Journals / Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 14

Effect of Vaporized Ethyl Pyruvate on the Shelf Life of Chicken Meat

Etil Pirüvat Buharının Tavuk Etinin Raf Ömrü Üzerine Etkisi

Pages
255–260
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it has been determined that evaporated EP application have an increased on the shelf life of chicken thigh meats and the most suitable concentration is 105 mg/L air vapourized EP.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the effect of evaporated EP on the shelf life of chicken thigh meat was investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, chicken meat samples placed in 1 L containers with 42, 105 and 420 mg/L in air vapour EP treatment and were stored at +4°C for 10 days after being sealed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it has been determined that evaporated EP application have an increased on the shelf life of chicken thigh meats and the most suitable concentration is 105 mg/L air vapourized EP.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the effect of evaporated EP on the shelf life of chicken thigh meat was investigated. For this purpose, chicken meat samples placed in 1 L containers with 42, 105 and 420 mg/L in air vapour EP treatment and were stored at +4°C for 10 days after being sealed. To determine some quality characteristics of the samples, microbiological (Total Aerobic Mesophilic Bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae and Yeast-Mold count) and physicochemical (pH, aw, and TBA) analysis were carried out on the 3rd, 6th, 8th and 10th days of storage. Also sensorial analysis of samples were performed on the 3rd and 10th days. According to the obtained results; compared with untreatment EP samples of chicken thigh meat, 42 mg/L of air vaporized EP application provided an increase for 4 days, 105 and 420 mg/L of air vaporized EP applications provided an increase for over 4 days on the shelf life of chicken thigh meats. It was observed that the increase in the EP ratio caused an increase in the amount of TBA, while the EP application had no effect on the pH and aw of the samples. However, there is an intense EP smell was felt in the 420 mg/liter air vapourized EP samples throughout the storage period. As a result, it has been determined that evaporated EP application have an increased on the shelf life of chicken thigh meats and the most suitable concentration is 105 mg/L air vapourized EP.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, buharlaştırılmış Etil Pirüvatın (EP) tavuk but etlerinin raf ömrü üzerine etkisi araştırılmıştır. Bu amaçla tavuk eti örnekleri1 L’lik kaplara konmuş ve her bir kaba sırasıyla 42, 105 ve 420 mg /L hava olacak şekilde EP ilave edilmiştir. Daha sonra kaplarkapatılıp +4oC’de 10 gün boyunca depolanmıştır. Bazı kalite özellikleri belirlenmek amacıyla örneklerde mikrobiyolojik (ToplamAerobik Mezofilik Bakteri, Enterobacteriaceae ve Maya-Küf sayıları) ve fizikokimyasal (pH, su aktivitesi (aw) ve Tiyobarbiturik Asit(TBA)) analizler depolamanın 3., 6., 8. ve 10. günlerinde yürütülmüştür. Örnekler ayrıca depolamanın 3. ve 10. günlerinde çeşitliduyusal kriterler açısından incelenmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre EP uygulanmamış örneklere kıyasla 42 mg/L EP uygulanmış tavukbut eti örneklerinin raf ömründe 4 gün; 105 ve 420 mg/L EP uygulanmış örneklerin raf ömründe ise 4 günden daha fazla artış olduğugözlenmiştir. Diğer taraftan artan EP oranı örneklerde aw ve pH değerleri açısından değişime neden olmazken, TBA değerinde artışaneden olmuştur. Bununla birlikte 420 mg/L EP uygulanmış tavuk örneklerinde depolama periyodu boyunca yoğun EP kokusuhissedilmiştir. Sonuç olarak buharlaştırılmış EP uygulamasının tavuk but etlerinin raf ömrü üzerinde artış meydana getirdiği ve buanlamda en uygun EP konsantrasyonunun 105 mg/L EP olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇETİN, B., URAN, H. (2022). Effect of Vaporized Ethyl Pyruvate on the Shelf Life of Chicken Meat. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 14, 255–260. https://ajindex.com/articles/458273

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. AOAC, 1984. Official methods of analysis. Centennial Edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington D.C., USA. Beuchat, L.R., 1998. Surface decontamination of fruits and vegetables eaten raw: a review. WHO, p: 1-42. http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/64435
  2. Bozkurt, F., Tornuk, F., Toker, O.S., Karasu, S., Arici, M., Durak, M.Z., 2015. Effect of vaporized ethyl pyruvate as a novel preservation agent for control of postharvest quality and fungal damage of strawberry and cherry fruits. Food Science and Technology, 65: 1044-1049.
  3. Buncic, S., Sofos, J., 2011. Interventions to control Salmonella contamination during poultry, cattle and pig slaughter. Food Research International, 45: 641-655.
  4. Burt, S.A., Fledderman, M.J., Haagsman, H.P., van Knapen, F., Veldhuizen, E.J.A., 2007. Inhibition of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis on agar and raw chicken by carvacrol vapour. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 119: 346–350.
  5. Cantalejo, M.J., Zouaghi, F., Perez-Arnedo, I., 2016. Combined effects of ozone and freeze-drying on the shelf-life of broiler chicken meat. Food Science and Technology, 68: 400-407.
  6. Debebe, T., Krüger, M., Huse, K., Kacza, J., Mühlberg, K., König, B., Birkenmeier, G., 2016. Ethyl Pyruvate: An AntiMicrobial Agent that Selectively Targets Pathobionts and Biofilms. Plos One, 11(9): 1-19. Del Río, E., Panizo-Morán, M., Prieto, M., Alonso-Calleja, C., Capita, R., 2007. Effect of various chemical decontamination treatments on natural microflora and sensory characteristics of poultry. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 115(3): 268-80.
  7. Durak, Z., Churey, J.J., Gates, M., Sacks, G.L., Worobo, W.R., 2012. Decontamination of green onions and baby spinach by vaporized ethyl pyruvate. Journal of Food Protection, 75(6): 1012-1022.
  8. Efe, M., Gümüşsoy, K.S., 2005. Ankara garnizonunda tüketime sunulan tavuk etlerinin mikrobiyolojik analizi. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 14(3): 151-157. FDA, 2018. U.S. Food & Drug Administration, Code of Federal Regulations. Title 21, Volume 3, 21CFR172.515. Frei C.B.F., Prudencio, E.S., Amboni, R.D.M.C., Pinto, S.S., Murakami, A.N.N., Murakami, F.S., 2012. Microencapsulation of bifidobacteria by spray drying in the presence of prebiotics. Food Research International, 45:306- 312. Gökoğlu, N., Yerlikaya, P., Uran, H., Topuz, O.K. 2010. The effect of modified atmosphere packaging on the quality and shelf life of Frankfurter type-sausages. Journal of Food Quality, 33: 367-380.
  9. Gosselin, R.E., Ho