Journals / Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 15

Predictability of Fog Visibility with Artificial Neural Network for Esenboga Airport

Pages
542–551
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, consistencies for the years 2016 and 2017, when all data weretested regardless of fog existence were found below expectations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Fog event affects air, land and sea transportation adversely by reducing visibility, thus causes economic loss.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In thisstudy, fog visibility prediction was made with artificial neural networks and validations were made for Esenboğa Airport.Temperature, dew point temperature, pressure, wind speed and relative humidity, which are considered to be the most importantparameters for fog occurrence, were used for 2013-2015 years to train an artificial neural network.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, consistencies for the years 2016 and 2017, when all data weretested regardless of fog existence were found below expectations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013-2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Fog event affects air, land and sea transportation adversely by reducing visibility, thus causes economic loss. Besides, it has animportant role in construction planning. For this reason, it is very important to predict visibility before and during fog events. In thisstudy, fog visibility prediction was made with artificial neural networks and validations were made for Esenboğa Airport.Temperature, dew point temperature, pressure, wind speed and relative humidity, which are considered to be the most importantparameters for fog occurrence, were used for 2013-2015 years to train an artificial neural network. We selected only January,February, November and December months, as those are the foggiest months for Esenboğa airport. Correlation of test part wasevaluated after training. Then, whole data for 2016-2017 years (regardless of fog existence) were used for validation of the outputagain. As a result, we found a correlation value (R) of 0.80 for the test part of 2013-2015 years; R=0.41 and root mean square error(RMSE) of 2652m for all data of the 2016 year; and R = 0.53 and RMSE = 2464m for all data of the 2017 year. The error rate (R =0.80) for the test part (2013-2015) was found acceptable. However, consistencies for the years 2016 and 2017, when all data weretested regardless of fog existence were found below expectations.

🔖

Cite This Article

OĞUZ, K., PEKİN, M. A. (2022). Predictability of Fog Visibility with Artificial Neural Network for Esenboga Airport. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 15, 542–551. https://ajindex.com/articles/458051

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Zhou, B., Introduction to a New Fog Diagnostic Scheme. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service, National Centers for Environmental Prediction, 2011
  2. Baboo, Dr. S. S. and Shereff, I. K., An Efficient Weather Forecasting System using Artificial Neural Network, International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, Vol. 1, No. 4, October 2010
  3. Fabbian D., De-Dear R., Lellyett S., Application of artificial neural network forecasts to predict fog at Canberra international airport, Weather Forecast 22:372–381, 2007
  4. Colabone R.O., Ferrari A., da Silva-Vecchia F., Bruno-Tech A., Application of artificial neural networks for fog forecast, Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management 7(2):240-246, 2015
  5. He Y.D., He H.Y., Guo Y.Y., Shen J.T., Fog Visibility Based on Neural Network Algorithm Research, 14th COTA International Conference of Transportation Professionals, Changsha, China, July 4-7, 2014
  6. Turan, L., Dengiz, Ş., Yüksel, E. ve Ertaş, C., Ankara Esenboğa Havalimanı Vahşi Hayat ve Kuşla Mücadele Çalışması. Ankara: İnforama, 2009
  7. Oto, N., Çevresel Sürdürülebilirlik ve Havaalanları: Esenboğa Havalimanı Örneği, Doktora Tezi, Sosyal Çevre Bilimleri ABD, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara Üniversitesi, 2011
  8. Ertaş, S.K., Meteoroloji Ders Kitabı, Devlet Hava Meydanları İşletmesi Genel Müdürlüğü, 2004
  9. Krenker, A., Bester, J., Kos, A., Introduction to the artificial neural networks. In: Suzuki, K. (ed.) Artificial Neural Networks, Methodological Advances and Biomedical Applications, pp. 3–18. Croatia: InTech, 2011
  10. Keskin M.E. ve Taylan E.D., Orta Akdeniz Havzasındaki Akımların Stokastik Modellemesi, İMO Teknik Dergi, 4271 -4291, Yazı 282, 2007
  11. McCulloch, W. and Pitts, W., A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity, Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, Vol. 5, pp. 115-133, 1943. [12]Rumelhart, D. and McClelland J., Parallel Distributed Processing, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1986
  12. Yavuz, S. ve Deveci M., İstatiksel Normalizasyon Tekniklerinin Yapay Sinir Ağın Performansına Etkisi, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 40, ss. 167-187, 2012
  13. Uslu M., Yapay Sinir Ağları ile Sınıflandırma, İleri İstatistik Projeleri, Fen Fakültesi, İstatistik Bölümü, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, 2013
  14. Çavuşlu M.A., Becerikli Y. ve Karakuzu C., Levenberg-Marquardt Algoritması ile YSA Eğitiminin Donanımsal