgical intervention under general anesthesia were included in this prospective observational study. Results: Two-hundred-sixty patients were included. Different age subgroups showed a different course in terms of perioperative complications. For any combined end-point of any perioperative complication, having a body mass index>28 [odds ratio (OR): 2.4; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2-4.6; p=0.012] and being on multi-pharmacy regimen at baseline (OR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.1-3.5; p=0.029) emerged as significant independent predictors. In reference to controls, each elderly age group emerged as a significant independent predictor: youngestolds (OR: 4.9; 95% CI: 2.2-10.8; p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışma yaşa göre katmanlara ayrılmış yaşlı hastalarda perioperatif komplikasyon risklerini incelemeyi amaçlamıştır. Yöntem: Bu prospektif gözlemsel çalışmaya, genel anestezi altında cerrahi girişim yapılan yaşlı hastalar (yaşlı hastalar, 65-74 yaş; ileri yaşlı hastalar, 75-84 yaş; ve çok ileri yaşlı hastalar, ≥85 yaş) ve kontrol grubu (20-30 yaş) dahil edilmiştir. Bulgular: İki yüz altmış hasta çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Farklı yaş alt grupları perioperatif komplikasyonlar açısından farklı seyir göstermiştir. Herhangi bir komplikasyon olması şeklindeki kombine sonlanım noktası için, vücut kitle indeksi>28 olması [olasılık oranı (OO): 2,4; %95 güven aralığı (GA): 1,2-4,6; p=0,012] ve başlangıçta çoklu ilaç kullanıyor olmak (OO: 1,9; %95 GA: 1,1-3,5; p=0,029) anlamlı bağımsız belirleyiciler olarak bulunmuştur. Kontrollere göre, her bir yaşlı alt grubunda bulunmak anlamlı bağımsız belirleyici olarak saptanmıştır: Yaşlılar (OO: 4,9; %95 GA: 2,2-10,8; p

🔖

Cite This Article

ERGÜN, M. O., ZENGİN, S. Ü., DİNÇER, P. Ç., UMUROĞLU, T., AYKAÇ, Z. (2022). Determining the Factors Affecting the Development of Perioperative Complications According to Aging Stages. Bağcılar Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 158–164. https://ajindex.com/articles/458877

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Dall TM, Gallo PD, Chakrabarti R, West T, Semilla AP, Storm MV. An aging population and growing disease burden will require a large and specialized health care workforce by 2025. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32(11):2013-2020
  2. World Health Organization. Aging and Health. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-andhealth [accessed on March 3 2022] 3. Mohanty S, Rosenthal RA, Russell MM, Neuman MD, Yo CY, Esnaola NF. Optimal Perioperative Management of the Geriatric Patient: A Best Practices Guideline from the American College of Surgeons NSQIP and the American Geriatrics Society. J Am Coll Surg 2016;222(5):930-947
  3. Etzioni DA, Liu JH, O'Connell JB, Maggard MA, Ko CY. Elderly patients in surgical workloads: a population-based analysis. Am Surg 2003;69(11):961-965
  4. Chow WB, Rosenthal RA, Merkow RP, Ko CY, Esnaola NF; American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program; American Geriatrics Society. Optimal preoperative assessment of the geriatric surgical patient: a best practices guideline from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the American Geriatrics Society. J Am Coll Surg 2012;215(4):453-466
  5. DeFrances CJ, Lucas CA, Buie VC, Golosinskiy A. 2006 National Hospital Discharge Survey. Natl Health Stat Report 2008(5):1-20
  6. Hall MJ, DeFrances CJ, Williams SN, Golosinskiy A, Schwartzman A. National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2007 summary. Natl Health Stat Report 2010(29):1-20, 24
  7. Cullen KA, Hall MJ, Golosinskiy A. Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 2006. Natl Health Stat Report 2009(11):1-25
  8. Lin HS, Watts JN, Peel NM, Hubbard RE. Frailty and post-operative outcomes in older surgical patients: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr 2016;16(1):157
  9. Protopapa KL, Simpson JC, Smith NC, Moonesinghe SR. Development and validation of the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT). Br J Surg 2014;101(13):1774-1183
  10. Barnett S, Moonesinghe SR. Clinical risk scores to guide perioperative management. Postgrad Med J 2011;87(1030):535- 541
  11. Song X, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. Prevalence and 10-year outcomes of frailty in older adults in relation to deficit accumulation. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010;58(4):681-687
  12. Rockwood K, Howlett SE, MacKnight C, Beattie BL, Bergman H, Hébert R, et al. Prevalence, attributes, and outcomes of fitness and frailty in community-dwelling older adults: report from the Canadian study of health and aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci